Question

In: Civil Engineering

Indicate 2 different rights in the Bill of Rights that the U.S. Supreme Court still has...

Indicate 2 different rights in the Bill of Rights that the U.S. Supreme Court still has not incorporated and made applicable to the states through the Due Process Clause of the 14 th Amendment? Be specific and indicate the right AND the Amendment where that right is found in the Bill of Rights.

Solutions

Expert Solution

*Incorporation, in United States law, is the doctrine by which portions of the Bill of Rightshave been made applicable to the states. When the Bill of Rights was ratified, courts held that its protections only extended to the actions of the federal government and that the Bill of Rights did not place limitations on the authority of state and local governments. However, the post-Civil War era, beginning in 1865 with the Thirteenth Amendment, which declared the abolition of slavery, gave rise to the incorporation of other Amendments, providing more rights to the states and people over time. Gradually, various portions of the Bill of Rights have been held to be applicable to state and local governments by incorporation through the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 and the Fifteenth Amendment in 1870.

*Prior to the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment and the development of the incorporation doctrine, the Supreme Court in 1833 held in Barron v. Baltimore that the Bill of Rights applied only to the federal, but not any state governments. Even years after the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court in United States v. Cruikshank(1876) still held that the First and Second Amendment did not apply to state governments. However, beginning in the 1920s, a series of United States Supreme Court decisions interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment to "incorporate" most portions of the Bill of Rights, making these portions, for the first time, enforceable against the state governments.

*Many of the provisions of the First Amendment were applied to the States in the 1930s and 1940s, but most of the procedural protections provided to criminal defendants were not enforced against the States until the Warren Court of the 1960s, famous for its concern for the rights of those accused of crimes, brought state standards in line with federal requirements. The following list enumerates, by amendment and individual clause, the Supreme Court cases that have incorporated the rights contained in the Bill of Rights. (The Ninth Amendment is not listed; its wording indicates that it "is not a source of rights as such; it is simply a rule about how to read the Constitution."[23] The Tenth Amendment is also not listed; by its wording, it is a reservation of powers to the states and to the people.)

Amendment:1

Guarantee against establishment of religion

Amendment 2:

Right to keep and bear arms

Amendment 3:

Freedom from quartering of soldiers

Amendment 4:

Unreasonable search and seizure

Amendment 5b

Right to indictment by a grand jury

Amendment 6:

Right to a speedy trial

Amendment 7:

Right to jury trial in civil cases

Amendment 8:

Protection against excessive bail


Related Solutions

In Griswold v. Connecticut, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that “specific guarantees in the Bill of...
In Griswold v. Connecticut, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that “specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras, formed by emanations from those guarantees that help give them life and substance.” 1. Discuss the meaning and implications of Griswold’s penumbras and emanations 2. Describe the legal basis for an unenumerated right that might be located within these purported constitutional regions.
According to the U.S. Supreme Court, what is not to be considered "community" under the current...
According to the U.S. Supreme Court, what is not to be considered "community" under the current test for determining if speech is obscene?
In Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court decided...
In Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court decided a case in which landowners challenged the power of a city in Connecticut to take their property for redevelopment. The redevelopment plan did not contemplate that all of the land would be open to the public. Parts would be privately developed. The plaintiffs alleged that the taking was unconstitutional because it was not for a public purpose. The Supreme Court rejected this claim. Use...
Why might the U.S. Supreme Court have said that LGBT marriage is a liberty that should...
Why might the U.S. Supreme Court have said that LGBT marriage is a liberty that should be protected by due process of law?
In the Brown decision, the U.S. Supreme Court Decided that segregated public schools violated the 14th...
In the Brown decision, the U.S. Supreme Court Decided that segregated public schools violated the 14th Amendment. Explain their reasoning.
True or False--- In the Hartford Fire Insurance Co. case, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that...
True or False--- In the Hartford Fire Insurance Co. case, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that it could not assert jurisdiction over European companies in competition matters unless the companies had a direct physical presence in a U.S. state.
14 ) In U.S. Term Limits v Thornton, the Supreme Court ruled that the age, residency,...
14 ) In U.S. Term Limits v Thornton, the Supreme Court ruled that the age, residency, and citizenship requirements set forth in the Constitution were a complete statement of Congressional eligibility standards and that the only way to add any eligibility requirements would be through a constitutional amendment. True or False 15) Each state is given a number of Electoral College votes equal to its combined number of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate. True or...
Below is a list of the top nine longest serving U.S. Supreme Court Justices, along with...
Below is a list of the top nine longest serving U.S. Supreme Court Justices, along with the current Chief Justice of the court: Name                         Length of Service (in years) William O. Douglas              36 Stephen Johnson Field      34 John Paul Stevens              34 John Marshall                      34 Hugo Black                           34 John Marshall Harlan         33 William J. Brennan              33 Joseph Story                         33 James Moore Wayne          32 John Roberts                          13 Please provide the following information (1 pt. each): a. M years...
Five years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court chose to hear a case in which a man...
Five years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court chose to hear a case in which a man was arrested by the Secret Service in 2006 for going up to then-Vice President Cheney and telling him that he was wrong about his decision to go into Iraq. The man sued the Secret Service for arresting him, saying that the First Amendment protects his right to criticize the government. The Court decided whether he had a First Amendment right to sue. In another...
United States v. Bailey United States Supreme Court 444 U.S. 394 (1980)
United States v. Bailey United States Supreme Court 444 U.S. 394 (1980)
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT