Question

give me opinion: in 1 pargraph

I've selected outcome number 8, which states, "Discuss the fundamentals of leadership in health care". The readings that helped me achieve this learning outcome mostly stem from the organizer on page 25, which outlines the differences between leadership competencies and management competencies. Before this class began, I didn't really know the difference between these two things. I thought that the only type of leadership was seen in management, but this chart clearly showed that there are ways to be a leader within an organization without being part of management or administration. For example, a leader can motivate stakeholders while a manager controls the resources and manages operations. I also liked learning about the importance of stakeholders and the different approaches to leadership, like the situational and style approaches. This topic rose to the top for me because leadership is something that I feel can be very difficult to understand, and this idea stuck out to me because there are so many ways to approach being a leader, depending on the type of people one is working with. It surprised me to learn how many factors go into being a great leader and that there's a lot of variation with it.

Answer 1

Management and Leadership are the Two straightforward words but two complex ideas. In the present hyper-aggressive business condition in which benefits are rare and organizations are compelled to accomplish more with less, monetary achievement (if not insignificant survival) relies upon employing the ideal individuals to oversee and the perfect individuals to lead.

A run of the mill rundown of administrative abilities may resemble this:

. Visioning

. Unequivocal Judgment

. Championing Change

. Driving for Results

. Arranging and Organizing

. Overseeing Others

. Impacting and Persuading

. Instructing and Developing Others

. Persuading Others

. Relationship Management

. Honesty

. Business Acumen

We've all known and saw characteristic conceived leaders. Be that as it may, most leaders are not conceived; associations need to create them. At the point when organizations drop insufficiently prepared supervisors (particularly on the off chance that they're new workers) into places of expert, it can be expensive to the main issue.

Poor administration is a tremendous shrouded taken a toll for U.S. businesses. Advancing chiefs who are not outfitted with essential administration and initiative abilities can have grave repercussions, including low confidence, high turnover and despondent clients. Powerful supervisors see how their part adds to executing key organization objectives. In the event that those objectives are not clear, they counsel senior chiefs to give that lucidity. At the point when supervisors are barely revolve around their group and don't look past their own area of expertise, they are not being leaders.