In: Statistics and Probability
PLEASE EXPLAIN. THANK YOU!
DataActivity
1. A random sample of 36 skeletal remains from females was taken from data stored in the Forensic Anthropology Data Bank (FDB) at the University of Tennessee. The femur lengths (right leg) in millimeters are recorded below.
432 |
432 |
435 |
460 |
432 |
440 |
448 |
449 |
434 |
443 |
525 |
451 |
448 |
443 |
450 |
467 |
436 |
423 |
475 |
435 |
433 |
438 |
453 |
438 |
435 |
413 |
439 |
442 |
507 |
424 |
468 |
419 |
434 |
483 |
448 |
514 |
b. Since the sample size is large, we can use the sample standard s in place of σ in calculations of confidence intervals.
c. Before doing any calculations, think about a 90%, 95% and 99% confidence for µ, the mean femur bone length for women. Which of these intervals would be the widest? Which would be the narrowest? Explain how you know without calculating the confidence intervals.
d. Calculate 90%, 95%, and 99% confidence intervals for µ, the mean femur bone length for adult females. Do your results confirm your answer to (c)?
e Redo the 95% confidence interval using the 68-95-99.7 Rule.
Comment on the difference between this and the answer you got in
part d.
f. How much can a single outlier affect a confidence interval? Suppose that the first observation of 432 millimeters had been mistakenly entered as 4.32 millimeters.
(i) Make a boxplot of the modified data set to show that this short femur length is an outlier.
(ii) Recalculate the 95% confidence interval based on the modified data. How much did the outlier affect the confidence interval?