Question

Explain the following theories: Modernization Theory—Development Theory—World Systems Theory. Which of these theories would you consider to be the clearest way to explain the differences today between developed and developing nations?

Answer 1

Modernization theory clarifies modernization inside social orders. This theory is a dynamic process model from traditional to modern society. The hypothesis takes a gander at the interior components of a nation while accepting that with help, "conventional" nations can be brought to improvement in a similar way increasingly created nations have been. Modernization hypothesis was a predominant worldview in the sociologies during the 1950s and 1960s, at that point went into a profound shroud. It made a rebound after 1991 yet stays a dubious model

Development theory is an assortment of speculations about how attractive change in the public eye is best accomplished. Such hypotheses draw on an assortment of sociology trains and approaches. In this article, numerous hypotheses are talked about, as are late advancements as to these speculations. Contingent upon which hypothesis that is being taken a gander at, there are various clarifications to the procedure of advancement and their disparities

The world systems theory is a way to deal with world history and social change that recommends there is a world financial framework where some nations get advantage and some get a disadvantage. Much the same as we can't comprehend a person's conduct without reference to their environmental factors, encounters, and culture, a country's financial framework can't be comprehended without reference to the world arrangement of which they are a section.

2. Modernization theory is clearest as both endeavors to distinguish the social factors that add to social advancement and improvement of social orders and looks to clarify the procedure of social development. Modernization hypothesis is dependent upon analysis starting among communist and free-showcase philosophies, world-frameworks scholars, globalization scholars, and reliance scholars among others. The modernization hypothesis stresses the procedure of progress as well as the reactions to that change. It likewise takes a gander at inner elements while alluding to social and social structures and the adjustment of new advances. The modernization hypothesis recommends that customary social orders will create as they receive progressively current practices. Advocates of modernization hypothesis guarantee that cutting edge states are wealthier and all the more impressive and that their residents are more liberated to appreciate a better quality of living. Advancements, for example, new information innovation and the need to refresh customary strategies in transport, correspondence and creation, it is contended, make modernization fundamental or if nothing else desirable over the business as usual. That view makes scrutinize troublesome since it infers that such improvements control the restrictions of human association, not the other way around. But, apparently, incomprehensibly, it additionally suggests that human organization controls the speed and seriousness of modernization.