Question

Key Drivers/Benchmarking

Objective: Learn and apply key driver analysis to identify keys to success and determine firm’s performance relative to peers and high performers. Comparisons can be at the firm level (compare GM to Ford) and at the process level (compare phone service levels by Citibank vs Lands End)

Identify the 3-4 key success drivers for your industry.

Find benchmarking data source for each driver and, whenever, possible report the benchmark data. Note: Some benchmarking data must be purchased. Students are not expected to pay for the data. If data must be purchased, student should not purchase the data but should specify the source where the data can be purchased.

examples can be : Providence, AmeriFed 1993, BankOne Middle Market.

Submit a written analysis; approximately 2-3 single spaced pages. Bullet point and tabular formats encouraged.

Answer 1

/////////

In 2005 ,Procter and gamble purchased Gillette. This is specific purchases parked and internal growth which lead yet to be more innovative in the specific Market by introducing and merging itself into Procter and gamble.

Procter and gamble use the top talent included in the Gillette. It was hard to maintain employees into the organisation as a Gillette merged into Procter and gamble.

Procter and gamble handled the situation by hiding the top 10 and from June 18 to the organisation and also increasing that payments. By properly training the top employment from July, procter and gamble successfully developed a better marketing strategy by using these top talents and tackle the challenges by training the employees effectively according to the market. They found 100 login integration teams which specifically must both of the organisations into a single unit. They are also allowed to use their own processes in some specific countries such as China to increase the level of productivity while retaining the prophets.

Procter and gamble slowly merged all the applications from Gillette into the organisation which also increase the level of impact in processes which affected the change in the organisational structure of both of the companies. Procter and gamble successfully to and step to increase the communication and carefully crafted all the internal and external communication which reflect the merging rather than acquisition.

Procter and gamble successfully launched the cultural differentiation between both of the companies and improve the overall situation by merging the employee satisfaction as well. Smooth transition. Procter and gamble to shutdown gillette's offices and to integrate themselves into procter and gamble. They also integrated internal stakeholders in the decision making processes which made this specific merging lot easier for the delayed employees.

Procter and gamble also didn't remove ethical practices being practiced in each and every country and place regarding gene its culture. The adopted the culture from Gillette and implemented it into a positive way to Procter and gamble.