Question

In: Statistics and Probability

A “social experiment” conducted by a TV program questioned what people do when they see a...

A “social experiment” conducted by a TV program questioned what people do

when they see a very obviously bruised woman getting picked on by her

boyfriend. On two different occasions at the same restaurant, the same

couple was depicted. In one scenario, the woman was dressed

“provocatively,” and in the other scenario, the woman was dressed

“conservatively”. The table below shows how many restaurant diners were

present under each scenario, and whether or not they intervened.

Scenario

Provocative Conservative Total

Intervene Yes 5 15 20

No 15 10 25

Total 20 25    45

1. What are the claims being tested?

2. What are the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses?

3. What is the population of interest?

4. What is the sample?

5. Is this generalizable?

6. Does this study have the potential to demonstrate causation?

Solutions

Expert Solution


Related Solutions

Some students do homework with the tv on. some researchers want to see if people can...
Some students do homework with the tv on. some researchers want to see if people can work as effectively with as without distraction. the researchers will time some volunteers to see how long it takes them to complete some relatively easy crossword puzzles with and without tv on. a) design an experiment that will require a two sample independent test b) design experiment that will require dependent test
An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of...
An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of a toxin. The antidote was given to a different sample of participants five minutes after the toxin. Thirty minutes later the response was measured as the concentration in the blood. What can the researchers conclude with an α of 0.01? Dose Antidote 5 10 15 1 0.6 6.5 1.1 2.1 1.5 2.4 3.1 4.1 5.9 2 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.7 1.3 1.5 2.1 3.1...
An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of...
An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of a toxin. The antidote was given to a different sample of participants five minutes after the toxin. Thirty minutes later the response was measured as the concentration in the blood. What can the researchers conclude with an α of 0.05? Dose Antidote 5 10 15 1 0.6 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.5 2.4 3.1 4.1 5.9 2 1.1 2.5 1.1 1.7 1.3 1.5 2.1 3.1...
An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of...
An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of a toxin. The antidote was given to a different sample of participants five minutes after the toxin. Twenty-five minutes later the response was measured as the concentration in the blood. What can the researchers conclude with an α of 0.05? Dose Antidote 5 10 15 1 0.6 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.5 2.4 3.1 4.1 5.9 2 1.6 1.2 1.1 1.7 1.3 1.5 2.1 3.1...
An experiment was conducted see the effect on fertilizer on production of Mameys. H0 : fertilizers...
An experiment was conducted see the effect on fertilizer on production of Mameys. H0 : fertilizers have no impact on mamey production. H1 : fertilizers have an impact on mamey production. There are four treatment (a=4); three types of fertilizer and the control. Each treatment has four replicates (n=4). The number of mameys produced is given in the table below. A. Using these data complete a 1-Way ANOVA table. F1: 1, 2, 6, 11 F2: 2, 4, 2, 4 F3:...
An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of...
An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of a toxin. The antidote was given to a different sample of participants five minutes after the toxin. Twenty-five minutes later the response was measured as the concentration in the blood. What can the researchers conclude with α = 0.01? Dose Antidote 5 10 15 1 0.6 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.5 6.2 3.1 4.1 5.9 2 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.7 1.3 1.5 2.1 3.1 2.1...
An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of...
An experiment was conducted to see the effectiveness of two antidotes to three different doses of a toxin. The antidote was given to a different sample of participants five minutes after the toxin. Twenty-five minutes later the response was measured as the concentration in the blood. What can the researchers conclude with α = 0.01? Dose Antidote 5 10 15 1 0.6 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.5 6.2 3.1 4.1 5.9 2 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.7 1.3 1.5 2.1 3.1 2.1...
A social psychologist conducted a study to see if sales approach made a difference in the...
A social psychologist conducted a study to see if sales approach made a difference in the number of raffle tickets sold. Using the norm of reciprocity (giving buyers a free gift), 3, 1, and 2 tickets were sold; using the foot-in-the-door approach (getting buyers to agree to buy one ticket first, then more), 3, 3, and 3 tickets were sold; and using no special technique, 1, 0, 1, and 2 tickets were sold. Using the .05 level, does sales technique...
What does social loafing, social facilitation and deindividuation have to do with the Stanley Milgrim experiment?...
What does social loafing, social facilitation and deindividuation have to do with the Stanley Milgrim experiment? Define the concepts, then relate them to the experiment.
What are the most important ethical concerns that arise when research is conducted with people in...
What are the most important ethical concerns that arise when research is conducted with people in low- and middle-income countries?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT