Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Years 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Retail Sales 5.2% 0.3%...

Years

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Retail Sales

5.2%

0.3%

-3.3%

3.0%

4.9%

3.9%

3.1%

4.2%

3.8%

3.9%

3.6%

e-commerce

Sales

19%

4.1%

2.8%

17.1%

17.5%

14.9%

13.0%

14.6%

14.7%

14.0%

16.0%

Does Retail Stores Growth Reduced by E-commerce Growth?

Null Hypothesis: Ho: Retail stores growth doesn’t reduce by E-commerce growth.

Alternative Hypothesis: Ha: Retail stores growth does reduce by E-commerce growth

Do the chi-square test for goodness of fit. with the level of significance is 0.05

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution:-

State the hypotheses. The first step is to state the null hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis.

Null hypothesis: Retail stores growth doesn’t reduce by E-commerce growth.

Alternative hypothesis: Retail stores growth does reduce by E-commerce growth.

Formulate an analysis plan. For this analysis, the significance level is 0.05. Using sample data, we will conduct a chi-square goodness of fit test of the null hypothesis.

Analyze sample data. Applying the chi-square goodness of fit test to sample data, we compute the degrees of freedom, the expected frequency counts, and the chi-square test statistic. Based on the chi-square statistic and the degrees of freedom, we determine the P-value.

DF = k - 1 = 11 - 1
D.F = 10
(Ei) = n * pi


X2 = 95.58

where DF is the degrees of freedom, k is the number of levels of the categorical variable, n is the number of observations in the sample, Ei is the expected frequency count for level i, Oi is the observed frequency count for level i, and X2 is the chi-square test statistic.

The P-value is the probability that a chi-square statistic having 11 degrees of freedom is more extreme than 95.58.

We use the Chi-Square Distribution Calculator to find P(X2 > 95.58) = less than 0.0001.

Interpret results. Since the P-value (almost 0) is less than the significance level (0.05), we have to reject the null hypothesis.

From the above test we can conclude that Retail stores growth does reduce by E-commerce growth.


Related Solutions

- 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 GREECE 129059 135314 153317 160986 168501...
- 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 GREECE 129059 135314 153317 160986 168501 167036 175100 181261 190523 SPAIN 377095 403834 419865 397462 427672 447048 451255 485805 497812 FRANCE 316137 322254 303269 303031 298203 297880 292160 302840 308629 CROATIA 24329 21862 18972 19366 18603 18930 18551 20798 21573 ITALY 494091 499885 476823 457078 443141 458020 461990 475164 501958 Selected 5 ports. a) Calculate the mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, maximum values of gross weight of goods handled in...
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Revenue 4,500 6,860 8,409 9,082...
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Revenue 4,500 6,860 8,409 9,082 9,808 10,593 11,440 12,355 13,344 14,411 Revenue Growth 52.4% 22.6% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% Production Costs Fixed Production Expense (excl depreciation) 575 575 587 598 610 622 635 648 660 674 Variable Production Costs 2,035 3,404 4,291 4,669 5,078 5,521 6,000 6,519 7,079 7,685 Depreciation 152 152 152 152 164 178 192 207 224 242 Total Production Costs 0 2,762 4,131...
India's Current Account Assumptions​ (millions USD) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013...
India's Current Account Assumptions​ (millions USD) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 ​Goods: exports ​77,939 ​102,175 ​123,876 ​153,530 ​199,065 ​167,958 ​230,967 ​307,847 ​298,321 ​319,110 ​329,633 ​Goods: imports ​-95,539 ​-134,692 ​-166,572 ​-208,611 ​-291,740 ​-247,908 ​-324,320 ​-428,021 ​-450,249 ​-433,760 ​-415,529      Balance on goods ​-17,600 ​-32,517 ​-42,696 ​-55,081 ​-92,675 ​-79,950 ​-93,353 ​-120,174 ​-151,928 ​-114,650 ​-85,895 ​Services: credit ​38,281 ​52,527 ​69,440 ​86,552 ​106,054 ​92,889 ​117,068 ​138,528 ​145,525 ​148,649 ​156,252 ​Services: debit ​-35,641 ​-47,287 ​-58,514 ​-70,175 ​-87,739 ​-80,349 ​-114,739 ​-125,041...
Using the data in the following​ table,    2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015 Stock A  ...
Using the data in the following​ table,    2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015 Stock A   -10%   20%   5%   -5%   2%   9% Stock B   21%   7%   30%   -3%   -8%   25% consider a portfolio that maintains a 50% weight on stock A and a 50% weight on stock B. a. What is the return each year of this​ portfolio? b. Based on your results from part ​(a​), compute the average return and volatility of the portfolio.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026...
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 BVPS, start of year 7 7.61 8.51 9.51 10.73 11.77 13.17 14.4 15.91 17.58 19.43 21.47 23.72 25.38 27.16 29.06 EPS 0.81 1.1 1.3 1.52 1.64 2 2.03 2.16 2.39 2.64 2.91 3.22 2.37 2.54 2.72 2.91 ROE 0.116 0.145 0.153 0.16 0.153 0.17 0.154 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Payout Ratio 0.247 0.182 0.231 0.197 0.366 0.3 0.394 0.3...
Suppose a firm has had the following historic sales figures. Year: 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013...
Suppose a firm has had the following historic sales figures. Year: 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013   Sales $ 2,500,000 $ 3,780,000 $ 4,340,000 $ 4,940,000 $ 5,510,000    What would be the forecast for next year’s sales using regression to estimate a trend?
Suppose a firm has had the following historic sales figures. Year: 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013...
Suppose a firm has had the following historic sales figures. Year: 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013   Sales: $ 2,430,000. $ 3,850,000 $ 4,440,000 $ 4,920,000 $ 5,540,000 What would be the forecast for next year’s sales using regression to estimate a trend? Next years sales?
Pepsi 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Sales/Revenue 66.42B 66.68B 63.05B 62.8B 63.53B Coca-Cola 2013 2014 2015...
Pepsi 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Sales/Revenue 66.42B 66.68B 63.05B 62.8B 63.53B Coca-Cola 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Sales/Revenue 46.76B 46B 43.7B 41.38B 35.02B Using the year 2013-2017 financial data of Coca-Cola and PepsiCo companies, determine their 5-year average growth rates related to net sales and income from continuing operations. Coca Cola: Net Sales: 7.86% Increase. PepsiCo: Net Sales: 3.11% Increase. And what data to use to calculate.
Year Annual Average CPI 2010 218.1 2011 224.9 2012 229.6 2013 232.9 2014 236.7 2015 237.0...
Year Annual Average CPI 2010 218.1 2011 224.9 2012 229.6 2013 232.9 2014 236.7 2015 237.0 2016 240.0 2017 245.1 2018 251.1 2019 255.6 From the table above, calculate the inflation rate from 2015 to 2016 (5 points) Use the table above to answer:  If you were earning $40,000/year in 2012, how much would you need to be earning in 2019 to have the same purchasing power?. (5 points) Use the table above to answer:  If average college tuition was $10,000 per...
2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Sales $ 699,332 $ 466,221 $ 368,554 $ 252,434 $ 189,800...
2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Sales $ 699,332 $ 466,221 $ 368,554 $ 252,434 $ 189,800 Cost of goods sold 352,166 234,761 187,327 128,167 94,900 Accounts receivable 33,918 27,227 25,283 14,767 13,001 Compute trend percents for the above accounts, using 2013 as the base year. Trend Percent for Net Sales: Choose Numerator: / Choose Denominator: / = Sales 2017: / = % 2016: / = % 2015: / = % 2014: / = % Trend Percent for Cost of Goods...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT