In: Statistics and Probability
Lipitor is a cholesterol-reducing drug. In clinical trials, 94 subjects were treated with the drug and 200 were given a placebo. In the 94 subjects that received the treatment, 8 developed infections while in the placebo group of 200 there were 12 that developed an infection. At α=.05, is there a greater risk of infection from using Lipitor? Assume that P1 is the Percentage of Lipitor users that developed an infection.
1. What is the null hypothesis?
2. What is the alternate hypothesis?
3. At α=.05, what is the p-value rounded to 4 decimal places?
Given that,
sample one, x1 =8, n1 =94, p1= x1/n1=0.085
sample two, x2 =12, n2 =200, p2= x2/n2=0.06
null, Ho: p1 = p2
alternate, H1: p1 > p2
level of significance, α = 0.05
from standard normal table,right tailed z α/2 =1.645
since our test is right-tailed
reject Ho, if zo > 1.645
we use test statistic (z) = (p1-p2)/√(p^q^(1/n1+1/n2))
zo =(0.085-0.06)/sqrt((0.068*0.932(1/94+1/200))
zo =0.797
| zo | =0.797
critical value
the value of |z α| at los 0.05% is 1.645
we got |zo| =0.797 & | z α | =1.645
make decision
hence value of |zo | < | z α | and here we do not reject
Ho
p-value: right tail - Ha : ( p > 0.7973 ) = 0.21263
hence value of p0.05 < 0.21263,here we do not reject Ho
ANSWERS
---------------
1.
null, Ho: p1 = p2
2.
alternate, H1: p1 > p2
test statistic: 0.797
critical value: 1.645
decision: do not reject Ho
3.
p-value: 0.21263
we do not have enough evidence to support the claim that greater
risk of infection from using Lipitor.