Question

In Chapter 1, our text addresses five psychological perspectives or schools of thought: psychodynamic or psychoanalytic, behaviorism, humanistic, neuroscience, and cognitive. These perspectives greatly influence how psychologists approach their work and interpret their research findings. Which perspective(s) do you agree with and why or which do think would be most effective? Be sure to include the issue of human behavior in your discussion and provide a real life application of your viewpoint.

Answer 1

Humanism

I agree with Humanistic philosophy most.

Humanistic psychology is a psychological point of view that underscores the investigation of the entire individual (know as comprehensive quality). Humanistic clinicians take a gander at human conduct, through the eyes of the spectator, as well as through the eyes of the individual doing the carrying on. Humanistic therapists trust that a person's conduct is associated with his inward sentiments and mental self view. The humanistic point of view focuses on the view that every individual is remarkable and individual, and has the choice to change whenever in his or her lives. The humanistic point of view proposes that we are each in charge of our own bliss and prosperity as people. We have the intrinsic (i.e., natural) limit with respect to self-completion, which is our extraordinary want to accomplish our most noteworthy potential as individuals. As a result of this emphasis on the individual and his or her own encounters and subjective view of the world the humanists viewed logical techniques as unseemly to study conduct. Two of the most compelling and persisting speculations in humanistic psychology research that rose in the 1960s are those of Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow.

Humanism, a worldview that developed in the 1960s, centers around the human opportunity, pride, and potential. A focal supposition of humanism, as per Huitt (2001), is that individuals demonstration with deliberateness and values[1]. This is rather than the behaviorist idea of operant molding (which contends that all conduct is the aftereffect of the use of outcomes) and the subjective clinician conviction that the finding information or developing significance is key to learning. Humanists likewise trust that it is important to think about the individual all in all, particularly as an individual develops and creates over the life expectancy. It takes after that the investigation of the self, inspiration, and objectives are territories quite compelling.

The humanistic point of view trusts that individuals look for esteem, which means, and innovativeness in everything they do. It comprehends that individuals have objectives, and that achieving these objectives is essential. It likewise comprehends that people can settle on decisions that influence them and others, thus those decisions convey with them an awareness of other's expectations.

Illustrations:

1. A man feels like his or her life is insipid and exhausting. A humanistic point of view would urge the individual to do some spirit seeking and figure out what is missing – a leisure activity? Kinships? A relationship? Whatever it takes for the individual to feel completely self-realized is the thing that ought to be looked for as treatment.
2. Another case of the humanistic viewpoint is for a man to center around their qualities as opposed to their issues. The individual is empowered not look past his or her blemishes as he or she progresses in the direction of a more fulfilled, more entire life.