Question

In: Statistics and Probability

12. Measuring effect size for two-factor ANOVA It is projected that approximately 580,000 veterans will take...

12. Measuring effect size for two-factor ANOVA

It is projected that approximately 580,000 veterans will take advantage of the GI Bill for the 21st Century. Boots to Books is a course for all veterans, current military members, and their family members, friends, and supporters. The goal of Boots to Books is to assist deployed, postdeployed, and veteran students in making a positive transition from military to civilian life or from deployment to postdeployment life, including the acquisition of college survival skills.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is quite common among combat veterans. Suppose that a researcher wants to revise the Boots to Books course in order to reduce the effects of PTSD. He recruits a group of combat veterans and collects data on the length of time they were in the military (factor A) and the potential components of the revised course (journaling, community service, physical activity, and meditation: factor B). He then assigns them one of the four components. The study will evaluate which components of the program are the most effective for reducing PTSD symptoms.

The results of the hypothetical study are summarized in the following data matrix. Each cell reports the average (M), the total (T), and the sum of squares (SS) of the symptom score (X) on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) of 10 veterans. Veterans are grouped according to the number of years they served in the military.

Factor B: Program Component

Journaling

Community Service

Physical Activity

Meditation

M = 36.5 M = 39 M = 42 M = 45
1–2 T = 365 T = 390 T = 420 T = 450 TROW1ROW1 = 1,625
SS = 252.5 SS = 840 SS = 460 SS = 350
Factor A: Years in Military ΣX² = 156,870
M = 44 M = 44.8 M = 47.6 M = 49.1
3–4 T = 440 T = 448 T = 476 T = 491 TROW2ROW2 = 1,855
SS = 840 SS = 743.6 SS = 670.4 SS = 644.9
TCOL1COL1 = 805 TCOL2COL2 = 838 TCOL3COL3 = 896 TCOL4COL4 = 941

The researcher performs an analysis of variance (ANOVA) to test the hypothesis that the populations defined by the treatment combinations are equal. The results are presented in the following ANOVA table.

ANOVA Table

Source

SS

df

MS

F

Between treatments 1,238.6000 7
Factor A 661.2520 1 661.2520 11.20
Factor B 548.3000 3 182.7667 3.10
AXB interaction 29.0480 3 9.6827 0.16
Within treatments 4,251.4000 72 59.0472
Total 5,490.0000 79

Use the significance level α = 0.05 to complete the following conclusions.

The critical F value for factor A (years in military) is 3.97. Therefore, the main effect due to factor A is_____ .

The critical F value for factor B (program component) is 2.73. Therefore, the main effect due to factor B is____ .

The critical F value for the interaction of factors A and B is 2.73. Therefore, the effect due to the interaction of factors A and B is_____ .

Given the results of the preceding analysis, what does the researcher conclude?

-Veterans who took different components of the program had different PTSD symptom scores. The severity of PTSD symptoms was unrelated to length of service either by itself or in conjunction with the various components of the program.

-Length of service and program component were each related to the severity of PTSD symptoms. However, the effect of each factor was independent of the other.

-Neither length of service nor program component was related to the severity of PTSD symptoms when looked at alone. However, there was an interaction between the two factors such that severity differed by program component differently depending on length of service (and vice versa).

-Veterans with different lengths of service had different PTSD symptom scores. The severity of PTSD symptoms was unrelated to program component either by itself or in conjunction with length of service.

Measure the effect size for factor A (years in military), factor B (program component), and the interaction by computing (partial) eta squares. (Express the value of each eta square as a percent.)

η² for factor A (years in military) = _____  

η² for factor B (program component) = _____

η² for the interaction = ______

Solutions

Expert Solution

Result is significant if test statistic F > critical F value.

The critical F value for factor A (years in military) is 3.97. Therefore, the main effect due to factor A is Significant.

The critical F value for factor B (program component) is 2.73. Therefore, the main effect due to factor B is significant.

The critical F value for the interaction of factors A and B is 2.73. Therefore, the effect due to the interaction of factors A and B is not significant.

Overal; conclusion:-

-The length of service and program component were each related to the severity of PTSD symptoms. However, the effect of each factor was independent of the other.

effect size calculation:-

Partial eta square = (SSeffect)/(SSeffect + SSerror)

η² for factor A (years in military) = (661.252)/(661.252+4,251.4) = 0.1346 = 13.46%

η² for factor B (program component) = (548.3)/(548.3+4,251.4) = 0.1142 = 11.42%

η² for the interaction = (29.048)/(29.048+4,251.4) = 0.0068 = 0.68%


Related Solutions

12. Measuring effect size for two-factor ANOVA It is projected that approximately 580,000 veterans will take...
12. Measuring effect size for two-factor ANOVA It is projected that approximately 580,000 veterans will take advantage of the GI Bill for the 21st Century. Boots to Books is a course for all veterans, current military members, and their family members, friends, and supporters. The goal of Boots to Books is to assist deployed, postdeployed, and veteran students in making a positive transition from military to civilian life or from deployment to postdeployment life, including the acquisition of college survival...
Explain a Two Factor ANOVA with kij=1. How is a Two Factor anova calculated? And how is it used in engineering?
Explain a Two Factor ANOVA with kij=1. How is a Two Factor anova calculated? And how is it used in engineering?
Please Perform ANOVA One-Factor Analysis by doing the following (Hint: Chapter 12, ANOVA): a. Organize the...
Please Perform ANOVA One-Factor Analysis by doing the following (Hint: Chapter 12, ANOVA): a. Organize the data and show in MS Excel (5 points); b. Write down one question that you could answers using ANOVA One Factor analysis with the Happiness_2011.xls dataset and state its null and alternate hypotheses (5 points); c. Perform one ANOVA One-Factor analysis using two reasonable variables from the Happiness_2011.xls dataset (one quantitative variable and one qualitative group variable) and show the analysis results for the...
Explain the effect of volume conductor size on the magnitude and wave shape for measuring nerve...
Explain the effect of volume conductor size on the magnitude and wave shape for measuring nerve potentials.
In a two factor variance of ANOVA, how SSab is computed in the process?
In a two factor variance of ANOVA, how SSab is computed in the process?
The following data was collected for a two -factor ANOVA with three treatments and two blocks....
The following data was collected for a two -factor ANOVA with three treatments and two blocks. Treatment 1 2 3 Block A 8 12 20 B 10 14 18 a) Complete an ANOVA table. b) State the null and alternative hypotheses for treatments. c) State the null and alternative hypotheses for the blocks. d) Using the 0.05 significance level perform the test and indicate your decision for parts b and c.
The following data are given for a two-factor ANOVA with two treatments and three blocks.   ...
The following data are given for a two-factor ANOVA with two treatments and three blocks.    Treatment Block 1 2 A 43 31 B 33 22 C 46 36    Using the 0.05 significance level conduct a test of hypothesis to determine whether the block or the treatment means differ. State the null and alternate hypotheses for treatments. State the decision rule for treatments. (Round your answer to 1 decimal place.)    State the null and alternate hypotheses for blocks....
The following data are given for a two-factor ANOVA with two treatments and three blocks.   ...
The following data are given for a two-factor ANOVA with two treatments and three blocks.    Treatment Block 1 2 A 46 33 B 30 21 C 46 30    Using the 0.05 significance level conduct a test of hypothesis to determine whether the block or the treatment means differ. State the null and alternate hypotheses for treatments. State the decision rule for treatments. (Round your answer to 1 decimal place.)    State the null and alternate hypotheses for blocks....
The following data are given for a two-factor ANOVA with two treatments and three blocks.   ...
The following data are given for a two-factor ANOVA with two treatments and three blocks.    Treatment Block 1 2 A 43 35 B 31 20 C 40 36    Using the 0.05 significance level conduct a test of hypothesis to determine whether the block or the treatment means differ. State the null and alternate hypotheses for treatments. State the decision rule for treatments. (Round your answer to 1 decimal place.)    State the null and alternate hypotheses for blocks....
The following data are given for a two-factor ANOVA with two treatments and three blocks.   ...
The following data are given for a two-factor ANOVA with two treatments and three blocks.    Treatment Block 1 2 A 43 31 B 33 22 C 46 36    Using the 0.05 significance level conduct a test of hypothesis to determine whether the block or the treatment means differ. State the null and alternate hypotheses for treatments. State the decision rule for treatments. (Round your answer to 1 decimal place.)    State the null and alternate hypotheses for blocks....
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT