In: Finance
The Karns Oil Company is deciding whether to drill for oil on a tract of land that the company owns. The company estimates the project would cost $10 million today. Karns estimates that, once drilled, the oil will generate positive net cash flows of $4.6 million a year at the end of each of the next 4 years. Although the company is fairly confident about its cash flow forecast, in 2 years it will have more information about the local geology and about the price of oil. Karns estimates that if it waits 2 years then the project would cost $12.5 million. Moreover, if it waits 2 years, then there is a 90% chance that the net cash flows would be $5.2 million a year for 4 years and a 10% chance that they would be $2.8 million a year for 4 years. Assume all cash flows are discounted at 11%.
All financials below are in $ mn
Part (a)
Initial investment, C0 = 10
Annual cash flows, C = 4.6 over N = 4 years, Discount rate = R = 11%
Hence, PV of annual cash flows = PV of annuity = C / R x [1 - (1 + R)-N] = 4.6 / 11% x [1 - (1 + 11%)-4] = 14.27
Hence, NPV = -C0 + PV of annual cash flows = -10 +14.27 = 4.27
Hence,your answer should be: $ 4.27 million
Part (b)
Please see the decision tree below:
On 90% node, PV of annual cash flows = C / R x [1 - (1 + R)-N] = 5.2 / 11% x [1 - (1 + 11%)-4] = 16.13
On 10% node, PV of annual cash flows = C / R x [1 - (1 + R)-N] = 2.8 / 11% x [1 - (1 + 11%)-4] = 8.69
Hence, expected PV of annual cash flows = 0.9 x 16.13 + 0.10 x 8.69 = 15.39
Hence, NPV = -C0 + 15.39 = -12.5 + 15.39 = 2.89
Since NPV of part (a) > NPV of part (b), it makes sense to drill today. Hence, your answer should be:
No, it makes sense to drill today