In: Statistics and Probability
Please clearly state the step number next to the answers given, thank you!
A random sample of 12 supermarkets from Region 1 had mean sales of 72.4 with a standard deviation of 6.2. A random sample of 16 supermarkets from Region 2 had a mean sales of 78.3 with a standard deviation of 5.3. Does the test marketing reveal a difference in potential mean sales per market in Region 2? Let μ1 be the mean sales per market in Region 1 and μ2 be the mean sales per market in Region 2. Use a significance level of α=0.05 for the test. Assume that the population variances are not equal and that the two populations are normally distributed.
Step 1 of 4: State the null and alternative
hypotheses for the test.
Step 2 of 4: Compute the value of the t test
statistic. Round your answer to three decimal
places.
Step 3 of 4: Determine the decision rule for
rejecting the null hypothesis H0. Round your answer to
three decimal places. (e.g. Reject H0 if t or
|t| is < or > ___________)
Step 4 of 4: State the test's conclusion. (Reject
or Fail to Reject)
The provided sample means are shown below:
Also, the provided sample standard deviations are:
and the sample sizes are
Step 1
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:
This corresponds to a two-tailed test, for which a t-test for two population means, with two independent samples, with unknown population standard deviations will be used.
Step 2
Test Statistics
Since it is assumed that the population variances are unequal, the t-statistic is computed as follows:
Step 3
Rejection Region
Based on the information provided, the significance level is α=0.05, and the degrees of freedom are df=21.603. In fact, the degrees of freedom are computed assuming that the population variances are unequal.
Hence, it is found that the critical value for this two-tailed test is tc=2.076, for α=0.05 and df=21.603.
The rejection region for this two-tailed test is R={t:∣t∣>2.076}.
Step 4
Decision about the null hypothesis
Since it is observed that ∣t∣=2.649>tc=2.076, it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Using the P-value approach: The p-value is p=0.0148, and since p=0.0148<0.05, it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected. It is concluded that the null hypothesis Ho is rejected. Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that population mean μ1 is different than μ2, at the 0.05 significance level.
Graphically
Let me know in the comments if anything is not clear. I will reply ASAP! Please do upvote if satisfied!