Question

In: Finance

1.A property can be purchased for $200,000 subject to an assumable loan at 8.25% (below market...

1.A property can be purchased for $200,000 subject to an assumable loan at 8.25% (below market reates) with 15 years remaining and a balance of only 120,000 (The original loan was for 165,000). You want to assume the mortgage, but need to finance $150,000 total so you must take out a second mortgage for $30,000 for 15 years at 8.75%. Alternatively, there is a comaprable property for $190,000 for which you can obtain a loan of $150,000 for 15 years at the market rate of 11.00%. What rate of "return" would a borrower earn by assuming the loan and taking out a second mortgage instead of borrowing at the market rate?

2. A property can be purchased for $150,000 subject to an assumable loan at 8.25% (below market rates) with 25 years remaining and a balance of $135,000. A comparable property without special financing costs $145,000 and a loan for $135,000 can be obtained at 8.5% for 25 years. What rate of "return" would a borrower earn by assuming the loan instead of borrowing at the market rate?

Solutions

Expert Solution

1.

Option 1
Assuming the loan and taking out second mortgage
Property value $200,000
Assumable loan value $120,000
Interest rate per annum 8.25%
Years remaining 15
Payment per month $1,164.17 =PMT(8.25%/12,15*12,-$120,000)
Second Mortgage
Loan value $30,000
Interest rate per annum 8.75%
Years remaining 15
Payment per month $299.83 =PMT(8.75%/12,15*12,-$30,000)
Total Payment per month $1,464.00 ($1,164.17+$299.83)
Option 2
Borrowing at market rate
Property value $190,000
Loan value $150,000
Interest rate per annum 11.00%
Years remaining 15
Payment per month $1,704.90 =PMT(11%/12,15*12,-$150,000)

Calculation of rate of return theborrower will earn by assuming the loan and taking out a second mortgage instead of borrowing at the market rate:

Monthly saving in payment in Option 1 instead of Option 2 $240.89 ($1,704.90-$1,464)
Additional cost of Property in Option 1 $10,000 ($200,000-$190,000)
Rate of return per month 2.4% =rate(15*12,-$240.89,$10,000)

2.

Option 1
Assuming the loan
Property value $150,000
Assumable loan value $135,000
Interest rate per annum 8.25%
Years remaining 25
Payment per month $1,064.41 =PMT(8.25%/12,25*12,-$135,000)
Option 2
Property without special financing costs
Property value $145,000
Loan value $135,000
Interest rate per annum 8.50%
Years remaining 25
Payment per month $1,087.06 =PMT(8.5%/12,25*12,-$135,000)

Rate of "return" would a borrower earn by assuming the loan instead of borrowing at the market rate:

Monthly saving in Option 1 instead of Option2 $22.65 ($1,087.06-$1,064.41)
Additional cost of Property in Option 1 $5,000 ($150,000-$145,000)
Rate of return per month 0.2% =rate(25*12,-22.65,$5,000)

Related Solutions

A mortgage loan of $200,000 has just been made on a property valued at $250,000. The...
A mortgage loan of $200,000 has just been made on a property valued at $250,000. The interest rate is 5% with 2 points with a 10 year balloon. Monthly amortization payments are based on a 30 year maturity. The mortgage also carries a 2% prepayment penalty. a. What is the indicated loan-to-value ratio? b. What is the monthly mortgage payment? c. How much interest is paid in the fourth year? d. What is the dollar amount of the balloon payment?...
A machine can be purchased today for $1 million. It will generate cash flows of $200,000...
A machine can be purchased today for $1 million. It will generate cash flows of $200,000 at the end of each year for 10 years. However, a $300,000 overhaul will be required at the end of year 5. At a 10% opportunity cost of money, compute the net present value of this investment.
Lori, who is single, purchased 5-year class property for $200,000 and 7-year class property for $410,000...
Lori, who is single, purchased 5-year class property for $200,000 and 7-year class property for $410,000 on May 20, 2017. Lori expects the taxable income derived from her business (without regard to the amount expensed under § 179) to be about $800,000. Lori wants to elect immediate § 179 expensing, but she doesn't know which asset she should expense under § 179. She does not claim any available additional first-year depreciation. Click here to access Exhibit 8.1 and the depreciation...
Lori, who is single, purchased 5-year class property for $200,000 and 7-year class property for $410,000...
Lori, who is single, purchased 5-year class property for $200,000 and 7-year class property for $410,000 on May 20, 2017. Lori expects the taxable income derived from her business (without regard to the amount expensed under § 179) to be about $800,000. Lori wants to elect immediate § 179 expensing, but she doesn't know which asset she should expense under § 179. She does not claim any available additional first-year depreciation. Click here to access Exhibit 8.1 and the depreciation...
Sarah purchased a condo for $200,000 with a $45,000 down payment and a $155,000 bank loan....
Sarah purchased a condo for $200,000 with a $45,000 down payment and a $155,000 bank loan. The mortgage is to be amortized in just 15 years with an interest rate of 3% per year, compounded monthly. 10 years later, the value of her condo has risen to $260,000 and she would like to sell her property. How much does she still owe on her mortgage? What is her equity in the condo at this point? Please show your work and...
15.      You have purchased a duplex property for $275,000. The property’s assessed value was $200,000,...
15.      You have purchased a duplex property for $275,000. The property’s assessed value was $200,000, of which $140,000 is for improvements and $60,000 is for land. The property was purchased on the first day of the tax year. What is the cost recovery for the year of acquisition? a. 4,000 b. 6,709 c. 5,156 d. 275,000 16.       Cost Recovery Deduction depends on the useful economic life of an asset defined by the IRS. The class life of residential real...
Company purchased a property that included both land and a building for $200,000.  Company hired an appraiser...
Company purchased a property that included both land and a building for $200,000.  Company hired an appraiser who determined that the market value of the land was $140,000 and the market value of the building was $50,000.  At what amount should Company record the building and land cost? (Lump Sum Purchase)
An old two-flat can be purchased for $200,000 cash. The two units can bring in a...
An old two-flat can be purchased for $200,000 cash. The two units can bring in a total of $2,500 per month (allowing for normal vacancies). The total operating expenses for property taxes, repairs, gardening, and so forth are estimated to be $200 per month. For tax purposes, straight-line depreciation over a 20-year remaining life with to a zero salvage value will be used. Of the total $200,000 cost of the property, $50,000 is the value of the land. Assume a...
An old two-flat can be purchased for $200,000 cash. The two units can bring in a...
An old two-flat can be purchased for $200,000 cash. The two units can bring in a total of $2,500 per month (allowing for normal vacancies). The total operating expenses for property taxes, repairs, gardening, and so forth are estimated to be $200 per month. For tax purposes, straight-line depreciation over a 20-year remaining life with to a zero salvage value will be used. Of the total $200,000 cost of the property, $50,000 is the value of the land. Assume a...
Suppose a property can be bought for $2,500,000 and it will provide $200,000/year net cash flow...
Suppose a property can be bought for $2,500,000 and it will provide $200,000/year net cash flow forever, and you can borrow a perpetual interest-only mortgage secured by that property at a 7% interest rate, up to an amount of $950,000. (a) Does this present “positive” or “negative leverage,” and (b) why? (c) Do you think that the use of leverage, in this case, will increase the NPV of the investment for the equity investor in the property? (d) Why or...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT