In: Finance
CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA
A firm with a 13% WACC is evaluating two projects for this year's capital budget. After-tax cash flows, including depreciation, are as follows:
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Project M | -$12,000 | $4,000 | $4,000 | $4,000 | $4,000 | $4,000 |
Project N | -$36,000 | $11,200 | $11,200 | $11,200 | $11,200 | $11,200 |
Calculate NPV for each project. Round your answers to the
nearest cent. Do not round your intermediate calculations.
Project M $
Project N $
Calculate IRR for each project. Round your answers to two
decimal places. Do not round your intermediate calculations.
Project M %
Project N %
Calculate MIRR for each project. Round your answers to two
decimal places. Do not round your intermediate calculations.
Project M %
Project N %
Calculate payback for each project. Round your answers to two
decimal places. Do not round your intermediate calculations.
Project M years
Project N years
Calculate discounted payback for each project. Round your
answers to two decimal places. Do not round your intermediate
calculations.
Project M years
Project N years
Notice that the projects have the same cash flow timing pattern. Why is there a conflict between NPV and IRR?
-The conflict between NPV and IRR is due to the fact that the cash flows are in the form of an annuity. -The conflict between NPV and IRR is due to the difference in the timing of the cash flows. -There is no conflict between NPV and IRR. -The conflict between NPV and IRR occurs due to the difference in the size of the projects. -The conflict between NPV and IRR is due to the relatively high discount rate.
Please explain step by step and in simplest terms as possible. Thank You
Project M
NPV = -$12,000 + ($4,000)(3.517) = $866.20
Using Present value of an annuity of $1 table
IRR using a spreadsheet = 19.86%
Modified IRR (MIRR) calculations:
Future value of cash flows re-invested at the WACC of 13%:
Year 1 CF = $4,000(1.13)4 = $6,521.894
Year 2 CF = $4,000(1.13)3 = $5,771.58
Year 3 CF = $4,000(1.13)2 = $5,107.60
Year 4 CF = $4,000(1.13)1 = $4,520.00
Year 5 CF = $4,000
Terminal value = $25,921.074
PV of Project cost = $12,000
$12,000 = $25,921.074/ (1 + MIRR)5 Þ MIRR = 0.1665 (16.65%)
Payback period = $12,000 / $4,000 = 3.00 years
Discounted payback period calculations:
Year 1 discounted CF = $4,000 / 1.13 = $3,539.823
Year 2 discounted CF = $4,000 / (1.13)2 = $3132.586
Year 3 discounted CF = $4,000 / (1.13)3 = $2772.20
Year 4 discounted CF = $4,000 / (1.13)4 = $2,453.27
Year 5 discounted CF = $4,000 / (1.13)5 = $2,171.039
Discounted payback period = 4 + ($102.57/$2,171.039) = 4.047 years
Project N
NPV = -$36,000 + ($11,200)(3.517) = $3,390.4
IRR using a spreadsheet = 16.80%
Modified IRR (MIRR) calculations:
Future value of cash flows re-invested at the WACC of 13%:
Year 1 CF = $11,200(1.13)4 = $18,261.3044
Year 2 CF = $11,200 (1.13)3 = $16,160.4464
Year 3 CF = $11,200 (1.13)2 = $14,301.28
Year 4 CF = $11,200 (1.13)1 = $12,656.00
Year 5 CF = $11,200
Terminal value = $72,579.0308
PV of Project cost = $36,000
$36,000 =$72,579.0308/ (1 + MIRR)5 Þ MIRR = 0.1505 (15.05%)
Payback period = $36,000 / $11,200 = 3.21 years
Discounted payback period calculations:
Year 1 discounted CF = $11,200 / 1.13= $9,911.50
Year 2 discounted CF = $11,200 / (1.13)2 = $8,771.24
Year 3 discounted CF = $11,200 / (1.13)3 = $7,762.16
Year 4 discounted CF = $11,200 / (1.13)4 = $6,869.16
Year 5 discounted CF = $11,200 / (1.13)5 = $6,078.911
Discounted payback period = 4 + ($2,685.94/$6,078.911) = 4.441 years
b) Assuming the projects are independent, which one(s) would you recommend?
If the projects are independent, both would be accepted since they both have positive NPVs.
c) If the projects are mutually exclusive, which would you recommend?
If the projects are mutually exclusive then only one can be accepted, and Project N would be recommended as it has a higher NPV, even though its IRR and MIRR are lower.
d) Notice that the projects have the same cash flow timing pattern. Why is there a conflict between NPV and IRR?
The conflict between NPV and IRR most likely occurs due to the difference in the size of the projects, as Project N is three times larger than Project M.