In: Accounting
I posted this already and got a terrible response.
Direct Method, Reciprocal Method, Overhead Rates
Macalister Corporation is developing departmental overhead rates based on direct labor hours for its two production departments—Molding and Assembly. The Molding Department employs 24 people, and the Assembly Department employs 84 people. Each person in these two departments works 2,070 hours per year. The production-related overhead costs for the Molding Department are budgeted at $203,000, and the Assembly Department costs are budgeted at $98,000. Two support departments—Engineering and General Factory—directly support the two production departments and have budgeted costs of $248,000 and $387,000, respectively. The production departments’ overhead rates cannot be determined until the support departments’ costs are properly allocated. The following schedule reflects the use of the Engineering Department’s and General Factory Department’s output by the various departments.
Engineering | General Factory | Molding | Assembly | |
Engineering hours | — | 2,100 | 2,500 | 7,500 |
Square feet | 109,980 | — | 409,370 | 91,650 |
For all requirements, round allocation ratios to four significant digits and round allocated costs to the nearest dollar.
Required:
1. Calculate the overhead rates per direct labor hour for the Molding Department and the Assembly Department using the direct allocation method to charge the production departments for support department costs. Round final answers to the nearest cent.
Overhead rate per DLH | |
Molding | $fill in the blank 1 |
Assembly | $fill in the blank 2 |
2. Calculate the overhead rates per direct labor hour for the Molding Department and the Assembly Department using the reciprocal method to charge support department costs to each other and to the production departments. Round final answers to the nearest cent. Round your intermediate calculations to four decimal places.
Overhead rate per DLH | |
Molding | $fill in the blank 3 |
Assembly | $fill in the blank 4 |
3. Explain the difference between the methods, and indicate the arguments generally presented to support the reciprocal method over the direct allocation method. (CMA adapted
Part 1 |
|||||
Engineering |
General Factory |
Molding |
Assembly |
||
Department Cost |
248000 |
387000 |
203000 |
98000 |
|
Allocation of: |
|||||
Engineering |
-248000 |
62000 |
186000 |
||
248000*2500/10000 |
248000*7500/10000 |
||||
Gen Factory |
-387000 |
316207 |
70793 |
||
387000*(409370 / (409370 + 91650)) |
387000*(91650 / (409370 + 91650)) |
||||
Total Overhead cost |
0 |
0 |
581207 |
354793 |
|
Direct Labor Hours |
2070*24 = 49680 |
2070 * 84 = 173880 |
|||
Overhead Rate per DLH |
11.70 |
2.04 |
|||
Part 2 |
|||||
Engineering |
General Factory |
Molding |
Assembly |
||
Engineering Hours |
0.17355 |
0.20661 |
0.61983 |
||
Square Feet |
0.18 |
0.67 |
0.15 |
||
Equation: |
|||||
E= |
248000+0.18GF |
||||
GF= |
387000+0.17355E |
||||
E= |
248000+0.18(387000+0.17355E) |
||||
E= |
248000+69660+0.03124E |
||||
1E-0.03124E = |
317660 |
||||
0.9688E= |
317660 |
||||
E= |
317660/0.9688 = $327890 |
||||
GF= |
387000+0.17355(327890) |
||||
GF= |
443905 |
||||
Engineering |
General Factory |
Molding |
Assembly |
||
Department Cost |
248000 |
387000 |
203000 |
98000 |
|
Allocation of: |
|||||
Engineering |
-327890 |
56907 |
67746 |
203238 |
|
Gen Factory |
79903 |
-443905 |
297416 |
66586 |
|
Total Overhead cost |
R/off |
0 |
0 |
568162 |
367823 |
Direct Labor Hours |
49680 |
173880 |
|||
Overhead Rate per DLH |
11.44 |
2.12 |
3. .
Reciprcal method ofallocation is accurate mehod of alocation, it keep the reciprocal rlation ship between support department. But it is generally not eas to calculat.
However, Direct method is simple to use.