Question

In: Statistics and Probability

The average number of people in a family that received welfare for various years is given...

The average number of people in a family that received welfare for various years is given below.

Year Welfare family size
1969 4.0
1973 3.6
1975 3.2
1979 3.0
1983 3.0
1988 3.0
1991 2.9

Part (a) Using "Year" as the independent variable and "Welfare family size" as the dependent variable, make a scatter plot of the data.

Part (b) Calculate the least squares line. Put the equation in the form of: ? = a + bx. (Round your answers to three decimal places.)

? = +   x

Part (c) Find the correlation coefficient r. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)

r =  

Is it significant?

Yes

No     

Part (d) Find the estimated welfare family size in 1971. (Use your equation from part (b). Round your answer to one decimal place.)

( ) people

Find the estimated welfare family size in 1989. (Use your equation from part (b). Round your answer to one decimal place.)
( ) people

Part (e) Use the two points in part (d) to plot the least squares line.

Part (f) Based on the above data, is there a linear relationship between the year and the average number of people in a welfare family?

Yes

No     

Part (g) Using the rounded least squares line, estimate the welfare family sizes for 1960 and 1995. (Use your equation from part (b). Round your answer to one decimal place.)

1960 ( )    people
1995 ( ) people


Does the least squares line give an accurate estimate for those years? Explain why or why not.

Yes, we can estimate the welfare family size for any year using the least squares line.No, the years are outside the domain of 1969 to 1991.     

Part (h) Are there any outliers in the above data?

Yes, (1969, 4.0) is an outlier.

Yes, (1991, 2.9) is an outlier.     

Yes, (1969, 4.0) and (1991, 2.9) are outliers.

No, there are no outliers.

Part (i) What is the estimated average welfare family size for 1987? (Use your equation from part (b). Round your answer to one decimal place.)

( ) people

Does the least squares line give an accurate estimate for that year? Explain why or why not.

The estimate is not accurate because it does not follow the linear trend.

The estimate is not accurate because it is much lower than the observed values in 1983 and 1988.     

The estimate is accurate because it follows the linear trend of the data set and falls within the domain of the data.

The estimate is not accurate because it falls outside the domain.

Part (j) What is the slope of the least squares (best-fit) line? (Round your answer to three decimal places.)

( )

Interpret the slope.

As the Select ( year or size of the welfare family increases by one, the Select ( size of the welfare family oryear, decreases by ( ) .

Solutions

Expert Solution

Part a)

From the scatter, the plot shows that the Welfare family size and the year has a negative association.

b)

The regression equation is
Y = 88.720 - 0.043 X

c)

Pearson correlation of X and Y = -0.853
P-Value = 0.015

Comment: The estimated p-value is 0.015. Hence, we can conclude that the Welfare family size and Year has a significant correlation at 0.05 level of significance.

Is it significant?

Ans: Yes

d)

Part (d) Find the estimated welfare family size in 1971. (Use your equation from part (b). Round your answer to one decimal place.)

Ans: The estimated welfare family size in 1971 is

Y = 88.720 - 0.043 *1971 =3.967 =4.0 people.

Find the estimated welfare family size in 1989. (Use your equation from part (b). Round your answer to one decimal place.)

The estimated welfare family size in 1989 is

Y = 88.720 - 0.043 *1989= 3.2 people.

Part (e) The two points in part (d) to plot the least squares line are (1971, 4.0) and (1989, 3.2).

Part (f) Based on the above data, is there a linear relationship between the year and the average number of people in a welfare family?

Ans: Yes. Because of the significant correlation coefficient at 0.05 level of significance.


Related Solutions

The average number of people in a family that received welfare for various years is given...
The average number of people in a family that received welfare for various years is given below. Year Welfare family size 1969 4.0 1973 3.6 1975 3.2 1979 3.0 1983 3.0 1988 3.0 1991 2.9 Part (a) Calculate the least squares line. Put the equation in the form of: ? = a+ bx. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) ? = ________ + _______ x Part (b) Find the estimated welfare family size in 1972. (Use your equation from...
The average number of people in a family that received welfare for various years is given...
The average number of people in a family that received welfare for various years is given below. Year Welfare family size 1969 4.0 1973 3.6 1975 3.2 1979 3.0 1983 3.0 1988 3.0 1991 2.9 Part (b) Calculate the least squares line. Put the equation in the form of: ? = a + bx. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) ? = +   x Part (g) Using the rounded least squares line, estimate the welfare family sizes for 1960...
The average number of people in a family that received welfare for various years is given...
The average number of people in a family that received welfare for various years is given below. YEAR Welfare family size 1969 4.0 1973 3.6 1975 3.2 1979 3.0 1983 3.0 1988 3.0 1991 2.9 y=88.721+ -0.043x part d. Find the estimated welfare family size in 1970. (Use your equation from part (b). Round your answer to one decimal place.) _______ people. Find the estimated welfare family size in 1989. (Use your equation from part (b). Round your answer to...
The average number of people in a family that attended college for various years is given...
The average number of people in a family that attended college for various years is given in Table 12.29 year number of family members attending college 1969 4.0 1973 3.6 1975 3.2 1979 3.0 1983 3.0 1988 3.0 1991 2.9 Using “year” as the independent variable and “Number of Family Members Attending College” as the dependent variable, draw a scatter plot of the data. Calculate the least-squares line. Put the equation in the form of: ŷ = a + bx...
Estimate, by simulation, the average number of children there would be in a family if all people had children until they had a girl.
in R. Estimate, by simulation, the average number of children there would be in a family if all people had children until they had a girl. Do the same if all people had children until they had at least one boy and at least one girl. How many more children would you expect to find under the second scheme than under the first in 100,000 families? (Assume that girls and boys are equally likely.)
According to a recent study, the mean number of people in a family (a married couple)...
According to a recent study, the mean number of people in a family (a married couple) in Canada is 4.80. A sociologist thinks this may not be the correct value for the city that she lives in. She examines a large apartment complex and interviews 100 randomly selected families (married couples) in the complex and obtains a mean of 4.64 persons per family. It is also known that the population standard deviation, σ, can be assumed to be 0.796. You...
According to a recent study, the mean number of people in a family (a married couple)...
According to a recent study, the mean number of people in a family (a married couple) in Canada is 4.80. A sociologist thinks this may not be the correct value for the city that she lives in. She examines a large apartment complex and interviews 100 randomly selected families (married couples) in the complex and obtains a mean of 4.64 persons per family. It is also known that the population standard deviation, σ, can be assumed to be 0.796. You...
An article was written that on average only 35% of people read, and that the number...
An article was written that on average only 35% of people read, and that the number of books that are read are correlated to the reader’s age. A simple random survey was conducted on 34 people. The binomial question being “Do you read books?”. The 2 quantitative question being: “How many books have you read in the last 2 years?” and “What is your age”. The results are below: 18 people stated they do not read, 0 books per year....
it has been reported that the average number of children per family in the united staes...
it has been reported that the average number of children per family in the united staes is 2.3 per family. since the random variable "number of children"is discrete, justify reporting the value "2.3."
You are tasked with determining if there is a difference in the average number of years...
You are tasked with determining if there is a difference in the average number of years of education of men and women in California. You take a random sample of 1,800 men and 3,200 women. The average education in your sample of men is 13 years with a sample standard deviation of 3 years. The average education in your sample of women is 14 years with a sample standard deviation of 4 years. What is your null hypothesis? What is...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT