In: Accounting
How does a company transform its breakeven or loss customers into profitable ones while using activity-based (menu-based) pricing? Provide a specific example!
solution
Activity Based Pricing / Activity Based Costing is an Modern method of allocating overheads to the products and deciding the pricing of the product . it gives importance to non volume measure for allocating overhead cost which is ignored in traditional methods like absorption costing
there are 4 important steps in activity based princing / activity based costing for assigning the overheads costs to products
1) Identify all the activities which are performed for manufacturing the products or for rendering the services
2) identify Cost for each activity (Identified in steps 1) (It is term as cost Pool)
3) Find Out a determinent (Cost Driver) based on which we can assign activity cost to the produsts/services
4) Assign Cost of activity based on the Demand of Activity by the Product manufacturing
In Traditional method Overheads are assigned based on some Volume e.g Machine Hours , Labours Hours , Unit Produced it ignores the other more important factors which are non valume factors viz Number of set up Required by the products, Number of Purchase Order to be made etc
in the following example we try to solve same example with traditional method and activity based pricing method and we cover as how loss is converted into profit in activity based pricing method
Example
ABC LTD PRODUCE 2 PRODUCTS L & H
Annual manufacturing details are as followed
Product | output | machine hours | labou hours | No of purchase order | No of set ups | Contribution per unit |
L | 1000 | 2000 | 4000 | 80 | 40 | 160 |
H | 10000 | 20000 | 40000 | 160 | 60 | 35 |
TOTAL | 11000 | 22000 | 44000 | 240 | 100 |
Total cost center cost is 440000 ( futher analysed below)
particulars | Amount |
Volume - related | 110000 |
Purchase -related | 120000 |
Set-up related | 210000 |
Total | 440000 |
a) Contribution from Each Product (Sales revenue less variable cost)
Product L = Contribution per unit * No of Units Produced
= 80 *1000 =160000
Product h = Contribution per unit * No of Units Produced
= 35 *10000 = 350000
b) Traditional Method of assigning overhead Cost & Computation of profit & loss
Absorption of overheads Based on Machine Hours
Absorption rate = overheads cost/ total machine hours
= 440000/22000
= 20/machine hour
Overheads Assigned to Product L = Machine Hours * Absorption Rate
= 2000*20
=40000
Overheads Assigned to Product h = Machine Hours * Absorption Rate
= 20000*20
=400000
Computation of Profit / Loss
Product L | Product H | Total | |
Contribution | 160000 | 350000 | 510000 |
Less: Overheads Cost | 40000 | 400000 | 440000 |
Profit/Loss | 120000 | -50000 | 70000 |
Note
Product L = Contribution - Overheads
=160000-40000
=120000(profit)
Product H = Contribution - Overheads
=350000-400000
=50000(loss)
c) Activity Based Pricing / Acitivity Based Costing
Computation of cost driver rate
particulars | cost drivers | drivers volumes | cost pool | cost driver rate |
Volume - related | Unit Produced | 11000 | 110000 | 10/ output |
Purchase -related | Purchased order | 240 | 120000 | 500/purchase order |
Set-up related | no of set ups | 100 | 210000 | 2100/per set up |
Assignment of Overhead cost
particulars | working product L | Product L | working product H | Product H |
Volume - related | 1000*10 | 10000 | 10000*10 | 10000 |
Purchase -related | 80*500 | 40000 | 160*500 | 80000 |
Set-up related | 40*2100 | 84000 | 60*2100 | 126000 |
Total | 134000 | 306000 |
Computation of Profit / Loss
Product L | Product H | Total | |
Contribution | 160000 | 350000 | 510000 |
Less: Overheads Cost | 134000 | 306000 | 440000 |
Profit/Loss | 26000 | 44000 | 70000 |
Product L = Contribution - Overheads
=160000-134000
=26000(profit)
Product H = Contribution - Overheads
=350000-306000
=44000(profit)
Note
Overall profit of ABC ltd remains same i.e 70000
But Profit from individual product changes due to change of cost allocating method where we saw that how loss Showing product H is converted into Profit showing Product because of change in method adopted in overhead allocation