In: Finance
It is sometimes stated that “the net present value approach assumes reinvestment of the intermediate cash flows at the required return.” Is this claim correct?
Yes , the above cliam is correct.
.
Let us assume the following cash flows for a project and required rate of return of the project to be 10%:
Year | Cash Flows |
0 | -10,000 |
1 | 4,500 |
2 | 4,500 |
3 | 4,500 |
.
Calculation of NPV in usual way:
Year | Cash Flows | DF @ 10% | Present Value |
0 | -10,000 | 1 | -10,000.00 |
1 | 4,500 | 0.909090909 | 4,090.91 |
2 | 4,500 | 0.826446281 | 3,719.01 |
3 | 4,500 | 0.751314801 | 3,380.92 |
NPV: | 1,190.83 |
.
Part-a:
Future value (as of the end of the project) of all the cash flows other than the initial outlay assuming they are reinvested at the required return is as follows:
Year | Cash Flows | Working | Future Value |
1 | 4,500 | 4500*1.10^2 | 5,445 |
2 | 4,500 | 4500*1.10^1 | 4,950 |
3 | 4,500 | 4500*1.10^0 | 4,500 |
Future Value | 14,895 |
.
Part-b:
NPV of the project using the single future value calculated in the previous step and the initial outlay = Present Value of Future value (as of the end of the project) of all the cash flows as computed in part-a – Initial Investment
= 14,895/1.10^3 – 10,000
= 11,190.83 – 10,000
= $1,190.83
.
So, in both the cases NPV is coming $1,190.83 which proves the claim hat “the net present value approach assumes reinvestment of the intermediate cash flows at the required return.” is correct.