In: Accounting
The terms of the agreement between Willian and Penguin certainly do not seem fair. The contract provides for Penguin to repossess all items should there be a default even in one installment. Besides, the methodology of application of the installment on a pro rata basis ins unjustified. This is because,at any point in time some amount of money will be outstanding on any item. This will give a perpetual right to Penguin to repossess all the items even though practically some of the items would have been fully paid.
Clearly,the terms of the agreement are not fair to William. William will be under a constant threat of losing all the furniture at any point of time. Penguin has probably taken advantage of William's lack of understanding about the terms of the contract.
If Penguin has taken advantage of William's lack of knowledge about the terms, clearly this is unethical. However, if Penguin is the sole seller of furniture in that area,and therefore has a huge bargaining power, then contractually it seems fair though the terms are one sided. .