In: Finance
Suppose a property can be bought for $2,500,000 and it will provide $200,000/year net cash flow forever, and you can borrow a perpetual interest-only mortgage secured by that property at a 7% interest rate, up to an amount of $950,000. (a) Does this present “positive” or “negative leverage,” and (b) why? (c) Do you think that the use of leverage, in this case, will increase the NPV of the investment for the equity investor in the property? (d) Why or why not?
Answer to Question (a) this will be a positive leverage
Answer to Question b), Rate of return from property = cash inflow / cost of property |
|||
Rate = $200,000 / 2,500,000 | 0.0800 | ||
Rate of return = 8%, interest rate is 7%, so this is positive leverage | |||
The return from property is more than interest rate, so leverage will increase value | |||
So this is positive leverage |
Answer to Question (c),
The use of leverage, in this case, will increase the NPV of the investment for the equity investor in the property.
NPV = Present value of net cash inflow - equity investment | |||
present value of perpetual cashflow = annual cash flow / interest rate or cost of capital | |||
perpetual cash inflowflow | 200,000 | ||
Interest on Olan of 950,000 | 66,500 | ||
Net cash inflow | 133,500 | ||
Interest rate | 7% | ||
present value of net cash flow | 1,907,142.857 | ||
Cost of property | 2,500,000 | ||
Loan | 950,000 | ||
Equity Investment | 1,550,000 | ||
NPV | 357,142.8571 |
Answer to Question d),
The reason for increase NPV is the the interest is 7%, but return from the property is more than interest rate, so 1% after paying interest is constituting for increasing NPV.
Please rate the answer maximum if you get the answer and satisfied. If you remains any doubts on this answer, please leave a comment and it will be cleared.
Thank you,…