Question

In: Statistics and Probability

For a sample of 20 New England cities, a sociologist studies the crime rate in each...

For a sample of 20 New England cities, a sociologist studies the crime rate in each city (crimes per 100,000 residents) as a function of its poverty rate (in %) and its median income (in $1,000s). A portion of the regression results is as follows. [You may find it useful to reference the t table.]

ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 2 14,616.0 7,308.0 1.50 0.252
Residual 17 83,082.77 4,887.22
Total 19 97,698.8
Coefficients Standard
Error
t Stat p-value
Intercept 895.5077 87.3533 10.252 0.000
Poverty −8.9628 5.6537 −1.5850 0.131
Income 1.0354 14.6046 0.0710 0.944

b-1. Choose the appropriate hypotheses to test whether the poverty rate and the crime rate are linearly related.

  • H0: β1 = 0; HA: β1 ≠ 0

  • H0: β1 ≤ 0; HA: β1 > 0

  • H0: β1 ≥ 0; HA: β1 < 0

b-2. At the 5% significance level, what is the conclusion to the test?

  • Do not reject H0we cannot conclude that the poverty rate and the crime rate are linearly related.
  • Reject H0we can conclude that the poverty rate and the crime rate are linearly related.
  • Do not reject H0we can conclude that the poverty rate and the crime rate are linearly related.
  • Reject H0we cannot conclude that the poverty rate and the crime rate are linearly related.

c-1. Construct a 95% confidence interval for the slope coefficient of income. (Negative values should be indicated by a minus sign. Round "tα/2,df" value to 3 decimal places, and final answers to 2 decimal places.)

c-2. Using the confidence interval, determine whether income influences the crime rate at the 5% significance level.

  • Income is significant in explaining the crime rate, since its slope coefficient does not significantly differ from zero.

  • Income is not significant in explaining the crime rate, since its slope coefficient significantly differs from zero.

  • Income is significant in explaining the crime rate, since its slope coefficient significantly differs from zero.

  • Income is not significant in explaining the crime rate, since its slope coefficient does not significantly differ from zero.

d-1. Choose the appropriate hypotheses to determine whether the poverty rate and income are jointly significant in explaining the crime rate.

  • H0: β1 = β2 = 0; HA: At least one β j > 0

  • H0: β1 = β2 = 0; HA: At least one β j < 0

  • H0: β1 = β2 = 0; HA: At least one β j ≠ 0

d-2. At the 5% significance level, are the poverty rate and income jointly significant in explaining the crime rate?

  • No, since the null hypothesis is not rejected.

  • Yes, since the null hypothesis is rejected.

  • No, since the null hypothesis is rejected.

  • Yes, since the null hypothesis is not rejected.

Solutions

Expert Solution

b-1)

H0: β1 = 0; HA: β1 ≠ 0

since p value >0.05

Do not reject H0 we cannot conclude that the poverty rate and the crime rate are linearly related.

c-1)

estimated slope b= 1.0354
standard error of slope=sb== 14.6046
for 95 % confidence and 17degree of freedom critical t= 2.1100
95% confidence interval =b1 -/+ t*standard error= (-29.78 ,31.85)

c-2)

Income is not significant in explaining the crime rate, since its slope coefficient does not significantly differ from zero.

d-1)H0: β1 = β2 = 0; HA: At least one β j ≠ 0

d-2)

No, since the null hypothesis is not rejected.


Related Solutions

For a sample of 20 New England cities, a sociologist studies the crime rate in each...
For a sample of 20 New England cities, a sociologist studies the crime rate in each city (crimes per 100,000 residents) as a function of its poverty rate (in %) and its median income (in $1,000s). A portion of the regression results is as follows. [You may find it useful to reference the t table.] ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 2 2,517.3 1,258.7 0.29 0.749 Residual 17 72,837.53 4,284.56 Total 19 75,354.8 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime rates (per million population). x1: New England Crime Rate 3.3 3.9 4.2 4.1 3.3 4.1 1.8 4.8 2.9 3.1 Another random sample of n2 = 12 regions in the Rocky Mountain states gave the following violent crime rates (per million population). x2: Rocky Mountain Crime Rate 3.7 4.1 4.5 5.5 3.3 4.8 3.5 2.4 3.1 3.5 5.2 2.8 Assume that the crime rate distribution...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime rates (per million population). x1: New England Crime Rate 3.3 3.9 4.2 4.1 3.3 4.1 1.8 4.8 2.9 3.1 Another random sample of n2 = 12 regions in the Rocky Mountain states gave the following violent crime rates (per million population). x2: Rocky Mountain Crime Rate 3.9 4.1 4.5 5.3 3.3 4.8 3.5 2.4 3.1 3.5 5.2 2.8 Assume that the crime rate distribution...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime rates (per million population). x1: New England Crime Rate 3.3 3.7 4.2 3.9 3.3 4.1 1.8 4.8 2.9 3.1 Another random sample of n2 = 12 regions in the Rocky Mountain states gave the following violent crime rates (per million population). x2: Rocky Mountain Crime Rate 3.7 4.3 4.5 5.3 3.3 4.8 3.5 2.4 3.1 3.5 5.2 2.8 Assume that the crime rate distribution...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime rates (per million population) x1: New England Crime Rate 3.5 3.7 4.2 4.1 3.3 4.1 1.8 4.8 2.9 3.1 Another random sample of n2 = 12 regions in the Rocky Mountain states gave the following violent crime rates (per million population). x2: Rocky Mountain Crime Rate 3.9 4.3 4.5 5.1 3.3 4.8 3.5 2.4 3.1 3.5 5.2 2.8 Assume that the crime rate distribution...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime rates (per million population). x1: New England Crime Rate 3.5 3.7 4.0 4.1 3.3 4.1 1.8 4.8 2.9 3.1 Another random sample of n2 = 12 regions in the Rocky Mountain states gave the following violent crime rates (per million population). x2: Rocky Mountain Crime Rate 3.7 4.3 4.7 5.3 3.3 4.8 3.5 2.4 3.1 3.5 5.2 2.8 Assume that the crime rate distribution...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime rates (per million population). x1: New England Crime Rate 3.3 3.7 4.0 4.1 3.3 4.1 1.8 4.8 2.9 3.1 Another random sample of n2 = 12 regions in the Rocky Mountain states gave the following violent crime rates (per million population). x2: Rocky Mountain Crime Rate 3.7 4.3 4.7 5.3 3.3 4.8 3.5 2.4 3.1 3.5 5.2 2.8 Assume that the crime rate distribution...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime rates (per million population). x1: New England Crime Rate 3.4 3.6 4.0 4.1 3.3 4.1 1.8 4.8 2.9 3.1 Another random sample of n2 = 12 regions in the Rocky Mountain states gave the following violent crime rates (per million population). x2: Rocky Mountain Crime Rate 3.8 4.5 4.4 5.5 3.3 4.8 3.5 2.4 3.1 3.5 5.2 2.8 Assume that the crime rate distribution...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime rates (per million population). x1: New England Crime Rate 3.5 3.9 4.0 4.1 3.3 4.1 1.8 4.8 2.9 3.1 Another random sample of n2 = 12 regions in the Rocky Mountain states gave the following violent crime rates (per million population). x2: Rocky Mountain Crime Rate 3.7 4.3 4.5 5.3 3.3 4.8 3.5 2.4 3.1 3.5 5.2 2.8 x1 = 3.55 s1 = .83...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime...
A random sample of n1 = 10 regions in New England gave the following violent crime rates (per million population). x1: New England Crime Rate 3.5 3.7 4.2 3.9 3.3 4.1 1.8 4.8 2.9 3.1 Another random sample of n2 = 12 regions in the Rocky Mountain states gave the following violent crime rates (per million population). x2: Rocky Mountain Crime Rate 3.5 4.1 4.5 5.3 3.3 4.8 3.5 2.4 3.1 3.5 5.2 2.8 Assume that the crime rate distribution...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT