In: Statistics and Probability
In his Ph.D. dissertation, Dr. Moser found the following variances in a population of yearling Brangus cattle measured for fat thickness with ultrasound:
σ2BV = .001 cm2 σ2E = .009 cm2
Assuming variance of gene combination value is zero, calculate:
a. Phenotypic variance of fat thickness
b. Heritability of fat thickness
Based on the above, is a yearling heifer’s fat thickness a good indicator of her breeding value for that trait? Why or why not?
In her Ph.D. dissertation, Dr. Bormann found the following variances for age at first calving in a population of Angus cattle:
σ2BV = 767 d2 σ2E = 1395 d2
Assuming variance of gene combination value is zero, calculate:
a. Phenotypic variance of age at first calving
b. Heritability of age at first calving
Based on the above, is a yearling heifer’s age at first calving a good indicator of her breeding value for that trait? Why or why not?
Brangus Cattle:
Null Hypothesis: H0: Variance of gene combination value is zero
Alternate Hypothesis: H1: Variance is non zero
a. Variance(BV)=.001 cm2 and Variance(E)=0.009 cm2
Phenotypic Variance = 0.001+0.009 = 0.01 cm2
b. Heritability = H2 = V(Genetic) / V(Phenotypic)
= 0.001/0.01
= 0.1
Based on the above values we can say that, NO, yearling heifer’s fat thickness isn't a good indicator of her breeding value for that trait as the heritability is only about 10%.
Age at first calving:
Null Hypothesis: H0: Variance of gene combination value is zero
Alternate Hypothesis: H1: Variance is non zero
a. Phenotypic variance at the age of first calving = 767 + 1395 = 2162
b. Heritability at the age of first calving = 767/2162 = 0.35
Based on the above values we can say that, YES, yearling heifer’s fat thickness is a good indicator of her breeding value for that trait as the heritability is only about 35%.