Question

In: Math

The results of a​ two-way ANOVA using the accompanying data and hypothesis tests for interaction between...

The results of a​ two-way ANOVA using the accompanying data and hypothesis tests for interaction between Factor A and Factor B and for each factor are provided below. Using these data and​ results, determine which means are different using α= 0.01when warranted.

Factor A

FactorB

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 1

66

88

1010

77

1212

3232

1010

1919

3030

Level 2

2828

3030

3030

1111

2020

3838

1616

2020

3939

Level 3

3535

4040

4242

3131

2929

4141

2121

4040

3232

Are the means for Factor​ A, Level 1 and Factor​ A, Level 2 significantly​ different?

A.Yes

B. No

C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor A means are equal.

D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.

Are the means for Factor​ A, Level 1 and Factor​ A, Level 3 significantly​ different?

A.Yes

B. No

C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor A means are equal.

D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.

Are the means for Factor​ A, Level 2 and Factor​ A, Level 3 significantly​ different?

A.Yes

B.No

C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor A means are equal.

D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.

Are the means for Factor​ B, Level 1 and Factor​ B, Level 2 significantly​ different?

A.Yes

B.No

C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor B means are equal.

D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.

Are the means for Factor​ B, Level 1 and Factor​ B, Level 3 significantly​ different?

A.No

B.Yes

C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor B means are equal.

D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.

Are the means for Factor​ B, Level 2 and Factor​ B, Level 3 significantly​ different?

A.No

B.Yes

C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor B means are equal.

D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.

Solutions

Expert Solution

The results of a​ two-way ANOVA using the accompanying data and hypothesis tests for interaction between Factor A and Factor B and for each factor are provided below. Using these data and​ results, determine which means are different using α= 0.01when warranted.

MINITAB used.

General Linear Model: Data versus A, B

Method

Factor coding

(-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor

Type

Levels

Values

A

Fixed

3

A1, A2, A3

B

Fixed

3

B1, B2, B3

Analysis of Variance

Source

DF

Adj SS

Adj MS

F-Value

P-Value

A

2

11325157

5662578

9.66

0.001

B

2

21976136

10988068

18.75

0.000

A*B

4

1484102

371026

0.63

0.645

Error

18

10548520

586029

Total

26

45333915

Model Summary

S

R-sq

R-sq(adj)

R-sq(pred)

765.525

76.73%

66.39%

47.65%

Comparisons for Data

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: A

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 99% Confidence

A

N

Mean

Grouping

A3

9

3299.33

A

A2

9

2366.44

A

B

A1

9

1721.67

B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous Tests for Differences of Means

Difference
of A Levels

Difference
of Means

SE of
Difference

Simultaneous
99% CI

T-Value

Adjusted
P-Value

A2 - A1

645

361

(-555, 1844)

1.79

0.202

A3 - A1

1578

361

(378, 2777)

4.37

0.001

A3 - A2

933

361

(-266, 2132)

2.59

0.047

Individual confidence level = 99.62%

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: B

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 99% Confidence

B

N

Mean

Grouping

B3

9

3490.11

A

B2

9

2603.56

A

B1

9

1293.78

B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous Tests for Differences of Means

Difference
of B Levels

Difference
of Means

SE of
Difference

Simultaneous
99% CI

T-Value

Adjusted
P-Value

B2 - B1

1310

361

(110, 2509)

3.63

0.005

B3 - B1

2196

361

(997, 3396)

6.09

0.000

B3 - B2

887

361

(-313, 2086)

2.46

0.060

Individual confidence level = 99.62%

Are the means for Factor​ A, Level 1 and Factor​ A, Level 2 significantly​ different?

A.Yes

Answer: B. No   ( p value 0.202 which is > 0.01 level)

C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor A means are equal.

D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.

Are the means for Factor​ A, Level 1 and Factor​ A, Level 3 significantly​ different?

Answer: A.Yes ( p value 0.001 which is < 0.01 level)

B. No

C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor A means are equal.

D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.

Are the means for Factor​ A, Level 2 and Factor​ A, Level 3 significantly​ different?

A.Yes

Answer: B.No( p value 0.047 which is > 0.01 level)

C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor A means are equal.

D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.

Are the means for Factor​ B, Level 1 and Factor​ B, Level 2 significantly​ different?

Answer A.Yes ( p value 0.005 which is < 0.01 level)

B.No

C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor B means are equal.

D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.

Are the means for Factor​ B, Level 1 and Factor​ B, Level 3 significantly​ different?

A.No

Answer B.Yes( p value 0.000 which is < 0.01 level)

C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor B means are equal.

D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.

Are the means for Factor​ B, Level 2 and Factor​ B, Level 3 significantly​ different?

Answer:A.No( p value 0.060 which is > 0.01 level)

B.Yes

C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor B means are equal.

D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.


Related Solutions

Using the data below, perform a two-way ANOVA. Test the hypothesis of interaction at the 1%...
Using the data below, perform a two-way ANOVA. Test the hypothesis of interaction at the 1% level of significance. Also, use a 1% level of significance to test the null hypotheses of equal column and equal row means. Factor Level 1 Level 2 Level A 14 16 18 12 16 16 Level B 10 12 16 12 12 14
Purpose: To learn how to analyze data from a two-way Anova and apply the results to...
Purpose: To learn how to analyze data from a two-way Anova and apply the results to a research scenario. Instructions: Enter the data below into the SPSS Data Editor (download the .sav file from D2L to check your work). Run a two-way analysis of variance and create a line graph depicting the group means. Use your results to answer the questions below, and then submit in D2L. Research Scenario: You have been raising Bombina orientalis, or Oriental fire-bellied toads, and...
When would it be appropriate to use the following statistical tests?/ One-way ANOVA and a Two-way...
When would it be appropriate to use the following statistical tests?/ One-way ANOVA and a Two-way ANOVA
Perform a Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and report the results using correct APA style; report...
Perform a Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and report the results using correct APA style; report whether significance was found for Factor A, Factor B, and/or an interaction between Factors A and B was found. If the test statistic is significant, run a post hoc test to determine between what groups significance was found. Report an effect size for all significant results. This is all the information they gave me.
what is the difference between Cohen’s d and eta^2? In one way ANOVA, two way ANOVA,...
what is the difference between Cohen’s d and eta^2? In one way ANOVA, two way ANOVA, and repeated measures ANOVA is cohen’s d only used for one way ANOVA and repeated measures ANOVA?
The following observations were obtained when conducting a two-way ANOVA experiment with no interaction. Factor A...
The following observations were obtained when conducting a two-way ANOVA experiment with no interaction. Factor A Factor B 1 2 3 4   X¯¯¯jX¯j for Factor B 1 1 4 1 1 1.750 2 9 9 10 7 8.750 3 13 11 12 14 12.500 X−iX−i for Factor A 7.667 8.000 7.667 7.333 X¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ = 7.6667X¯¯⁢ = 7.6667 a. Calculate SST, SSA, SSB, and SSE. (Round intermediate calculations to at least 4 decimal places. Round your answers to 2 decimal places.)...
43 Inferential statistics, or hypothesis testing (i.e., t-tests, ANOVA, etc.), involves a comparison between which two...
43 Inferential statistics, or hypothesis testing (i.e., t-tests, ANOVA, etc.), involves a comparison between which two elements? A. Research results from a sample and hypotheses about a population. B. Research results from a population and hypotheses about a sample. C. Research results from a sample and hypotheses about a sample. D. Research results from a population and hypotheses about a population. 4 A researcher wants to examine the effectiveness of different types of classroom instruction on students’ test performance. He...
6 step hypothesis tests using ANOVA: Levene Test and ANOVA: single factor Info: Concerned about Friday...
6 step hypothesis tests using ANOVA: Levene Test and ANOVA: single factor Info: Concerned about Friday absences, management examined the number of persons absent for each of the past three Fridays. Does this sample provide sufficient evidence to conclude there is a significant difference in the average number of absences? Use alpha = .05. Plant 1 Plant 2 Plant 3 Plant 4 19 17 27 22 24 20 32 27 20 16 27 25
Conduct a TWO WAY ANOVA using the following data in Excel. State Schools and Private Schools...
Conduct a TWO WAY ANOVA using the following data in Excel. State Schools and Private Schools Campus 1 : 47, 52, 37, 50, 25, 33, 31, 50 Campus 2: 77, 61, 55, 48, 52, 68, 60, 60
Part 2 of 2 - Two-way ANOVA Two-way ANOVA: For the problem below, use the ANOVA...
Part 2 of 2 - Two-way ANOVA Two-way ANOVA: For the problem below, use the ANOVA table to determine whether the main effects and interaction were significant. Use the table of means and effect sizes to interpret the significant effects. Katy is interested in the impact of different types of studying methods on students’ memory for different topics. She assesses the impact of flashcards versus study guides on students’ memory of biology versus psychology. The mean performance memory scores, ANOVA...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT