Question

In: Finance

1.[MM I: No corporate Taxes and No bankruptcy cost] i. Sunny Korea Corp. has a debt-equity...

1.[MM I: No corporate Taxes and No bankruptcy cost] i. Sunny Korea Corp. has a debt-equity ratio of 1. Its WACC is 8% and its cost of debt (RD) is 5%. Ignoring tax, what is its cost of equity (RE)?


ii. It’s considering restructuring of a debt-equity ratio of 1.5. Calculate the WACC again.


iii. In ii, you should get a higher cost of equity, but the same WACC. Why is that?

2. In the problem 1, now consider corporate taxes of 21%.

i. What is the cost of equity (RE) when a D/E is 1? Compare with the problem 1-i. (Remind that the WACC in MM II case I is constant and the same with the unlevered cost of capital.)

ii. What is the WACC when a D/E is 1? Compare with the WACC in problem 1-i (WACC=8%).

iii. What is the cost of equity (RE) when a D/E is now 1.5? Compare with the problem 2-i.

iv. What is the WACC when a D/E is 1.5? Compare with the WACC in problem 1-ii.

Solutions

Expert Solution

MM 1(i);-

Debt weight(DW) = 1, Equity weight(EW) = 1, Total weight(TW) = 2

WACC = RD*DW/TW + RE*EW/TW

0.08 = 0.05*1/2 + RE*1/2 ; solving the equation we get RE = 11%

MM 1(ii);-

Debt weight(DW) = 1.5, Equity weight(EW) = 1, Total weight(TW) = 2.5 RD=5%, RE=11%(refer MM1i)

WACC = RD*DW/TW + RE*EW/TW

= 0.05*1.5/2.5 + 0.11*1/2.5

= 7.4%

MM 1(iii);-

WACC get reduced from MM 1(i) to MM 1(ii), because the debt financing is more than equity financing. Cost of debt is lower than cost of equity so that WACC get reduced to 7.4%

MM 2(i);-

Debt weight(DW) = 1, Equity weight(EW) = 1, Total weight(TW) = 2, RD (after tax) = 5%*(1-0.21) = 3.95%, WACC = 8%

WACC = RD (after tax)*DW/TW + RE*EW/TW

0.08 = 0.0395*1/2 + RE*1/2 : RE = 12.05%

MM 2(ii);-

Debt weight(DW) = 1, Equity weight(EW) = 1, Total weight(TW) = 2, RD (after tax) = 5%*(1-0.21) = 3.95%, RE=11%(refer MM1i)

WACC = RD(after tax)*DW/TW + RE*EW/TW

= 0.0395*1/2 + 0.11*1/2

= 7.475%

Comparing with MM 1(i), WACC 8% reduced to 7.475% with same debt-equity ratio but it resulted due to tax saving from debt component.

MM 2(iii);-

Debt weight(DW) = 1.5, Equity weight(EW) = 1, Total weight(TW) = 2.5, RD (after tax) = 5%*(1-0.21) = 3.95%, WACC=8%

WACC = RD(after tax)*DW/TW + RE*EW/TW

0.08 = 0.0395*1.5/2.5 + RE*1/2.5

RE = 14.075%

Comparing with MM 2(i), RE increased because debt propostion is increased.

MM 2(iv);-

Debt weight(DW) = 1.5, Equity weight(EW) = 1, Total weight(TW) = 2.5, RD (after tax) = 5%*(1-0.21) = 3.95%, RE=11%

WACC = RD(after tax)*DW/TW + RE*EW/TW

= 3.95%*1.5/2.5 + 11%*1/2.5

WACC = 6.77%

From WACC 7.4% reduced to 6.77% due to tax effect.


Related Solutions

Bankruptcy Cost - (A) Suppose interest on debt was not paid prior to corporate taxes, so...
Bankruptcy Cost - (A) Suppose interest on debt was not paid prior to corporate taxes, so debt was not tax-advantaged, but interest still had to be paid or else the borrower was in default. Many fewer companies would risk issuing compare debt in this case. How would this negatively impact investors? (B) In their early years, many dot.com companies have earnings (EBIT) that fluctuate dramatically, sometimes positive and sometimes negative. Those companies almost never use debt financing during those early...
“Modigliani and Miller (MM) suggested that in a perfect world with no taxes or bankruptcy cost,...
“Modigliani and Miller (MM) suggested that in a perfect world with no taxes or bankruptcy cost, the dividend policy is irrelevant. They proposed that the dividend policy of a company has no effect on the stock price of a company or the company’s capital structure.” (Ani 2016) Based on the above statement you are required write an essay on dividend irrelevance and capital structure theories that has been originally advanced by Franco Modigliani and Merton H. Miller (Modigliani and Miller...
a)In corporate spheres, the existence of corporate taxes has led to the risk of bankruptcy. Using...
a)In corporate spheres, the existence of corporate taxes has led to the risk of bankruptcy. Using appropriate theories validate this assertion. b) Mergers and acquisitions are evaluated beforehand to determine the net economic advantage they create and this forms a basis for a decision on whether to approve or disapprove any such business combination. However, there are several overriding factors that corporate leaders, investment bankers and other stakeholders must consider beyond the mere synergies that accompany mergers and acquisitions. Evaluate...
In corporate spheres, the existence of corporate taxes has led to the risk of bankruptcy. Using...
In corporate spheres, the existence of corporate taxes has led to the risk of bankruptcy. Using appropriate theories validate this assertion
MOOOHOOO Corp (MH) has debt to equity ratio of 1 and an equity beta of 1.90....
MOOOHOOO Corp (MH) has debt to equity ratio of 1 and an equity beta of 1.90. Currently MH’s debt cost of capital is 5.5%. If MH is considering a change: by issuing debt to buyback stock to have a debt-equity ratio of 2 that it will maintain this ratio forever. With this change assume MH’s cost of debt capital will be 6% and their tax rate is 35%. If the expected market return is 9% and the risk free rate...
MM argue that in a world with no taxes and bankruptcy costs, capital structure does not...
MM argue that in a world with no taxes and bankruptcy costs, capital structure does not matter. Why is this the case? How will their argument change in the real world? Discuss. Please illustrate your answer with the appropriate graph
Safeassign Corp. has a debt to equity ratio of .85. Its Weighted average cost of capital...
Safeassign Corp. has a debt to equity ratio of .85. Its Weighted average cost of capital is 9.9% and the tax rate is 35%. If Safeassign’s after-tax cost of debt is 6.8%, what is the cost of equity? ii. Safeassign Corp. has a debt to equity ratio of .85. Its Weighted average cost of capital is 9.9% and the tax rate is 35%. If Safeassign’s cost of equity is 14% what is the pre-tax cost of debt? iii. Safegaurd Inc....
Which of these statements apply MM Proposition II without taxes? I. The expected return on equity...
Which of these statements apply MM Proposition II without taxes? I. The expected return on equity is positively related to leverage. II. The value of a firm cannot be changed by changing its capital structure. III. Risk to equity holders increases with leverage. IV. The expected return on equity is affected by the firm's debt-to-equity ratio. A. I, II, and III only B. II and IV only C. I, II, III, and IV D. I, III, and IV only Tiger...
MM Proposition I with corporate taxes states that: capital structure can affect firm value. by raising...
MM Proposition I with corporate taxes states that: capital structure can affect firm value. by raising the debt-to-equity ratio, the firm can lower its taxes and thereby increase its total value. firm value is maximized at an all-equity capital structure. all of the above. both A and B.
You are considering a firm under three separate scenarios: 1) no debt, taxes or bankruptcy costs,...
You are considering a firm under three separate scenarios: 1) no debt, taxes or bankruptcy costs, 2) with debt and taxes but no bankruptcy costs, and 3) with debt, taxes, and bankruptcy costs. Under which one of these three scenarios will the firm have the highest value? Please explain why. (7 points)
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT