In: Statistics and Probability
A consumer buying cooperative tested the effective heating area of 20 different electric space heaters with different wattages. Here are the results.
| Heater | Wattage | Area | ||
| 1 | 1,000 | 45 | ||
| 2 | 750 | 55 | ||
| 3 | 1,500 | 200 | ||
| 4 | 1,250 | 100 | ||
| 5 | 1,250 | 145 | ||
| 6 | 750 | 20 | ||
| 7 | 1,500 | 445 | ||
| 8 | 1,000 | 65 | ||
| 9 | 2,000 | 455 | ||
| 10 | 1,000 | 45 | ||
| 11 | 1,100 | 55 | ||
| 12 | 1,650 | 345 | ||
| 13 | 300 | 20 | ||
| 14 | 2,250 | 435 | ||
| 15 | 1,750 | 345 | ||
| 16 | 2,000 | 435 | ||
| 17 | 1,500 | 225 | ||
| 18 | 2,000 | 545 | ||
| 19 | 500 | 30 | ||
| 20 | 400 | 30 | ||
Click here for the Excel Data File
Compute the correlation between the wattage and heating area. Is there a direct or an indirect relationship? (Negative value should be indicated by a minus sign. Round your answer to 3 decimal places.)
Conduct a test of hypothesis to determine if it is reasonable that the coefficient is greater than zero. Use the 0.10 significance level. (Negative value should be indicated by a minus sign. Round intermediate calculations and final answer to 3 decimal places.)
H0: ρ ≤ 0; H1: ρ > 0 Reject H0 if t > 1.3304
Develop the regression equation for effective heating based on wattage. (Negative value should be indicated by a minus sign. Round your answers to 3 decimal places.)
Which heater looks like the “best buy” based on the size of the residual? (Negative value should be indicated by a minus sign. Round residual value to 2 decimal places.)
1. 0.903
2. Reject H0 if t > 2.101
3. y = -168.440 + 0.291*x
4. 15
| r² | 0.816 | |||||
| r | 0.903 | |||||
| Std. Error | 80.962 | |||||
| n | 20 | |||||
| k | 1 | |||||
| Dep. Var. | Area | |||||
| ANOVA table | ||||||
| Source | SS | df | MS | F | p-value | |
| Regression | 5,23,083.8895 | 1 | 5,23,083.8895 | 79.80 | 4.92E-08 | |
| Residual | 1,17,986.1105 | 18 | 6,554.7839 | |||
| Total | 6,41,070.0000 | 19 | ||||
| Regression output | confidence interval | |||||
| variables | coefficients | std. error | t (df=18) | p-value | 95% lower | 95% upper | 
| Intercept | -168.4395 | |||||
| Wattage | 0.2911 | 0.0326 | 8.933 | 4.92E-08 | 0.2226 | 0.3596 | 
| Observation | Area | Predicted | Residual | |||
| 1 | 45.0 | 122.7 | -77.7 | |||
| 2 | 55.0 | 49.9 | 5.1 | |||
| 3 | 200.0 | 268.2 | -68.2 | |||
| 4 | 100.0 | 195.4 | -95.4 | |||
| 5 | 145.0 | 195.4 | -50.4 | |||
| 6 | 20.0 | 49.9 | -29.9 | |||
| 7 | 445.0 | 268.2 | 176.8 | |||
| 8 | 65.0 | 122.7 | -57.7 | |||
| 9 | 455.0 | 413.8 | 41.2 | |||
| 10 | 45.0 | 122.7 | -77.7 | |||
| 11 | 55.0 | 151.8 | -96.8 | |||
| 12 | 345.0 | 311.9 | 33.1 | |||
| 13 | 20.0 | -81.1 | 101.1 | |||
| 14 | 435.0 | 486.6 | -51.6 | |||
| 15 | 345.0 | 341.0 | 4.0 | |||
| 16 | 435.0 | 413.8 | 21.2 | |||
| 17 | 225.0 | 268.2 | -43.2 | |||
| 18 | 545.0 | 413.8 | 131.2 | |||
| 19 | 30.0 | -22.9 | 52.9 | |||
| 20 | 30.0 | -52.0 | 82.0 |