Question

In: Statistics and Probability

After the 2016 presidential election, Gallup collected a random sample of 1,021 Americans and estimated that...

After the 2016 presidential election, Gallup collected a random sample of 1,021 Americans and estimated that 47% of Americans wanted to keep the electoral college. One month before the election, in October 2016, another random poll of 1,100 Americans estimated that 52% wanted to keep the Electoral College. Statistically speaking, we can look at whether or not we can be sure that there was a change in opinions about keeping the Electoral College between October of 2016 and November of 2016.

(a) What is the point estimate for the November poll?

(b) What is the point estimate for the October poll?

(c) Are these point estimates statistics or parameters? Explain why or why not.

(d) Report and interpret the difference between the two point estimates.

(e) Compute the estimated standard error for the difference between two estimates. Show your work.

(f) Construct and interpret the difference between these groups at the 95% level. Show your work. 1 Now we can also perform a significance test.

(g) State the null hypothesis.

(h) State an alternative hypothesis.

(i) The test statistic z=-2.3012 and its associated p-value is approximately 0.021 for a two-tailed test at the 5% significance level. Interpret this result in regards to the hypotheses you stated above.

Solutions

Expert Solution


Related Solutions

The Gallup-Healthways Well-being Index is a comprehensive survey of the health status of Americans.  A random sample...
The Gallup-Healthways Well-being Index is a comprehensive survey of the health status of Americans.  A random sample of 2,580 adults were asked, "Have you ever been told by a physician or a nurse that you have depression?" Of these, 238 answered "Yes." Using JMP construct the 99% confidence interval for the true proportion of Americans who have been told they have depression, and fill in the appropriate bounds in the confidence interval interpretation given below. Round your answers to two decimal...
In the primaries leading up to the 2016 presidential​ election, a news website reported that the...
In the primaries leading up to the 2016 presidential​ election, a news website reported that the two politicians were in a​ "statistical tie" in the polls leading up to a state primary. Politician A led politician B​ 43% to​ 35% in the​ polls, with a margin of error of​ 5.2%. Explain what this this means to someone who may be unfamiliar with margin of error and confidence intervals. The confidence interval for politician A is ___% , ___ % and...
What happened, as it relates to data-driven marketing and decision making, in the 2016 presidential election?...
What happened, as it relates to data-driven marketing and decision making, in the 2016 presidential election? Why?
Using the American presidential election data from 1948-2016 (N = 18) on the percentage of the...
Using the American presidential election data from 1948-2016 (N = 18) on the percentage of the major 2- party vote received by the presidential candidate of the incumbent party, Incvte2, and the percentage change in real GDP during the 12 months prior to the election, "Pcrgdp", you find that the correlation coefficient for Incvte2 and Pcrgdp is 0.535. a) What percentage of the variation in "Incvte2" is attributable to variation in "Pcrgdp"? [6 points] b) Test the null hypothesis of...
In the 2016 presidential election, many polls were made available to readers on a daily basis....
In the 2016 presidential election, many polls were made available to readers on a daily basis. Of course, each of these polls reported a margin of error that was associated with the results. What is a margin of error, what does it tell us, and why is the margin of error reported? Is the margin of error truly necessary to calculate? Why or why not?
Find an article about the 2016 presidential election. Evaluate the article for priming, framing, and slant....
Find an article about the 2016 presidential election. Evaluate the article for priming, framing, and slant. Identify the following: The title and author of the article Is the article produced by a public or private outlet? Who is the intended audience’s and what is that group’s ideological leaning? Next, reflect upon your overall evaluation of the article’s legitimacy. Do you agree with the arguments and or facts presented or do you disagree. Why or why not?
In a sample of 500 people, 325 indicated they would vote in the next presidential election....
In a sample of 500 people, 325 indicated they would vote in the next presidential election. construct a 95% confidence interval estimate for the proportion of people who will vote in the next presidential election.
Minnesota had the highest turnout rate of any state for the 2016 presidential election.† Political analysts...
Minnesota had the highest turnout rate of any state for the 2016 presidential election.† Political analysts wonder if turnout in rural Minnesota was higher than turnout in the urban areas of the state. A sample shows that 615 of 820 registered voters from rural Minnesota voted in the 2016 presidential election, while 378 out of 525 registered voters from urban Minnesota voted. (a) Formulate the null and alternative hypotheses that can be used to test whether registered voters in rural...
Voter Turnout. Minnesota had the highest turnout rate of any state for the 2016 presidential election....
Voter Turnout. Minnesota had the highest turnout rate of any state for the 2016 presidential election. (United States Election Project website) Political analysts wonder if turnout in rural Minnesota was higher than turnout in the urban areas of the state. A sample shows that 663 of 884 registered voters from rural Minnesota voted in the 2016 presidential election, while 414 out of 575 registered voters from urban Minnesota voted. Formulate the null and alternative hypotheses that can be used to...
Background The 2016 US Presidential Election brought considerable attention to the phenomenon of “fake news”: entirely...
Background The 2016 US Presidential Election brought considerable attention to the phenomenon of “fake news”: entirely fabricated and often partisan content that is presented as factual. Researchers evaluated one mechanism that may contribute to the believability of fake news: fluency via prior exposure. Using an actual fake news headline presented as it was seen on Facebook (Kid Rock launches campaign to run for U.S. Senate in 2018), the researchers hypothesized that previous exposure to the fake news story would increase...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT