In: Operations Management
PLS DO NOT ATTEMPT THIS QUESTION IF YOU ARE NOT GOING TO COMPLETE IT.
"NO PLAGIARISM"
MINIMUM OF 200 typed words and not written on a piece of paper.
2)How can Enterprise Architecture help an enterprise to view its strategic objectives?
3)How can Enterprise Architecture help an enterprise to view its business services?
4)How can Enterprise Architecture help an enterprise to view its technology resources?
2) How can Enterprise Architecture help an enterprise to view its strategic objectives?
Identifying and analyzing new ideas across the organization is the first step in the strategic planning process of successful organizations.
While portfolio management and the project management office (PMO) evaluate the initial idea, the enterprise architecture (EA) team evaluates ideas with top priority and compiles a business case for pursuing (or not pursuing) the idea.
The team examines whether the new idea contradicts or extends existing projects. It examines risk, time schedules, effects on corporate goals and how the changes would be constrained by the principles and controls of the organization.
It develops transition plans and suggests solution alternatives that describe the impact of the change, including estimates on cost, risk, resources, etc.
The business case is shared across the PMO, IT, portfolio management and the business teams to help them make an informed decision about whether to pursue the idea for implementation.
A review board can regularly review returned business cases and prioritize them based on a range of objective and subjective factors such as cost, financial return, strategic relevance, opinions of stakeholders and risk.
Business cases are then translated into initiatives and projects, which can be scheduled for execution.
Enterprise Architecture In The Strategic Planning Lifecycle
EA is often seen as bringing an ‘ivory tower’ perspective in the adoption of new ideas.
But, in the context of this new, integrated approach to strategic planning, the EA function becomes more integrated within the organization and more focused on clearly defined objectives.
The EA lifecycle process is based on the belief that the purpose of an EA is to focus on how to “Do the right things” and “Do things right.”
“Do The Right Things”
The EA team compiles and analyses structured information on the:
Internal capabilities of the organization, goals and long term strategies these capabilities support, and resources that support the goals and strategies.
The EA team reviews high priority initiatives against the capabilities and resources they affect. Initial analysis can be made on the impact of new initiatives on existing projects and whether they are in line with existing strategy.
Target state architectures can be built which deliver the details around each initiative. From these, solution alternatives assess costs, resource estimates and risk. The result is a well defined business case for that initiative.
In developing a business case, the EA team brings together silos of information from various resources, both internal and external, to sort out singular and overlapping ideas. Analysis helps sharpen the focus on key information and provide knowledge in a useful context.
This approach helps the PMO to make smarter decisions about allocating funding and resources to projects. The business case also gives stakeholders such as IT a voice in the process before it reaches the implementation stage.
EA’s role is to synthesize the information in such a way that it helps the organization focus on doing the right things and ensuring they are done the right way.
“Do Things Right”
The EA team also plays a long-term strategic role. An EA can hold information about past successes and reusable assets such as patterns along with a library of guiding principles agreed by the organization.
As new projects begin, a clear high-level overview of what the project will deliver along with any patterns and principles that must apply will be presented. In this manner, the EA acts in a governance role to ensure reuse of investment and standardization is maintained.
The improved control reduces risk and cost. As projects conclude, the output of the project will be assessed and reusable assets harvested into the architectural asset library. This provides a historical context for future decisions.
Types Of Enterprise Architect
Today’s EA practitioners fall into two primary roles:
An innovation driver, the Vanguard enterprise architect deals with technology disruptions and enterprise connectivity, while the Foundational enterprise architect maintains enterprise technology and the systems of record.
The vanguard practitioner is emerging as a person with an ability to make and communicate business decisions that transcend digital business and technological disruptors.
Gartner predicts the number of these practitioners will grow considerably. The vanguard enterprise architect is an agile role by nature, dealing with constant innovation and change. The future of EA puts the enterprise architect in a leadership role by driving strategy based on business goals and drivers.
Deliverables for this emerging breed of enterprise architect include strategic guidance from the CxO-suite and downwards using the innovation and EA tools described in this book. The diverse skill set of this version of the enterprise architect links digital business, social connected-ness, and technology.
To build out these types of teams, organizations are looking to the millennial generation who have garnered these skills due to early exposure to technology and the digital world.
This is not to say that historical knowledge of EA practices and an understanding of modeling and IT structures is no longer valued, but skill sets need to evolve with business requirements. The new face of EA will succeed through fresh, big picture thinking combined with traditional application of models and data.
