In: Finance
It is sometimes stated that “the net present value approach assumes reinvestment of the intermediate cash flows at the required return.” Is this claim correct?
Yes , the above cliam is correct.
.
Let us assume the following cash flows for a project and required rate of return of the project to be 10%:
| Year | Cash Flows | 
| 0 | -10,000 | 
| 1 | 4,500 | 
| 2 | 4,500 | 
| 3 | 4,500 | 
.
Calculation of NPV in usual way:
| Year | Cash Flows | DF @ 10% | Present Value | 
| 0 | -10,000 | 1 | -10,000.00 | 
| 1 | 4,500 | 0.909090909 | 4,090.91 | 
| 2 | 4,500 | 0.826446281 | 3,719.01 | 
| 3 | 4,500 | 0.751314801 | 3,380.92 | 
| NPV: | 1,190.83 | 
.
Part-a:
Future value (as of the end of the project) of all the cash flows other than the initial outlay assuming they are reinvested at the required return is as follows:
| Year | Cash Flows | Working | Future Value | 
| 1 | 4,500 | 4500*1.10^2 | 5,445 | 
| 2 | 4,500 | 4500*1.10^1 | 4,950 | 
| 3 | 4,500 | 4500*1.10^0 | 4,500 | 
| Future Value | 14,895 | 
.
Part-b:
NPV of the project using the single future value calculated in the previous step and the initial outlay = Present Value of Future value (as of the end of the project) of all the cash flows as computed in part-a – Initial Investment
= 14,895/1.10^3 – 10,000
= 11,190.83 – 10,000
= $1,190.83
.
So, in both the cases NPV is coming $1,190.83 which proves the claim hat “the net present value approach assumes reinvestment of the intermediate cash flows at the required return.” is correct.