In: Accounting
Background: Elon Musk, the man who is responsible for revolutionizing the automotive space is confused. Why you ask? | ||||
He met with Ms. Static who explained to him that under the current allocation system, engineering costs amount to $46,880 per Model S and $15,630 per Model X. Elon responds: | ||||
"How - Look at the Model X - its freaking awesome and is insanely over engineered. How can it cost leass than our base model?" he decides to hire you as a consultant to drive transperency into the costs … | ||||
Problem: Develop ABC to clear the mess up | ||||
Cost Pool | Activity Costs | Cost Driver | Driver | |
Machine Setup | $ 360,000 | Setup Hours | 4,000 | |
Materials Handling | $ 100,000 | Material (lbs) | 20,000 | |
Utility | $ 40,000 | Kw/hr | 40,000 | |
Information by Product | Model S | Model X | ||
Units | 4,000 | 20,000 | ||
Direct Materials | $ 42,000 | $ 54,000 | ||
Direct Labor | $ 24,000 | $ 40,000 | ||
Setup Hours | 200 | 240 | ||
Materials | 1,000 | 3,000 | ||
Kw/Hr | 2,000 | 4,000 | ||
iii | Knowing Tesla's business - are there additional things that you would look into in cost allocation? (Remember: Tesla has significant costs related to battery, R&D, software programming, Qaing, etc.) | |||
Activity Based Allocation per model | |||||||
Model S | Model X | ||||||
DM | $42,000 | $54,000 | Allocation Basis | ||||
DL | $24,000 | $40,000 | Model S | Model X | |||
Machine Set Up | $36,000 | $43,200 | Machine Set Up | $360,000 | |||
Material Handling | $5,000 | $15,000 | Total Set Up Hrs | 4000 | 200 | 240 | |
Utilities | $2,000 | $4,000 | Allocation | ||||
Total OH Cost Excluding DM and DL | $43,000 | $62,200 | $360000/2000*200 | $36,000 | |||
$360000/2000*240 | $43,200 | ||||||
Material Handling | $100,000 | ||||||
Total materials lbs | 20000 | 1000 | 3000 | ||||
Allocation | |||||||
$100000/20000*1000 | $5,000 | ||||||
$100000/20000*3000 | $15,000 | ||||||
Utility | $40,000 | ||||||
Total Kw/Hr | 40000 | 2000 | 4000 | ||||
Allocation | |||||||
$40000/40000*2000 | $2,000 | ||||||
$40000/40000*4000 | $4,000 | ||||||
The cornerstone of ABM is distinguishing between value-added costs and non-value-added costs. A value-added cost is the cost of an activity that cannot be eliminated without affecting a product’s value to the customer. Valueadded costs are necessary (as long as the activity that drives such costs is performed efficiently). In contrast, companies try to minimize non-valueadded costs—costs that can be eliminated without affecting a product’s value to the customer. Activities such as handling and storing inventories, transporting partly finished products from one part of the plant to another, and changing the set-up of production line operations to produce a different model of the product are all non-value-added activities that can be reduced, if not eliminated, by careful redesign of the plant layout and the production process | |||||||
Sinc e Telsa is a automobile manufacturing space which manufactures and allocates | |||||||
costs to the different models in order to find out the profitability of each | |||||||
model Telsa is producing. | |||||||
So from the age old traditional model of allocating cost into Model S and Model X which | |||||||
shows a higher cost in terms of engineering for the machine set up,material handling | |||||||
and utilities than if we use the ABM for Model S which shows lesser cost . | |||||||
So the non value added activties like battery ,R & D should be reduced to make the cost | |||||||
comparable in the market for Tesla | |||||||