In: Statistics and Probability
A study of the effect of television commercials on 12-year-old children measured their attention span, in seconds. The commercials were for clothes, food, and toys.
Clothes | Food | Toys |
22 | 49 | 50 |
20 | 33 | 53 |
48 | 38 | 42 |
35 | 51 | 55 |
28 | 47 | 63 |
31 | 42 | 53 |
17 | 34 | 48 |
31 | 43 | 58 |
20 | 57 | 47 |
47 | 51 | |
44 | 51 | |
54 | ||
solutions:
Here we are going to perform one way anova to check there a difference in the mean attention span of the children for the various commercials.
So the procedure for performing one way anova is given below
Conclusion :It is concluded that the null hypothesis Ho is rejected. Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that clothes, food, and toys population means are not equal, at the α=0.05 significance level.
so from above we have
1)Complete the ANOVA table. Use 0.05 significance level. (Round the SS and MS values to 1 decimal place and F value to 2 decimal places.)
ANOVA | ||||||
Source of Variation | SS | df | MS | F | P-value | F crit |
Between Groups | 2936.0 | 2 | 1468.0 | 25.34 | 4.31169E-07 | 3.33 |
Within Groups | 1679.9 | 29 | 57.9 | |||
Total | 4615.9 | 31 |
2)
SUMMARY | ||||
Groups | Count | Sum | Average | Variance |
Clothes | 9.000 | 252.000 | 28.000 | 94.000 |
Food | 12.000 | 539.000 | 44.917 | 55.720 |
Toys | 11.000 | 571.000 | 51.909 | 31.491 |
3)
Is there a difference in the mean attention span of the children for the various commercials?
from anova table
Since F cal = 25.34 > F crit =3.33 It is concluded that the null hypothesis Ho is rejected. Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that clothes, food, and toys population means are not equal, at the α=0.05 significance level.
4) Are there significant differences between pairs of means?
If the null hypothesis is computed, you will need to conduct a Post-Hoc test. to check there significant differences between pairs of means?
so we will perform Fisher's LSD to check Fisher's LSD.
so from above table we can the p-values for all pairs are < 0.05 level of significance so we reject null hypothesis and conclude that there significant differences between all pairs of means.