In: Math
Background
The 2016 US Presidential Election brought considerable attention to the phenomenon of “fake news”: entirely fabricated and often partisan content that is presented as factual. Researchers evaluated one mechanism that may contribute to the believability of fake news: fluency via prior exposure. Using an actual fake news headline presented as it was seen on Facebook (Kid Rock launches campaign to run for U.S. Senate in 2018), the researchers hypothesized that previous exposure to the fake news story would increase perceptions of accuracy. Subjects were pre-screened to determine in which of 3 groups they belonged: 1) no previous exposure to the fake news story, 2) previous exposure to the fake news story and had not heard that the story was, in fact, fake, or 3) previous exposure to the fake news story but had heard that the story was, in fact, fake. They recorded perception of the accuracy of the news story (ranging from 1 (definitely false) to 6 (definitely true)).
Please complete all empty boxes in the tables below.
Data
No exposure (Group A) |
Previous exposure, not informed it was fake (Group B) |
Previous exposure, informed it was fake (Group C) |
|
1 |
3 |
6 |
|
1 |
6 |
6 |
|
2 |
6 |
6 |
|
4 |
4 |
5 |
|
1 |
5 |
5 |
|
4 |
4 |
4 |
|
3 |
5 |
3 |
|
2 |
6 |
4 |
|
1 |
6 |
6 |
|
6 |
3 |
3 |
|
5 |
3 |
6 |
|
Mean |
|||
St. Dev |
1.79 |
1.29 |
1.22 |
n |
|||
N |
One-way ANOVA (please show your work!)
Source of variability |
df |
SS |
MS |
F |
h2 |
|
Between-groups |
31.09 |
|||||
Within-groups (error) |
63.64 |
|||||
Total |
94.73 |
|||||
Critical F-value (obtain from F table) |
||||||
Is the ANOVA significant? Y or N |
||||||
Post-hoc results using the Tukey test
Comparison |
p-value |
Significant? Y or N |
Group A versus Group B |
.0095 |
|
Group A versus Group C |
.0033 |
|
Group B versus Group C |
.6156 |
Full interpretation of the results
|
Anova: Single Factor | ||||||
SUMMARY | ||||||
Groups | Count | Sum | Average | Variance | ||
A | 11 | 30 | 2.727273 | 3.218182 | ||
B | 11 | 51 | 4.636364 | 1.654545 | ||
C | 11 | 54 | 4.909091 | 1.490909 | ||
ANOVA | ||||||
Source of Variation | SS | df | MS | F | P-value | F crit |
Between Groups | 31.09091 | 2 | 15.54545 | 7.328571 | 0.002561 | 3.31583 |
Within Groups | 63.63636 | 30 | 2.121212 | |||
Total | 94.72727 | 32 |
η² = Treatment Sum of
Squares
Total
Sum of Square
= 31.09091/94.63636 = 0.3285
Critical F-value (obtain from F table) |
3.3158 | |||||
Is the ANOVA significant? Y or N |
||||||
Yes, Anova is significant as TS > critical value
Comparison |
p-value |
Significant? Y or N |
Group A versus Group B |
.0095 |
Y |
Group A versus Group C |
.0033 |
Y |
Group B versus Group C |
.6156 |
N |