In: Statistics and Probability
Two marathon training procedures are tried for comparison
purposes. Their efficacy is to be determined in a marathon race.
Assume race times are given in minutes. Use α=0.056α=0.056 for all
calculations.
The following results were observed:. The data is given in the file
below.
Procedure_A | Procedure_B | |
1 | 146 | 144 |
2 | 147 | 147 |
3 | 149 | 150 |
4 | 142 | 147 |
5 | 144 | 141 |
6 | 147 | 147 |
7 | 143 | 147 |
8 | 148 | 148 |
9 | 147 | 148 |
10 | 146 | 151 |
11 | 147 | 145 |
12 | 144 | 141 |
13 | 144 | 153 |
14 | 147 | 150 |
15 | 140 | 141 |
16 | 151 | |
17 | 144 | |
18 | 156 | |
19 | 150 | |
20 | 153 | |
21 | 155 | |
22 | 140 | |
23 | 138 | |
24 | 146 | |
25 | 141 | |
26 | 151 |
(a) Do the populations appear to be normal? Hint: use a
probability plot to decide
A. Yes, procedure B appears to be normal but
procedure A does not appear to be normal
B. Yes, Both procedure A and procedure B appear to
be normal
C. Yes, procedure A appears to be normal but
procedure B does not appear to be normal
D. No, Both procedure A and procedure B appear to
be normal
E. No, neither procedure A appears to be normal
nor procedure B appears to be normal
F. Yes, Both procedure A and procedure B appear to
be non-normal
(b) Choose the most appropriate statistical hypotheses to see which
procedure results in longer marathon times (be very careful in how
you formulate your hypothesis, this one is tricky! Use the sample
data to make any assumptions necessary.)
A. H0:μ1=μ2HA:μ1>μ2H0:μ1=μ2HA:μ1>μ2
B. H0:μ1=μ2HA:μ1<μ2H0:μ1=μ2HA:μ1<μ2
C. H0:μD=0,HA:μD<0H0:μD=0,HA:μD<0
D. H0:μ1=μ2HA:μ1≠μ2H0:μ1=μ2HA:μ1≠μ2
E. H0:μD=0,HA:μD≠0H0:μD=0,HA:μD≠0
F. H0:μD=0,HA:μD>0H0:μD=0,HA:μD>0
(c) Using technology available to you, test to see if the variances
are equal or not?
A. There appears to be more variation in the 2nd
procedure then in the 1st.
B. They appear to be equal.
C. There appears to be an unequal amount of
variation in the 2nd procedure then in the 1st.
D. There appears to be more variation in the 1st
procedure then in the 2nd.
(d) Report the p-value of the test you ran in (c) use at least
three decimals in your answer (this is from Levene's test).
P-value =
(e) Test the statistical hypotheses in (b) by carrying out the
appropriate statistical test. Find the value of the test statistic
for this test, use at least two decimals in your answer (from your
test of middle).
Test Statistic =
(f) Determine the PP-value for this test, to at least three decimal
places (from your test of middle).
P=
(g) Based on the above calculations, we should reject or not
reject the null hypothesis.
Ans a ) using minitab>graph> boxplot
we have
A. Yes, procedure B appears to be normal but procedure A does not appear to be normal
b ) D. H0:μ1=μ2HA:μ1≠μ2
c ) using minitab>stat>basic stat>2 variance
we have
Test and CI for Two Variances: Procedure_A, Procedure_B
Method
Null hypothesis σ(Procedure_A) / σ(Procedure_B) = 1
Alternative hypothesis σ(Procedure_A) / σ(Procedure_B) ≠ 1
Significance level α = 0.05
Statistics
95% CI for
Variable N StDev Variance StDevs
Procedure_A 15 2.473 6.114 (1.700, 4.138)
Procedure_B 26 4.861 23.626 (3.988, 6.407)
Ratio of standard deviations = 0.509
Ratio of variances = 0.259
95% Confidence Intervals
CI for
CI for StDev Variance
Method Ratio Ratio
Bonett (0.307, 0.802) (0.094, 0.644)
Levene (0.301, 0.863) (0.091, 0.746)
Tests
Test
Method DF1 DF2 Statistic P-Value
Bonett — — — 0.006
Levene 1 39 6.05 0.018
c ) option D is true
D. There appears to be more variation in the 1st procedure then in the 2nd.
d ) P-value = 0.018
e ) using minitab>stat>basic stat>2 sample t
we have
Two-Sample T-Test and CI: Procedure_A, Procedure_B
Two-sample T for Procedure_A vs Procedure_B
N Mean StDev SE Mean
Procedure_A 15 145.40 2.47 0.64
Procedure_B 26 147.12 4.86 0.95
Difference = μ (Procedure_A) - μ (Procedure_B)
Estimate for difference: -1.72
95% CI for difference: (-4.04, 0.61)
T-Test of difference = 0 (vs ≠): T-Value = -1.50 P-Value = 0.143 DF
= 38
test statistic = -1.50
f )p value is 0.143
g 0 since p >0.056 , we should not reject the null hypothesis.