Question

In: Economics

Consider a two-period model in which the consumer receives income of y in the current period...

Consider a two-period model in which the consumer receives income of y in the current period and y' in the future period. Rather than imposing lump-sum taxes, the government imposes a proportional tax on consumption. In the current period the tax rate is σ and in the future period the tax rate is σ'. As a result, the government collects σc in goods in the current period and σ'c' in goods in the future period. Since G and G' are given, it follows that the present value of the revenue it collects per consumer, σc + σ'c'/(1 + r), equals a constant, G + G'/(1 + r).

a. In this economy the current-period budget constraint is given by (1+σ)c+s=y and the future-period budget constraint is given by (1+σ’)c’=y’+ (1+r)s. Show that these two period constraints imply that the consumer's lifetime budget constraint is given given by (1+σ)c+ (1+σ')c'/ 1+r = y+y'/1+r

b. Suppose that the government chooses to reduce σ and raise σ' such that it continues to collect the same amount of revenue in present value from each consumer (as it must). Explain why the consumer’s lifetime wealth is unaffected by the change in tax rates.

c. In this economy, MRSc,c' = (1+r)(1+σ)/1+σ'. Does MRSc,c'  increase or decrease when the government reduces σ and raises σ'? What does this imply about how equilibrium current and future consumption respond to the changes in the two tax rates given that the present value of taxes is unchanged?

d. Why does Ricardian equivalence fail to hold for this economy?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution:

given

a two-period model in which the consumer receives income of y in the current period and y' in the future period.

In the current period the tax rate is σ and in the future period the tax rate is σ'.

As a result, the government collects σc in goods in the current period and σ'c' in goods in the future period.

the present value of the revenue it collects per consumer, σc + σ'c'/(1 + r), equals a constant, G + G'/(1 + r).

(a) given

the current-period budget constraint is given by (1+σ)c+s=y

future-period budget constraint is given by (1+σ’)c’=y’+ (1+r)s

Showing  that these two period constraints imply that the consumer's lifetime budget constraint is given given by (1+σ)c+ (1+σ')c'/ 1+r = y+y'/1+r:

poof:

Y = C + I + G + X - M

Budgetary Deficits and Surpluses Rule

•Spending –Goods and services (G) + Transfers to persons (Tr)

•Revenue –Taxes (Tx)

•Net Taxes -Tx – Tr = NT

•Surplus

G + Tr < Tx

G < Tx – Tr

G < NT

•Deficit

G + Tr > Tx

G > Tx – Tr

G > NT

Hence

This depicts the given value of current period budget constraint as C+S=Y,

Like wise it was given future period budget constraint and lifetime budgetary constraint.

(b) given that the government chooses to reduce σ and raise σ' such that it continues to collect the same amount of revenue in present value from each consumer, the consumer’s lifetime wealth is unaffected by the change in tax rates:

reason;

By applying the above rule of budgetary deficit and surplus, consumers lifetime wealth is unaffected by changing the tax rates.

(c) given

MRSc,c' = (1+r)(1+σ)/1+σ'. Does MRSc,c'  

increase or decrease when the government reduces σ and raises σ' is:

ie

Marginal rate of substitution is MRS = =1+r

(d) Ricardian equivalence fail to hold for this economy :

because of all the above conditions the Ricardian equivalence fail to hold for this economy


