Question

In: Accounting

Costs associated with two alternatives, code-named Q and R, being considered by Albiston Corporation are listed...

Costs associated with two alternatives, code-named Q and R, being considered by Albiston Corporation are listed below: Alternative Q Alternative R Supplies costs $ 72,000 $ 72,000 Power costs $ 33,300 $ 32,200 Inspection costs $ 26,000 $ 32,200 Assembly costs $ 38,000 $ 38,000 Required: a. Which costs are relevant and which are not relevant in the choice between these two alternatives? b. What is the differential cost between the two alternatives?

Solutions

Expert Solution

a.

Supplies costs Not relevant since the costs do not differ between alternatives
Power costs Relevant, since costs differ between alternatives
Inspection costs Relevant, since costs differ between alternatives
Assembly costs Not relevant since the costs do not differ between alternatives

b.

Alternative Q Alternative R Differential
Supplies costs $   72,000.00 $    72,000.00 $           -  
Power costs       33,300.00        32,200.00    (1,100.00)
Inspection costs       26,000.00        32,200.00     6,200.00
Assembly costs       38,000.00        38,000.00              -  
Total $ 169,300.00 $ 174,400.00 $ 5,100.00

Related Solutions

Saalfrank Corporation is considering two alternatives that are code-named M and N. Costs associated with the...
Saalfrank Corporation is considering two alternatives that are code-named M and N. Costs associated with the alternatives are listed below: Alternative M Alternative N Supplies costs $ 82,000 $ 69,000 Assembly costs $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Power costs $ 30,000 $ 45,500 Inspection costs $ 43,000 $ 32,000 Required: a. Which costs are relevant and which are not relevant in the choice between these two alternatives? b. What is the differential cost between the two alternatives? a. Supplies costs Assembly...
The following annual costs are associated with two new extruder machines being considered for use in...
The following annual costs are associated with two new extruder machines being considered for use in a Styrofoam cup plant. Data X X-Trud Useful Life, Years 9 13 First Cost $2,300,000 $2,780,000 Salvage Value $82,000 $118,000 Annual Benefit ($/year) $580,000 $670,000 Operations and Maintenance Costs, $/year $65,000 $78,000 Operations & Maintenance Gradient, $/year (starting at year 2) $11,000 $15,000 The company's interest rate (MARR) is 12%. Which extruder should the Styrofoam company choose? Use Annual Cash Flow Analysis. Complete the...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for the environmental protection equipment at a petroleum refinery....
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for the environmental protection equipment at a petroleum refinery. One of these alternatives must be selected. a. Which environmental protection equipment alternative should be​ selected? The​ firm's MARR is ​20% per year. Assume the equipment will be needed indefinitely. Assume repeatability is appropriate for this comparison. b. Assume the study period is shortened to five years. The market value of Alternative B after five years is estimated to be ​$16000. Which alternative would...
Two alternatives to investing in an e-commerce business with a five-year horizon are being considered. The...
Two alternatives to investing in an e-commerce business with a five-year horizon are being considered. The first alternative (A) has an initial investment cost of 21,000 Euros and it is estimated that an additional investment cost of 10,000 Euros will be required in the third year (due to the necessary adjustment of the content in the online material). Benefits of around 12,000 Euros per year are expected and the entire investment will have a final value estimated at 15,000 Euros...
Two alternatives for purchasing a new printing machine (from providers A and B) are being considered...
Two alternatives for purchasing a new printing machine (from providers A and B) are being considered for a production upgrade of a printing facility. Alternative A has a life of 2 years, first cost of $1200, annual reduction in maintenance cost (can be treated as revenue in this cash flow) of $650, and salvage value after 2 years of $250. Alternative B has a life of 3 years, first cost of $1650, annual reduction in maintenance cost of $790, and...
Two alternatives for purchasing a new printing machine (from providers A and B) are being considered...
Two alternatives for purchasing a new printing machine (from providers A and B) are being considered for a production upgrade of a printing facility. Alternative A has a life of 2 years, first cost of $1200, annual reduction in maintenance cost (can be treated as revenue in this cash flow) of $650, and salvage value after 2 years of $250. Alternative B has a life of 3 years, first cost of $1650, annual reduction in maintenance cost of $790, and...
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 10% per year. A decision maker must select one of these alternatives. A B Investment cost $50,000 $30,000 Annual Revenue 15,000 10,000 Salvage value 5,000 3,000 Useful life (yrs.) 5 5 For all parts below, do not convert from another form of equivalent worth; e.g., AW→FW. 1. Compute the AW for Alt A. Based on this measure, should the...
9-41 A do-nothing and two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for reducing traffic congestion. User...
9-41 A do-nothing and two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for reducing traffic congestion. User benefits come from reduced congestion once the project is complete, while user disbenefits are due to increased congestion during construction. The interest rate is 8%, and the life of each alternative is 15 years. Which alternative should be chosen? Alternative A B User benefits ($M/yr) 2.1 2.6 User disbenefits ($M) 1.2 2.1 First cost ($M) 6.9 9.9 (a) Use the benefit-cost ratio. (b) Use...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the present. However, the pattern of revenue from them is different. Alternative A has the potential to bring more revenues later in the project life. The expected revenues of alternative A are: $350, $500, and $850 by the ends of years one to three, respectively. Alternative B promises more immediate cash inflow which is expected to diminish with time: $750, $300, and $100 by the...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the present. However, the pattern of revenue from them is different. Alternative A has the potential to bring more revenues later in the project life. The expected revenues of alternative A are: $350, $500, and $850 by the ends of years one to three, respectively. Alternative B promises more immediate cash inflow which is expected to diminish with time: $750, $300, and $100 by the...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT