In: Finance
Island Airlines Inc. needs to replace a short-haul commuter plane on one of its busier routes. Two aircraft are on the market that satisfy the general requirements of the route. One is more expensive than the other but has better fuel efficiency and load-bearing characteristics, which result in better long-term profitability. The useful life of both planes is expected to be about seven years, after which time both are assumed to have no value. Cash flow projections for the two aircraft follow.
Low Cost | High Cost | |
Initial cost | $775,000 | $925,000 |
Cash inflows, years 1 through 7 | 154,000 | 167,300 |
Low Cost | years |
High Cost | years |
Low Cost | % |
High Cost | % |
Low Cost | High Cost | |
NPV | $ | $ |
PI |
Low Cost | High Cost | ||
2% | NPV | $ | $ |
PI | |||
4% | NPV | $ | $ |
PI | |||
6% | NPV | $ | $ |
PI | |||
8% | NPV | $ | $ |
PI | |||
10% | NPV | $ | $ |
PI |
Low cost option:
Formula | Year (n) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
Cash flow (CF) | (775,000) | 154,000 | 154,000 | 154,000 | 154,000 | 154,000 | 154,000 | 154,000 | |
(CCFn-1 + CFn) | Cumulative cash flow (CCF) | (775,000) | (621,000) | (467,000) | (313,000) | (159,000) | (5,000) | 149,000 | 303,000 |
(-CCFn-1/CFn) | Fraction of year 6 (F) | 0.03 | |||||||
(5 + F) years | Payback period | 5.03 | |||||||
(Using IRR function) | IRR | 9.00% |
High cost option:
Formula | Year (n) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
Cash flow (CF) | (925,000) | 167,300 | 167,300 | 167,300 | 167,300 | 167,300 | 167,300 | 167,300 | |
(CCFn-1 + CFn) | Cumulative cash flow (CCF) | (925,000) | (757,700) | (590,400) | (423,100) | (255,800) | (88,500) | 78,800 | 2,46,100 |
(-CCFn-1/CFn) | Fraction of year 6 (F) | 0.53 | |||||||
(5 + F) years | Payback period | 5.53 | |||||||
(Using IRR function) | IRR | 6.27% |
a). Payback period: Low cost - 5.03 years; High cost - 5.53 years
Low cost option is better based on payback period.
b). IRR: Low cost - 9%; High cost - 6.27%
Low cost option is better based on IRR also.
c). Based on payback period and IRR, low cost option is a better choice than the high cost option.
d).
Low cost | High cost | ||
Formula | Life (l) (in years) | 7 | 7 |
Discount rate (d) | 5% | 5% | |
Initial cost (a) | (775,000) | (925,000) | |
Cash inflow/year (b) | 154,000 | 167,300 | |
(1 - (1+d)^-l)/d | PVFA | 5.7864 | 5.7864 |
(b*PVFA) | PV of cash inflows ('c) | 891,102 | 968,060 |
(a+c) | NPV | 116,102 | 43,060 |
(c/-a) | Profitability Index (PI) | 1.15 | 1.05 |
Both NPV and PI methods select the low cost plane as the better option of the two.
e).
Discount rate | Low cost | High cost | |
2% | NPV | 221,687 | 157,764 |
PI | 1.29 | 1.17 | |
4% | NPV | 149,316 | 79,144 |
PI | 1.19 | 1.09 | |
6% | NPV | 84,687 | 8,932 |
PI | 1.11 | 1.01 | |
8% | NPV | 26,781 | (53,974) |
PI | 1.03 | 0.94 | |
10% | NPV | (25,264) | (110,514) |
PI | 0.97 | 0.88 |
(Note: the valuation tables for these scenarios cannot be posted here due to the word answer limit.)
As can be seen from the table, at every discount rate, low cost plane is a better option than the high cost one.
f).