Related Solutions

Fact I: A consumer receives income y in the current period, income y’ in the future...
Fact I: A consumer receives income y in the current period, income y’ in the future period, and pays taxes of t and t’ in the current and future periods, respectively. The consumer can lend at the real interest rate r. The consumer can borrow at the interest rate r but can only borrow an amount h or less, where h < we - y + t, with "we" denoting lifetime wealth. Clearly illustrate in a graph what happens to...
Assume a consumer who has current-period income y=200, future period income y’=150, current taxes t =...
Assume a consumer who has current-period income y=200, future period income y’=150, current taxes t = 40, and future taxes t’= 50, and faces a market interest rate of r=5 percent or .05. The consumer would like to consume such that c’=c*(1+r) if possible. However, this consumer is faced with a credit market imperfection, in that no borrowing is allowed. That is s must be greater or equal to zero.   a. Show the consumer’s lifetime budget constraint and indifference curves...
Fact I: A consumer receives income y in the currentperiod, income y’ in the future...
Fact I: A consumer receives income y in the current period, income y’ in the future period, and pays taxes of t and t’ in the current and future periods, respectively. The consumer can lend at the real interest rate r. The consumer can borrow at the interest rate r but can only borrow an amount h or less, where h < we - y + t, with "we" denoting lifetime wealth.Clearly illustrate in a graph what happens to the...
A consumer’s income in the current period is y =100, and income in the future period...
A consumer’s income in the current period is y =100, and income in the future period is y’=120. He or she pays lump-sum taxes t = 20 in the current period and t’=10 in the future period. The real interest rate is 0.1, or 10% per period. a) Determine the consumer’s lifetime wealth. b) Suppose that current and future consumption are perfect compliments for the consumer and that he or she always wants to have equal consumption in the current...
A consumer’s income in the current period is y =100, and income in the future period...
A consumer’s income in the current period is y =100, and income in the future period is y’=120. He or she pays lump-sum taxes t = 20 in the current period and t’=10 in the future period. The real interest rate is 0.1, or 10% per period. a) Determine the consumer’s lifetime wealth. b) Suppose that current and future consumption are perfect compliments for the consumer and that he or she always wants to have equal consumption in the current...
Consider a two-period consumption model where an individual has income It > 0 in period t...
Consider a two-period consumption model where an individual has income It > 0 in period t and the (net) interest rate is r > 0. However, suppose the price levels are not assumed to be 1. Instead, let p2 ≥ p1 > 0. (a) Derive the lifetime budget constraint. (b) What is the slope of the lifetime budget line? Letting 1 + π = p2/p1 bethe gross inflation rate, given an interpretation of the magnitude of them budget line. (c)...
In the two-period model of consumption, suppose that the first period income is $5,000 and the...
In the two-period model of consumption, suppose that the first period income is $5,000 and the second period income is $5,500 for both Jill and Jack. The interest rate is 10 percent. Jack’s lifetime utility function is ?1 + ?2 while Jill’s lifetime utility function is ?1 + 0.8?2. 1)Draw a graph that represents the common budget constraint that Jill and Jack face. 2)Draw indifference curves of Jill and Jack in separate graphs and compare the slopes of the indifference...
Two goods are in the consumer basket, goods X and Y. The consumer income is I,...
Two goods are in the consumer basket, goods X and Y. The consumer income is I, price of good X is Px, and price of good Y is Py. Use the consumer model to derive the demand curve for good X. Explain your answer in details. b. Using your answer in part a, clearly explain and show the substitution effect and the income effect.
Consider the two-period Neoclassical consumption model seen in class. Suppose that income is measured in dollars....
Consider the two-period Neoclassical consumption model seen in class. Suppose that income is measured in dollars. Let the utility function take the logarithmic form U(C)=ln C, and the representative consumer maximize her lifetime utility subject to her budget constraint. Suppose that income in period 1 is $50,000, income in period 2 is $30,000, ?=1 and ?=5%. Do you think that the consumption profile of the agent in this numerical example is going to be smoother than her income? If so,...
Consider a two-period model of mineral extraction with a 3% discount rate, in which the total...
Consider a two-period model of mineral extraction with a 3% discount rate, in which the total supply of minerals is fixed at 100. A social planner is trying to decide how much we should consume in each period (i.e. what the efficient consumption pattern would be). Q1 is our consumption in period 1; Q2 is our consumption in period 2. Prices (P1), marginal benefits (MB1), and marginal costs of extraction (MCE1) in period 1 are: P1 = MB1 = 80...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT