Question

In order to gauge the success of the opposing pieces, think back to the rhetorical triangle: Does the author appeal to logos through the use of facts, statistics, logic, etc? Are anecdotes, narrative examples, personal stories, etc. used to create pathos? Does the author invoke ethos by appealing to the reader’s sense of right and wrong? Also, does the author establish his/her credibility through knowledge, tone, etc? Is there anything else about the author’s writing that is particularly effectual in helping him/her to reinforce his/her thesis?

Answer 1

The rhetorical triangle is made up of logos, pathos and ethos.This treatises was written by Aristotle in the 4 th century BC. Generally logos is very important which can be compared as meat for an argument. when you argue it should be proved with logic facts or truth. Pathos can be compared with cheese which deals with emotions , we can make any emotion like anger, fear,sadness to move towards war, to prevent illness, to donate a cause respectively . ethos is just like a nutritious food, with the speaker credibility, character and authority.

To make the rhetorical triangle more simple we can say logos as message, pathos as the audience and ethos as the speaker.

For example, ethos is writer in which way he can affects the argument. If you want to clarify who you are, you are competent enough to prove yourself and from where the authority comes.The audience may figure out your motives, beliefs and assumptions by the way you present your idea in problem solving . they evaluate your credibility and decide whether you are sincere or not.

Pathos are the audience, where you need to understand their emotions. when we're communicating we should be clear about what we are communicating and plan our communication style and fix that in the audience mind They should carry the emotions.

Logos is the message, where the audience are able to analyze the message by putting it in the context.The author has rightly proved the rhetorical triangle.