In: Statistics and Probability
A researcher has used a complex design to study the effects of caffeine (caffeinated and decaffeinated) and problem difficulty (easy and hard) on subjects’ memories. The researcher tested a total of eighty subjects, with twenty subjects randomly assigned to each of the four groups resulting from the factorial combination of the two independent variables. The data presented in the table represent the percentage words that subjects recalled correctly in each of the four conditions.
|
||
Problem difficulty |
Caffeinated |
Decaffeinated |
Easy |
99 |
85 |
Hard |
95 |
70 |
1. Is there evidence of a possible interaction in this experiment?
2.What aspects of the results of this experiment would lead you to be hesitant to interpret an interaction, if one were present in this experiment?
3.How could the researcher modify the experiment so as to be able to interpret an interaction if it should occur?
1.
Given table data is as below
calculation formula for E table matrix
expected frequencies calculated by applying E - table matrix formula
calculate chi square test statistic using given observed frequencies, calculated expected frequencies from above
set up null vs alternative as null, Ho: no relation b/w X and Y OR X and Y are independent alternative, H1: exists a relation b/w X and Y OR X and Y are dependent level of significance, α = 0.05 from standard normal table, chi square value at right tailed, ᴪ^2 α/2 =3.8415 since our test is right tailed,reject Ho when ᴪ^2 o > 3.8415 we use test statistic ᴪ^2 o = Σ(Oi-Ei)^2/Ei from the table , ᴪ^2 o = 0.5012 critical value the value of |ᴪ^2 α| at los 0.05 with d.f (r-1)(c-1)= ( 2 -1 ) * ( 2 - 1 ) = 1 * 1 = 1 is 3.8415 we got | ᴪ^2| =0.5012 & | ᴪ^2 α | =3.8415 make decision hence value of | ᴪ^2 o | < | ᴪ^2 α | and here we do not reject Ho ᴪ^2 p_value =0.479 ANSWERS --------------- null, Ho: no relation b/w X and Y OR X and Y are independent alternative, H1: exists a relation b/w X and Y OR X and Y are dependent test statistic: 0.5012 critical value: 3.8415 p-value:0.479 decision: do not reject Ho |
we do not have enough evidence to support the claim that possible interaction in this experiment
2.
the results of this experiment would lead you to be hesitant to interpret an interaction, if one were present in this experiment then it is possible to support the claim.
3.
The researcher tested a total of eighty subjects, with twenty subjects randomly assigned to each of the four groups resulting from the factorial combination of the two independent variables.
the researcher modify the experiment so as to be able to interpret an interaction.