Question

In: Statistics and Probability

In the U.S. court​ system, a defendant is assumed innocent until proven guilty. Suppose that you...

In the U.S. court​ system, a defendant is assumed innocent until proven guilty. Suppose that you regard a court trial as a hypothesis test with null and alternative hypotheses

Ho: Defendant is innocent

Ha​: Defendant is guilty.

a. Explain the meaning of a Type I error.

b. Explain the meaning of a Type II error.

c. If you were the​ defendant, would you want Alpha to be large or​ small? Explain your answer.

d. If you were the prosecuting​ attorney, would you want β to be large or​ small? Explain your answer.

e. What are the consequences to the court system if you make Alpha equals=​0? Βeta equals=​0?


Solutions

Expert Solution

Given,

H0: Defendant is Innocent

Ha: Defendant is Guilty

Answer a:
When one rejects the null hypothesis when it it true, then this error is called Type I Error.It is generally represented as in Hypothesis Testing

In this case, Type I Error is interpreted as Defendant is deemed Guilty when the actual fact is he/she is Innocent.

Answer b:

When one accepts the null hypothesis when it it false, then this error is called Type II Error. It is generally represented as in Hypothesis Testing

In this case, Type II Error is interpreted as Defendant is deemed Innocent when the actual fact is he/she is Guilty.

Answer c:

If I was the defendant, I would want to be as small as possible.

Because if is large then the probability of committing a Type I Error increases, that is, Defendant is deemed Guilty when the actual fact is, he is Innocent. This would improve my chances of being treated as a guilty person and not as Innocent. So, I would want to be as small as possible

Answer d:
If I were the prosecuting attorney I would want to be as small as possible.

Because if is large, then probability of committing a Type II Error increases, that is, Defendant is deemed Innocent when the actual fact is he/she is Guilty. It would improve the chances of the Defendant not getting the required punishment for the crime he committed. So, I would want to be as small as possible.

Answer e:
If = 0, it means that Probability of committing a Type I Error is 0, that means, the null hypothesis is accepted when it is actually true. Further it means that Defendant is Innocent and is let off by the court system and hence, the right judgement is given by the court system.

If = 0, it means that Probability of committing a Type II Error is 0, that means, the null hypothesis is rejected when it is actually false. Further it means that Defendant is Guilty and is convicted in the court of law and hence the right judgement is given by the court system.


Related Solutions

In the United States, a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. There have been many cases...
In the United States, a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. There have been many cases that have proven the defendant innocent at the end of the trial. In cases against the government, it is easy to automatically assume that a defendant is guilty because of government resources (FBI, CIA, US Attorney’s, etc) being able to use their power to gather information. It has happened in several cases, where the government could be wrong and in doing so, pull “tricks”...
In the United States, a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. There have been many cases...
In the United States, a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. There have been many cases that have proven the defendant innocent at the end of the trial. In cases against the government, it is easy to automatically assume that a defendant is guilty because of government resources (FBI, CIA, US Attorney’s, etc) being able to use their power to gather information. It has happened in several cases, where the government could be wrong and in doing so, pull “tricks”...
1.In the criminal justice system, a defendant is innocent until proven guilty.Therefore, the nully hypothesis is:...
1.In the criminal justice system, a defendant is innocent until proven guilty.Therefore, the nully hypothesis is: " This person is innocent.” a.In this case, what would be the Type I error? b.In this case what would be the Type II error? c.What do you think is the more costly error? 2.Suppose a researcher comes up with a new drug that in fact cures AIDS.She assigns some AIDS patients to receive a placebo, and others to receive the new drug.The null...
1.The US justice system considers an accused person innocent until proven guilty and there has to...
1.The US justice system considers an accused person innocent until proven guilty and there has to be proof beyond a reasonable doubt to convict the accused. In recent years, several individuals have been released from prison because new DNA tests proved them innocent. When the court originally convicted them (falsely as it turns out): (check all that apply) a. They committed a type-II error b. They committed both a type-I and a type-II error c. They committed a type-I error...
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty....
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty. In the United States, about 60% of the defendants are found guilty in criminal trials. (Source: The Book of Risks, by Larry Laudan, John Wiley and Sons) Suppose you are a news reporter following eight criminal trials. (For each answer, enter a number.) (a) If the trials were in Japan, what is the probability that all the defendants would be found guilty? (Round your...
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty....
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty. In the United States, about 60% of the defendants are found guilty in criminal trials. (Source: The Book of Risks, by Larry Laudan, John Wiley and Sons) Suppose you are a news reporter following four criminal trials. (For each answer, enter a number.) (a) If the trials were in Japan, what is the probability that all the defendants would be found guilty? (Round your...
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty....
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty. In the United States, about 60% of the defendants are found guilty in criminal trials. (Source: The Book of Risks, by Larry Laudan, John Wiley and Sons) Suppose you are a news reporter following five criminal trials. (For each answer, enter a number.) (a) If the trials were in Japan, what is the probability that all the defendants would be found guilty? What is...
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty....
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty. In the United States, about 60% of the defendants are found guilty in criminal trials. (Source: The Book of Risks, by Larry Laudan, John Wiley and Sons) Suppose you are a news reporter following twelve criminal trials. (For each answer, enter a number.) (a) If the trials were in Japan, what is the probability that all the defendants would be found guilty? (Round your...
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty....
Innocent until proven guilty? In Japanese criminal trials, about 95% of the defendants are found guilty. In the United States, about 60% of the defendants are found guilty in criminal trials†. Suppose you are a news reporter following six criminal trials. (a) If the trials were in Japan, what is the probability that all the defendants would be found guilty? (Round your answer to three decimal places.) What is this probability if the trials were in the United States? (Round...
Explain this "No one shall be held guilty until proven guilty in a court of Law".
Explain this "No one shall be held guilty until proven guilty in a court of Law".
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT