Question

In: Accounting

MM argue that in a world with no taxes and bankruptcy costs, capital structure does not...

MM argue that in a world with no taxes and bankruptcy costs, capital structure does not matter. Why is this the case? How will their argument change in the real world? Discuss. Please illustrate your answer with the appropriate graph

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer-:

The Modigliani and Miller approach to capital theory, devised in the 1950s, advocates the capital structure irrelevancy theory. This suggests that the valuation of a firm is irrelevant to the capital structure of a company. Whether a firm is highly leveraged or has a lower debt component has no bearing on its market value. Rather, the market value of a firm is solely dependent on the operating profits of the company.

The capital structure of a company is the way a company finances its assets. A company can finance its operations by either equity or different combinations of debt and equity. The capital structure of a company can have a majority of the debt component or a majority of equity, or an even mix of both debt and equity. Each approach has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. There are various capital structure theories that attempt to establish a relationship between the financial leverage of a company (the proportion of debt in the company’s capital structure) with its market value. One such approach is the Modigliani and Miller Approach.

The Modigliani and Miller Approach assumes that there are no taxes, but in the real world, this is far from the truth. Most countries, if not all, tax companies. This theory recognizes the tax benefits accrued by interest payments. The interest paid on borrowed funds is tax deductible. However, the same is not the case with dividends paid on equity. In other words, the actual cost of debt is less than the nominal cost of debt due to tax benefits. The trade-off theory advocates that a company can capitalize its requirements with debts as long as the cost of distress, i.e., the cost of bankruptcy, exceeds the value of the tax benefits. Thus, the increased debts, until a given threshold value, will add value to a company.

The basic theorem states that in the absence of taxes, bankruptcy costs, agency costs, and asymmetric information, and in an efficient market, the value of a firm is unaffected by how that firm is financed. Since the value of the firm depends neither on its dividend policy nor its decision to raise capital by issuing stock or selling debt, the Modigliani–Miller theorem is often called the capital structure irrelevance principle.

Please give a thumbs up. Thankyou...


Related Solutions

“Modigliani and Miller (MM) suggested that in a perfect world with no taxes or bankruptcy cost,...
“Modigliani and Miller (MM) suggested that in a perfect world with no taxes or bankruptcy cost, the dividend policy is irrelevant. They proposed that the dividend policy of a company has no effect on the stock price of a company or the company’s capital structure.” (Ani 2016) Based on the above statement you are required write an essay on dividend irrelevance and capital structure theories that has been originally advanced by Franco Modigliani and Merton H. Miller (Modigliani and Miller...
In the miller modigliani theories of capital structure with tax but no bankruptcy costs, how would...
In the miller modigliani theories of capital structure with tax but no bankruptcy costs, how would the WACC and cost of equity (K_e) change if the firm increases leverage?
Based on the MM theory, explain how capital structure is influenced by taxes. Would the result...
Based on the MM theory, explain how capital structure is influenced by taxes. Would the result be different if considering bankruptcy costs? Illustrate.
How does the amount of the indirect bankruptcy costs influence the financial structure of a company?
How does the amount of the indirect bankruptcy costs influence the financial structure of a company?
MM Proposition I with corporate taxes states that: capital structure can affect firm value. by raising...
MM Proposition I with corporate taxes states that: capital structure can affect firm value. by raising the debt-to-equity ratio, the firm can lower its taxes and thereby increase its total value. firm value is maximized at an all-equity capital structure. all of the above. both A and B.
We are in an MM world with no taxes. The Casbah firm is an unlevered firm...
We are in an MM world with no taxes. The Casbah firm is an unlevered firm with a cost of equity capital of 10%. The firm is worth 10 million USD, and has two future states of the world in one years’ time. There is a 50% chance of the firm being worth 9 million USD and a 50% chance of the firm being worth 13 million USD. Anna would like to invest in a levered version of the Casbah...
(10) This is a world with NO TAXES (perfect capital markets). The firm is a no...
(10) This is a world with NO TAXES (perfect capital markets). The firm is a no growth firm and pays out all of its earnings as dividends. It is originally all equity financed (unlevered). The firm decides to issue $500,000 in debt to repurchase stock. The cost of debt is 4%. Fill in ALL the missing values in the table. Unlevered Levered EBIT 200,000 200,000 INTEREST Earnings (Net Income) #Shares 20,000 Ru 8% 8% RE EPS Price Value of the...
(Conceptual Question) Address the following questions pertaining to capital structure theories: What does the MM theory...
(Conceptual Question) Address the following questions pertaining to capital structure theories: What does the MM theory with no taxes (i.e., perfect capital markets) state about the value of a levered firm versus the value of an otherwise identical but unlevered firm? What does this imply about the optimal capital structure? Why does the MM theory with corporate taxes (otherwise markets are perfect) lead to 100% debt? According to the static trade-off theory, if a firm went from zero debt to...
Use MM theory to explain the effect of capital structure on the equity cost of capital...
Use MM theory to explain the effect of capital structure on the equity cost of capital and WACC a) in perfect markets; and b) when corporate tax exists. (No calculation is needed.)
1.[MM I: No corporate Taxes and No bankruptcy cost] i. Sunny Korea Corp. has a debt-equity...
1.[MM I: No corporate Taxes and No bankruptcy cost] i. Sunny Korea Corp. has a debt-equity ratio of 1. Its WACC is 8% and its cost of debt (RD) is 5%. Ignoring tax, what is its cost of equity (RE)? ii. It’s considering restructuring of a debt-equity ratio of 1.5. Calculate the WACC again. iii. In ii, you should get a higher cost of equity, but the same WACC. Why is that? 2. In the problem 1, now consider corporate...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT