Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Individual Bettendorf Experience (X1) Education (X2) Sex (X3) 1 53600 5.5 4 F 2 52500 9...

Individual Bettendorf Experience (X1) Education (X2) Sex (X3)
1 53600 5.5 4 F
2 52500 9 4 M
3 58900 4 5 F
4 59000 8 4 M
5 57500 9.5 5 M
6 55500 3 4 F
7 56000 7 3 F
8 52700 1.5 4.5 F
9 65000 8.5 5 M
10 60000 7.5 6 F
11 56000 9.5 2 M
12 54900 6 2 F
13 55000 2.5 4 M
14 60500 1.5 4.5 M

1. At the 5% level of significance, is there a relationship in the population between the three predictors taken as a group and the annual salary for teachers?

Select one:

a. Yes

b.Cannot be determined from the data

c.No

d.50/50 chance that there is.

Which predictor(s), if any, would you remove because it does not contribute to the regression models, using the 90% confidence level, α = .10?

Select one:

a.Sex and Experience

b. None

c. Education

d. Experience

Solutions

Expert Solution

Using Excel, input data in the following manner:

Bettendorf Experience (X1) Education (X2) Sex (X3)
53600 5.5 4 1
52500 9 4 0
58900 4 5 1
59000 8 4 0
57500 9.5 5 0
55500 3 4 1
56000 7 3 1
52700 1.5 4.5 1
65000 8.5 5 0
60000 7.5 6 1
56000 9.5 2 0
54900 6 2 1
55000 2.5 4 0
60500 1.5 4.5 0

Go to Data, select Data Analysis, choose Regression. Put Experience, Education and Sex in X input range and Bettendorf in Y input range.

SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.569
R Square 0.323
Adjusted R Square 0.120
Standard Error 3249.019
Observations 14
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 3 50450913.071 16816971.024 1.593 0.252
Residual 10 105561229.786 10556122.979
Total 13 156012142.857
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value
Intercept 50546.956 4427.058 11.418 0.000
Experience (X1) 195.327 329.659 0.593 0.567
Education (X2) 1480.630 808.958 1.830 0.097
Sex (X3) -1595.060 1857.615 -0.859 0.411

1. H0: β1 = β2 = β3 = 0, There is no relationship in the population between the three predictors taken as a group and the annual salary for teachers

H1: At least one βi is not 0, There is a relationship in the population between the three predictors taken as a group and the annual salary for teachers

p-value (Significance F) = 0.252

Level of significance = 0.05

Since p-value is more than 0.05, we do not reject the null hypothesis.

So, there is no relationship in the population between the three predictors taken as a group and the annual salary for teachers. (Option C)

2. Since p-values for Education (0.097) is less than 0.1, and p-values for other two variables is more than 0.1, we can say that only Education is a significant variable. So, we can remove experience and sex (Option A)


Related Solutions

Individual Bettendorf Experience (X1) Education (X2) Sex (X3) 1 53600 5.5 4 F 2 52500 9...
Individual Bettendorf Experience (X1) Education (X2) Sex (X3) 1 53600 5.5 4 F 2 52500 9 4 M 3 58900 4 5 F 4 59000 8 4 M 5 57500 9.5 5 M 6 55500 3 4 F 7 56000 7 3 F 8 52700 1.5 4.5 F 9 65000 8.5 5 M 10 60000 7.5 6 F 11 56000 9.5 2 M 12 54900 6 2 F 13 55000 2.5 4 M 14 60500 1.5 4.5 M 1. What...
Individual Bettendorf Salary Experience (X1) Education (X2) Sex (X3) 1 53600 5.5 4.0 F 2 52500...
Individual Bettendorf Salary Experience (X1) Education (X2) Sex (X3) 1 53600 5.5 4.0 F 2 52500 9.0 4.0 M 3 58900 4.0 5.0 F 4 59000 8.0 4.0 M 5 57500 9.5 5.0 M 6 55500 3.0 4.0 F 7 56000 7.0 3.0 F 8 52700 1.5 4.5 F 9 65000 8.5 5.0 M 10 60000 7.5 6.0 F 11 56000 9.5 2.0 M 12 54900 6.0 2.0 F 13 55000 2.5 4.0 M 14 60500 1.5 4.5 M What...
Let X1, X2, X3 be continuous random variables with joint pdf f(X1, X2, X3)= 2 if...
Let X1, X2, X3 be continuous random variables with joint pdf f(X1, X2, X3)= 2 if 1<X1<2 -1<X2<0 -X2-1<X3<0                         0 otherwise Find Cov(X2, X3)
(1) z=ln(x^2+y^2), y=e^x. find ∂z/∂x and dz/dx. (2) f(x1, x2, x3) = x1^2*x2+3sqrt(x3), x1 = sqrt(x3),...
(1) z=ln(x^2+y^2), y=e^x. find ∂z/∂x and dz/dx. (2) f(x1, x2, x3) = x1^2*x2+3sqrt(x3), x1 = sqrt(x3), x2 = lnx3. find ∂f/∂x3, and df/dx3.
DATA 2 ID X1 X2 X3 Y A 0 2 4 9 B 1 0 8...
DATA 2 ID X1 X2 X3 Y A 0 2 4 9 B 1 0 8 10 C 0 1 0 5 D 1 1 0 1 E 0 0 8 10 CORRELATION MATRIX Y X1 X2 X3 Y 1 ? -0.304 +0.889 X1 ? 1 -0.327 0 X2 -0.304 -0.327 1 -0.598 X3 +0.889 0 -0.598 1 1. What is the sum of squares regression for the full model? (Correct answer is 58, please show me how to get...
DATA 2 ID X1 X2 X3 Y A 0 2 4 9 B 1 0 8...
DATA 2 ID X1 X2 X3 Y A 0 2 4 9 B 1 0 8 10 C 0 1 0 5 D 1 1 0 1 E 0 0 8 10 CORRELATION MATRIX Y X1 X2 X3 Y 1 ? -0.304 +0.889 X1 ? 1 -0.327 0 X2 -0.304 -0.327 1 -0.598 X3 +0.889 0 -0.598 1 Comparing the zero order model and full model 1. Did the addition of X2 and X3 significantly increase R2? (correct answer is...
Let X1, X2, X3 be independent having N(0,1). Let Y1=(X1-X2)/√2, Y2=(X1+X2-2*X3)/√6, Y3=(X1+X2+X3)/√3. Find the joint pdf...
Let X1, X2, X3 be independent having N(0,1). Let Y1=(X1-X2)/√2, Y2=(X1+X2-2*X3)/√6, Y3=(X1+X2+X3)/√3. Find the joint pdf of Y1, Y2, Y3, and the marginal pdfs.
4.Maximize: Z = 2X1+ X2-3X3 Subject to: 2X1+ X2= 14 X1+ X2+ X3≥6 X1, X2, X3≥0...
4.Maximize: Z = 2X1+ X2-3X3 Subject to: 2X1+ X2= 14 X1+ X2+ X3≥6 X1, X2, X3≥0 Solve the problem by using the M-technique.
3. Given is the function f : Df → R with F(x1, x2, x3) = x...
3. Given is the function f : Df → R with F(x1, x2, x3) = x 2 1 + 2x 2 2 + x 3 3 + x1 x3 − x2 + x2 √ x3 . (a) Determine the gradient of function F at the point x 0 = (x 0 1 , x0 2 , x0 3 ) = (8, 2, 4). (b) Determine the directional derivative of function F at the point x 0 in the direction given...
Consider the problem   maximize   Z = 5 x1 + 3 x2 + 2 x3 + 4...
Consider the problem   maximize   Z = 5 x1 + 3 x2 + 2 x3 + 4 x4        subject to                       5 x1 + x2 + x3 + 8 x4 = 10                       2 x1 + 4 x2 + 3 x3 + 2 x4 = 10                                     X j > 0, j=1,2,3,4 (a) Make the necessary row reductions to have the tableau ready for iteration 0. On this tableau identify the corresponding initial (artificial) basic feasible solution. Also, identify the initial entering and...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT