Question

In: Operations Management

Martin Martindale, the 40-year-old founder and president of Martindale Corporation (an accrual-basis, calendar-year C corporation), owns...

Martin Martindale, the 40-year-old founder and president of Martindale Corporation (an accrual-basis, calendar-year C corporation), owns 60 percent of the stock and receives a salary of $600,000. Four unrelated shareholders own the rest of the stock equally. The corporation has paid dividends regularly to the shareholders and plans to continue to do so in the future. Martin plans to recommend that the board of directors authorize the payment of a bonus to himself and two other employees (all cash-basis, calendar-year individuals). The first employee is the vice president, who owns 10 percent of the corporation and receives a salary of $400,000. The other employee is the controller, who is not currently a shareholder in the corporation and receives a salary of $200,000. Martin would like the bonus to equal 75 percent of each recipient’s current salary. Martin believes that the total compensation is probably a little high when compared to the corporation’s competitors but Martindale is much more profitable. Martindale’s profits have increased by more than 20 percent in the last two years due to the efforts of the individuals who will receive the bonuses, while other businesses in the same industry showed an increase in profits of less than 10 percent. Martin asks you, as the corporation’s tax advisor, to recommend what the corporation needs to do so that it gets a deduction for the planned bonuses. Martin would prefer to pay the bonuses next year but deduct them this year.

  1. Locate and read Mayson Manufacturing Co., 178 F.2d 115, 38 AFTR 1028, 49–2 USTC 9467 (CA6, 1949) and Elliotts Inc. 716 F.2d 1241, 52 AFTR 2d 83-5976, 83-2 USTC ¶9610 (CA9, 1985). Summarize the important points of these cases as they relate to Martindale.
  2. Prepare a summary of the relevant Code and regulation sections as they apply to Martindale.
  3. Prepare a one-paragraph summary for Martin on what the corporation needs to do to qualify for a deduction for the planned bonuses.

Solutions

Expert Solution

PLEASE LIKE THIS ANSWER, IT HELPS ME A LOT. THANK YOU!!!

Locate and read Mayson Manufacturing Co., 178 F.2d 115, 38 AFTR 1028, 49–2 USTC 9467 (CA6, 1949) and Elliotts Inc. 716 F.2d 1241, 52 AFTR 2d 83-5976, 83-2 USTC ¶9610 (CA9, 1985). Summarize the important points of these cases as they relate to Martindale.

In the case of Mayson Manufacturing, the IRS disallowed a portion of the compensation paid to three officers as being unreasonable in amount. The facts state that the Petitioner felt that the company would prosper more if a bonus system was established for Mayson Manufacturing Co. In this case, the board agreed to bonuses based on a percentage of the net profits and a percentage of gross sales. The Tax Court ruled in favor of the IRS. The Tax Court’s ruling was based in part upon its finding that the compensation, including the basic salary and bonus, paid to Mayson’s officers did not result from an arm’s length transaction. The Appellate Court stated that each case of this kind must be based on the individual company’s facts and circumstances. Some of the factors to be considered include

  • The employee’s qualifications
  • The nature, extent and scope of the employee’s work
  • The size and complexities of the business
  • A comparison of salaries paid with the gross and net income of the business
  • The prevailing general economic conditions
  • A comparison of salaries with distributions to stockholders
  • The prevailing rates of compensation for comparable positions
  • The amount of compensation paid to the employee in previous years
  • The salary policy of the corporation

The Appellate Court found that the basic salary and bonus plan was, in fact, made in good faith. Furthermore, no evidence was introduced by either party in regard to what compensation other companies engaged in the same type of work paid for comparable services during the year in question. Such evidence, if available would have a bearing upon the issue. The Appellate Court held that the facts in Mayson suggested the amounts paid as compensation were reasonable.

Prepare a summary of the relevant Code and regulation sections as they apply to Martindale.

Sec. 162(a)(1) allows a reasonable deduction for salaries or other compensation.

Sec. 267 states that a deduction is not allowed for compensation accrued to a "related party" until the payment is made. This section defines a "related" taxpayer to include a shareholder owning more than 50% of the corporation (Martin).

Reg. Sec. 1.404(a)-1(b) states that in determining what is considered reasonable compensation, personal services actually rendered in prior years as well as the current year and all compensation paid to the employee should be considered.

Reg. Sec. 1.404(b)-1T(b)(1) states that payment made after the fifteenth day of the third calendar month after the employer's taxable year in which the services are rendered will be considered deferred compensation. This means it will not be deductible until the year paid and included in the income of the employee.

Prepare a one-paragraph summary for Martin on what the corporation needs to do to qualify for a deduction for the planned bonuses.

a. In order to qualify for a deduction for the planned bonuses, the bonus plan must be considered reasonable. The factors to consider as to reasonableness are those listed in the Mayson Manufacturing case. The corporation will need to be able to justify the reasoning for salaries that exceed the norm in the industry. Rather than base the bonus plan on a percentage of the employee’s salaries, it might be better to pay a bonus based on the percentage of income or sales of the company. In addition, Martindale Corporation must pay the bonus to Martin before December 31 if it wants to deduct his bonus in the current year. For the other two employees, the liability for their bonuses must be determined by December 31 and then paid by March 15th next year if it wants to deduct these bonuses in the current year.


Related Solutions

On Jan 1, 2017, NSP Corporation, a calendar year, accrual basis C corporation was organized and...
On Jan 1, 2017, NSP Corporation, a calendar year, accrual basis C corporation was organized and began business operations. NSP provides network security protection services for businesses. During 2017, it had financial income (per books) before tax of $1,000,000. The following items were expensed in the arriving at NSP’s 2017 financial income (per books): -$20,000 of organization costs to organize the corporation; the federal tax amortization amounted to $6,000. -$20,000 increase to its allowance for doubtful accounts; actual bad debts...
On Jan 1, 2017, NSP Corporation, a calendar year, accrual basis C corporation was organized and...
On Jan 1, 2017, NSP Corporation, a calendar year, accrual basis C corporation was organized and began business operations. NSP provides network security protection services for businesses. During 2017, it had financial income (per books) before tax of $1,000,000. The following items were expensed in the arriving at NSP’s 2017 financial income (per books): -$20,000 of organization costs to organize the corporation; the federal tax amortization amounted to $6,000. -$20,000 increase to its allowance for doubtful accounts; actual bad debts...
On January 1, 2018, Hire Now Corporation, a calendar year, accrual basis C corporation was organized...
On January 1, 2018, Hire Now Corporation, a calendar year, accrual basis C corporation was organized and began business operations. Hire Now provides HR consulting services for businesses. During 2018, it had financial income (per books) before tax of $3,000,000. The following items were expensed in arriving at Hire Now’s 2018 financial income (per books): ·        $200,000 straight-line financial depreciation; total federal tax depreciation amounted to $900,000. ·        $30,000 increase to its allowance for doubtful accounts; actual bad debts written...
Michelle owns 100% of Kappa Corporation's common stock.Kappa is an accrual basis, calendar year corporation.Michelle formed...
Michelle owns 100% of Kappa Corporation's common stock.Kappa is an accrual basis, calendar year corporation.Michelle formed the corporation six years ago by transferring $175,000 of cash in exchange for the Kappa stock. Thus, she has held the stock for six years and has a $175,000 adjusted basis in the stock. Kappa's balance sheet at January 1 of the current year is as follows: Assets Basis FMV Cash $470,000 $470,000 Marketable securities 30,000 105,000 Inventory 350,000 390,000 Equipment 240,000 285,000 Building...
Western Corporation, a calendar year, accrual basis corporation, reported $500,000 of net income after tax on...
Western Corporation, a calendar year, accrual basis corporation, reported $500,000 of net income after tax on its 2019 financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. The corporation’s books and records reveal the following information: Western’s book income included $15,000 of dividends, received from a domestic corporation in which Western owns less than 1 percent of the outstanding stock. Western’s depreciation expense per books was $55,000, and its MACRS depreciation was $70,000. Western earned $5,000 of interest from municipal bonds and...
Reliable Manufacturing, Inc. is a calendar year, accrual method C Corporation that is the business of...
Reliable Manufacturing, Inc. is a calendar year, accrual method C Corporation that is the business of manufacturing widgets. Its taxable income averages $2,000,000 each year. On June 1, 2010, Reliable Manufacturer purchased a new manufacturing building in Minneapolis for $2,500,00. The land was allocated $500,000 and the building was allocated $2,000,000 of the purchase price. The building will be placed in service immediately upon purchase. Reliable Manufacturer occupied the building from June 1, 2010 through October 29, 2017. Reliable Manufacturer...
Copier Choice Corporation (CCC) is a calendar year, accrual method, C corporation engaged in the business...
Copier Choice Corporation (CCC) is a calendar year, accrual method, C corporation engaged in the business of selling, leasing, and servicing copiers primarily to service businesses such as accounting and law firms. During the fourth quarter of 2017, CCC received the following two payments: -Service payment: CCC received a $375,000 fee for a 15-month service contract on 375 copiers sold be CCC in Oct of 2017 to a national law firm. Under the terms of the contract, CCC will provide...
Question Andersen Corporation, a calendar year, accrual method, C-Corporation, is in the business of manufacturing glass...
Question Andersen Corporation, a calendar year, accrual method, C-Corporation, is in the business of manufacturing glass based product. In 2018, Andersen Corporation had taxable income before any limitations of $500,000. Andersen Corporation’s had average annual gross receipts over the previous three tax years of $27,000,000. The following items of income and deductions are included in the computation of taxable income: ·        $400,000 interest expense ·        $250,000 depreciation ·        $30,000 interest income ·        $75,000 amortization ·        $100,000 research and development expenses...
Matulis, Inc., a calendar year C corporation, owns a single asset with a basis of $325,000 and a fair market value of $800,000.
Matulis, Inc., a calendar year C corporation, owns a single asset with a basis of $325,000 and a fair market value of $800,000. Matulis holds a positive E & P balance. The entity elects S corporation status for 2020 and then sells the asset. Compute the corporate-level built-in gains tax that must be paid by Matulis.
Matulis, Inc., a calendar year C corporation, owns a single asset with a basis of $325,000 and a fair market value of $800,000.
Matulis, Inc., a calendar year C corporation, owns a single asset with a basis of $325,000 and a fair market value of $800,000. Matulis holds a positive E & P balance. The entity elects S corporation status for 2020 and then sells the asset. Compute the corporate-level built-in gains tax that must be paid by Matulis.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT