In: Accounting
B) If you are risk neutral,
which candidate would be the better hire?
Here we ignore time value of money in the given question as we are not provided with any required data. Alternatively, we can assume any rate and calculate the value of each candidate.
Sokol will earn $800,000 a year with 100% certainty and will be paid $100,000 a year. So, his value per year is $700,000. Total expected value for 3 years is $2,100,000 ($700,000 x 3 years).
Rivera
Alternative 1 : If she becomes successful in first year, we will continue her for 3 years and she will generate the same $1,200,000 for remaining years
The total revenue for 3 years = 1,200,000 x 3 = 3,600,000
Total payments made to her = 100,000 x 3 = 300,000
Total Net Revenue = $3,300,000
Alternative 2 : If she becomes unsuccessful after first year, she will be removed from her place and there is no revenue for 2nd and 3rd year
Revenue for 1st year = $500,000
Payment for 1st year = $100,000
Net Revenue for 1st year = $400,000
Expected net revenue = 60% x 3,300,000 + 40% x 400,000
= $2,140,000
Based on this expected revenue, we would hire Ms.Rivera as expected value from hiring her is higher ($2,140,000) than the Mr.Sokol's expected value ($2,100,000).
Note :
We assumed that, if Ms.Rivera didn't succeed the first year, she will be removed and no other person will be appointed for 2nd and 3rd year (so no extra income for those years). If she is successful for first year then she will generate the same amount of $1,200,000 for remaining two years.