Question

In: Math

1.The US justice system considers an accused person innocent until proven guilty and there has to...

1.The US justice system considers an accused person innocent until proven guilty and there has to be proof beyond a reasonable doubt to convict the accused. In recent years, several individuals have been released from prison because new DNA tests proved them innocent. When the court originally convicted them (falsely as it turns out): (check all that apply)

a.

They committed a type-II error

b.

They committed both a type-I and a type-II error

c.

They committed a type-I error

d.

They committed neither a type-I nor a type-II error

2.In hypothesis testing, a Type 2 error occurs when (check all that apply)

a.

The null hypothesis is not rejected when the null hypothesis is true.

b.

The null hypothesis is rejected when the alternative hypothesis is true.

c.

The null hypothesis is not rejected when the alternative hypothesis is true.

d.

The null hypothesis is rejected when the null hypothesis is true.

3.Null and alternative hypotheses are statements about: (check all that apply)

a.

population parameters.

b.

sample parameters.

c.

sample statistics.

d.

it depends - sometimes population parameters and sometimes sample statistics.

Solutions

Expert Solution

1.Answer is (c) They committed type 1 error .

Note :Type 1 error is the error of rejecting a true null hypothesis

Type 2 error is the error of accepting a false null hypothesis

Null hypothesis is the hypothesis of no difference

In justice system the null hypothesis is : The accused is not guilty

Therefore , when the court originally convicted them ,that means they rejected the null hypothesis , they committed type 1 error .

2. answer is (c) The null hypothesis is not rejected when the alternative hypothesis is true .

Note : Alternative hypothesis is true means null hypothesis is false .Type 2 error is the error of accepting (or not rejecting a false null hypothesis) a false null hypothesis .

3. Answer is a) population parameters

Note :For example , in tests for mean , null hypothesis is

where is the population mean

Alternative hypothesis are

or   or  


Related Solutions

1.In the criminal justice system, a defendant is innocent until proven guilty.Therefore, the nully hypothesis is:...
1.In the criminal justice system, a defendant is innocent until proven guilty.Therefore, the nully hypothesis is: " This person is innocent.” a.In this case, what would be the Type I error? b.In this case what would be the Type II error? c.What do you think is the more costly error? 2.Suppose a researcher comes up with a new drug that in fact cures AIDS.She assigns some AIDS patients to receive a placebo, and others to receive the new drug.The null...
In the U.S. court​ system, a defendant is assumed innocent until proven guilty. Suppose that you...
In the U.S. court​ system, a defendant is assumed innocent until proven guilty. Suppose that you regard a court trial as a hypothesis test with null and alternative hypotheses Ho: Defendant is innocent Ha​: Defendant is guilty. a. Explain the meaning of a Type I error. b. Explain the meaning of a Type II error. c. If you were the​ defendant, would you want Alpha to be large or​ small? Explain your answer. d. If you were the prosecuting​ attorney,...
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty....
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty. In the United States, about 60% of the defendants are found guilty in criminal trials. (Source: The Book of Risks, by Larry Laudan, John Wiley and Sons) Suppose you are a news reporter following eight criminal trials. (For each answer, enter a number.) (a) If the trials were in Japan, what is the probability that all the defendants would be found guilty? (Round your...
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty....
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty. In the United States, about 60% of the defendants are found guilty in criminal trials. (Source: The Book of Risks, by Larry Laudan, John Wiley and Sons) Suppose you are a news reporter following four criminal trials. (For each answer, enter a number.) (a) If the trials were in Japan, what is the probability that all the defendants would be found guilty? (Round your...
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty....
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty. In the United States, about 60% of the defendants are found guilty in criminal trials. (Source: The Book of Risks, by Larry Laudan, John Wiley and Sons) Suppose you are a news reporter following five criminal trials. (For each answer, enter a number.) (a) If the trials were in Japan, what is the probability that all the defendants would be found guilty? What is...
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty....
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty. In the United States, about 60% of the defendants are found guilty in criminal trials. (Source: The Book of Risks, by Larry Laudan, John Wiley and Sons) Suppose you are a news reporter following twelve criminal trials. (For each answer, enter a number.) (a) If the trials were in Japan, what is the probability that all the defendants would be found guilty? (Round your...
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty....
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty. In the United States, about 60% of the defendants are found guilty in criminal trials†. Suppose you are a news reporter following six criminal trials. (a) If the trials were in Japan, what is the probability that all the defendants would be found guilty? (Round your answer to three decimal places.) What is this probability if the trials were in the United States? (Round...
In the United States, a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. There have been many cases...
In the United States, a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. There have been many cases that have proven the defendant innocent at the end of the trial. In cases against the government, it is easy to automatically assume that a defendant is guilty because of government resources (FBI, CIA, US Attorney’s, etc) being able to use their power to gather information. It has happened in several cases, where the government could be wrong and in doing so, pull “tricks”...
In the United States, a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. There have been many cases...
In the United States, a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. There have been many cases that have proven the defendant innocent at the end of the trial. In cases against the government, it is easy to automatically assume that a defendant is guilty because of government resources (FBI, CIA, US Attorney’s, etc) being able to use their power to gather information. It has happened in several cases, where the government could be wrong and in doing so, pull “tricks”...
Explain this "No one shall be held guilty until proven guilty in a court of Law".
Explain this "No one shall be held guilty until proven guilty in a court of Law".
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT