In: Statistics and Probability
For a sample of 20 New England cities, a sociologist studies the crime rate in each city (crimes per 100,000 residents) as a function of its poverty rate (in %) and its median income (in $1,000s). A portion of the regression results is as follows. [You may find it useful to reference the t table.]
ANOVA | df | SS | MS | F | Significance F |
Regression | 2 | 14,616.0 | 7,308.0 | 1.50 | 0.252 |
Residual | 17 | 83,082.77 | 4,887.22 | ||
Total | 19 | 97,698.8 | |||
Coefficients | Standard Error |
t Stat | p-value | |
Intercept | 895.5077 | 87.3533 | 10.252 | 0.000 |
Poverty | −8.9628 | 5.6537 | −1.5850 | 0.131 |
Income | 1.0354 | 14.6046 | 0.0710 | 0.944 |
b-1. Choose the appropriate hypotheses to test whether the poverty rate and the crime rate are linearly related.
H0: β1 = 0; HA: β1 ≠ 0
H0: β1 ≤ 0; HA: β1 > 0
H0: β1 ≥ 0; HA: β1 < 0
b-2. At the 5% significance level, what is the conclusion to the test?
c-1. Construct a 95% confidence interval for the slope coefficient of income. (Negative values should be indicated by a minus sign. Round "tα/2,df" value to 3 decimal places, and final answers to 2 decimal places.)
c-2. Using the confidence interval, determine whether income influences the crime rate at the 5% significance level.
Income is significant in explaining the crime rate, since its slope coefficient does not significantly differ from zero.
Income is not significant in explaining the crime rate, since its slope coefficient significantly differs from zero.
Income is significant in explaining the crime rate, since its slope coefficient significantly differs from zero.
Income is not significant in explaining the crime rate, since its slope coefficient does not significantly differ from zero.
d-1. Choose the appropriate hypotheses to determine whether the poverty rate and income are jointly significant in explaining the crime rate.
H0: β1 = β2 = 0; HA: At least one β j > 0
H0: β1 = β2 = 0; HA: At least one β j < 0
H0: β1 = β2 = 0; HA: At least one β j ≠ 0
d-2. At the 5% significance level, are the poverty rate and income jointly significant in explaining the crime rate?
No, since the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Yes, since the null hypothesis is rejected.
No, since the null hypothesis is rejected.
Yes, since the null hypothesis is not rejected.
b-1)
H0: β1 = 0; HA: β1 ≠ 0
since p value >0.05
Do not reject H0 we cannot conclude that the poverty rate and the crime rate are linearly related.
c-1)
estimated slope b= | 1.0354 | |||
standard error of slope=sb== | 14.6046 | |||
for 95 % confidence and 17degree of freedom critical t= | 2.1100 | |||
95% confidence interval =b1 -/+ t*standard error= | (-29.78 ,31.85) |
c-2)
Income is not significant in explaining the crime rate, since its slope coefficient does not significantly differ from zero.
d-1)H0: β1 = β2 = 0; HA: At least one β j ≠ 0
d-2)
No, since the null hypothesis is not rejected.