In: Accounting
Two possible routes for a power line are under study. In both cases, the power line will last 15 years, have no salvage value, have annual property taxes of 2% of first cost, and have a yearly power loss of $500/km.
Around the lake | Under the lake | |
Length | 16 km | 6 km |
First cost | $8800/km | $24,000 /km |
Maintenance | $175/km/yr | $325 /km/yr |
If 9% interest is used, FIND
1. EUAC (Under) (round to nearest $100) |
2. EUAC (Around) (round to nearest $100) |
3. Which alternative do you recommend? (Under/Around) |
PLEASE USE EXCEL TO SOLVE AND PLS SHOW EXCEL FORMULAS
Workings
Formula | Description | Around the lake | Under the lake |
A | Length (in Km) | 16 | 6 |
B | First cost ($ per Km) | 8800 | 24000 |
C = A*B | Total First cost (in $) | 140800 | 144000 |
D | Maintenance cost each year /Km | 175 | 325 |
E = A*D | Total Maintenance cost each year | 2800 | 1950 |
F = C*2% | Annual property Taxes | 2816 | 2880 |
G = A*500 | Annual Power Loss | 8000 | 3000 |
H = E+F+G | Total Cost per annum | 13616 | 7830 |
I | Life in years | 15 | 15 |
J | Salvage Value in $ | 0 | 0 |
K | Interest Rate | 9% | 9% |
Answer to Question 1
Year | Cost | DF@9% | PV |
0 | 144000 | 1 | 144,000 |
1 | 7830 | 0.917431193 | 7,183 |
2 | 7830 | 0.841679993 | 6,590 |
3 | 7830 | 0.77218348 | 6,046 |
4 | 7830 | 0.708425211 | 5,547 |
5 | 7830 | 0.649931386 | 5,089 |
6 | 7830 | 0.596267327 | 4,669 |
7 | 7830 | 0.547034245 | 4,283 |
8 | 7830 | 0.50186628 | 3,930 |
9 | 7830 | 0.46042778 | 3,605 |
10 | 7830 | 0.422410807 | 3,307 |
11 | 7830 | 0.38753285 | 3,034 |
12 | 7830 | 0.355534725 | 2,784 |
13 | 7830 | 0.326178647 | 2,554 |
14 | 7830 | 0.299246465 | 2,343 |
15 | 7830 | 0.274538041 | 2,150 |
Total | 9.06068843 | 207,115 | |
Sum of DF yr 1 to 15 | 8.06068843 | ||
EUAC | =207115/8.0606 | 25,694 | |
25700 |
Answer to Question 2
Year | Cost | DF@9% | PV |
0 | 140800 | 1 | 140,800 |
1 | 13616 | 0.917431193 | 12,492 |
2 | 13616 | 0.841679993 | 11,460 |
3 | 13616 | 0.77218348 | 10,514 |
4 | 13616 | 0.708425211 | 9,646 |
5 | 13616 | 0.649931386 | 8,849 |
6 | 13616 | 0.596267327 | 8,119 |
7 | 13616 | 0.547034245 | 7,448 |
8 | 13616 | 0.50186628 | 6,833 |
9 | 13616 | 0.46042778 | 6,269 |
10 | 13616 | 0.422410807 | 5,752 |
11 | 13616 | 0.38753285 | 5,277 |
12 | 13616 | 0.355534725 | 4,841 |
13 | 13616 | 0.326178647 | 4,441 |
14 | 13616 | 0.299246465 | 4,075 |
15 | 13616 | 0.274538041 | 3,738 |
Total | 9.06068843 | 250,554 | |
Sum of DF yr 1 to 15 | 8.06068843 | ||
EUAC | =250554/8.0606 | 31,083 | |
31100 |
Answer to Question 3
Power line under the lake is recommended because of lower EUAC. The EUAC for power line construction under the lake is 25700 and the EUAC for power line construction around the lake is 31100 and hence power line under the lake will have a saving of $5400 per annum.