Today’s reality is that pretty much any capability the business innovates will require the technology department to figure out how to deliver it and at speed. This means an understanding of how this technology will not only impact its users, but the entire business ecosystem will be a highly valued contribution to the enterprise and the vanguard enterprise architect is very well positioned to deliver that value.
3) How can Enterprise Architecture help an enterprise to view its business services?
Neither business service nor capability are unanimously defined and agreed so far.
In the absence of sanctioned definitions, the subject is then open to interpretation until an wide agreement is reached.
Nevertheless, employing common sense meanings, a business service can be defined in relation to a customer and supplier pair. The customer is external to the service but not necessarily to the enterprise. In fact the notion of "externality" is relative. A business service can have internal customers and and as such can be "internal" to the enterprise.
A capability is something the enterprise can do, can deliver. It has the expertise, the technology and the organisation to do it. Capabilities can be planned and realised as such.
What can a capability do? Deliver a business service indeed.
Hence, there is a strong relationship between them.
The question is do we need both in representing a business architecture? Yes? No?
Enterprises are not services oriented, not yet, that is they they don't have well cut business services. But they do have capabilities.
Hence, for most enterprises I would employ the capabilities concept.
For a potential target state of such enterprises, I would use the business service concept as an evolution from capability.
For example, in an enterprise there is often an IT Help Desk. Once this capability is formalised and well defined with interfaces, contracts... then it becomes a service eventually supplied by someone else or in the cloud.
4) How can Enterprise Architecture help an enterprise to view its technology resource?
Definition: Enterprise technology, information, and infrastructure refers to the concept of information technology (IT) resources and data that are shared across an enterprise. (The term "enterprise" minimally means across a sponsor's entire organization, i.e., corporate versus department level, but it can just as easily be cross-organizational such as multi-agency or Joint/DoD level.) Embodied in this concept are technical efforts such as infrastructure engineering for building, managing, and evolving shared IT; IT or infrastructure operations for administering and monitoring the performance of the IT service being provided to the enterprise; IT services management; and information services management. Efforts like IT strategy and portfolio management and IT governance enable this concept to function effectively.
Best Practices and Lessons Learned
In complex environments such as enterprise-level IT programs, three important factors should be taken into consideration: the stakeholders, the technology, and the mission the IT supports. Failure in even one of these factors can cause total program failure.
Know the stakeholders. An "enterprise" usually involves a set of constituents with various goals, requirements, and resources. Sometimes these constituents' considerations are at odds with one another. Vital elements of the nontechnical aspects of enterprise IT are understanding the various stakeholders and being able to articulate needs from their perspective. Several methods exist for analyzing stakeholders. For instance, a simple POET (Political, Operational, Economic, Technical) analysis can be used to clearly articulate issues associated with stakeholders (see the Stakeholder Assessment and Management article). Understanding the kind of governance required to make an enterprise function is also necessary (see the IT Governance article). Governance is what enables the stakeholders to communicate their needs and participate in the enterprise definition, evolution, and operation. The need for strong governance cannot be overstated.
Know the technology. A wide array of technology is associated with enterprise IT programs, from networking details to cloud computing and data centers. Keeping abreast of the current trends in the appropriate areas of your IT program allows you to address disruptive technology concerns and apply sound technical practice to the job. Because computing is so prevalent in today's society and it takes many forms from desktop PCs to handheld mobile devices, everyone touches technology and has expectations from it—often unrealistic. Our sponsors and other program stakeholders are no different. The key to managing technical expectations is knowing the technology and its applicability and having the trust of the sponsor so you can help them recognize when something is too immature for implementation and not a shrink-wrapped, off-the-shelf bargain.
In addition to knowing the technology itself is knowing how to apply good IT management techniques. IT service efforts have frameworks and best practices to leverage. A fairly complete and commonly referenced framework is the Information Technology Service Management and Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL), owned and licensed by AXELOS Ltd. since July 2013 [2]. The IT Service Management article details this further. In addition, NIST [3] provides many useful references for IT, cloud computing, security, and the Federal Information Security Management Act.
Know the mission being supported. It is very important to understand the mission(s) that the infrastructure support(s). The ability to articulate the technical implications of mission needs is arguably the most valuable systems engineering talent to bring to bear on sponsor programs. Enterprise technology succeeds by anticipating end-user needs and proactively addressing them, not waiting for breakage or unhappy users to complain that they are not being supported. This is complex and difficult to do for an enterprise, but it is necessary as computing and infrastructure become more commoditized. The Engineering Information-Intensive Enterprises section addresses ways to support the mission through enterprise systems engineering.