Question

In: Economics

Suppose a capital abundant country, such as Italy, enters into free trade with a natural resource...

Suppose a capital abundant country, such as Italy, enters into free trade with a natural resource rich country, such as India. (i) Explain the form of trade, such as, who exports what and imports what, using the concept of comparative advantage in trade theory. Identify each country’s comparative advantage and disadvantage. (ii) Does trade create winners and losers within each country? Explain how.

Solutions

Expert Solution

India and Italy will trade in goods in which they are abundant in. Thus, Italy being capital abundant, will have a competitive advantage in capital intensive goods and hence,  will export capital abundant goods to India like heavy machinary, cars etc. while India having abundance of natural resources will have a competitive advantage in semi-finished goods and raw materials and hence, export raw material or semi-finished goods to Italy such as steel which is used in manufacturing of other machinary and hence, count as semi finished good, precious stones are something that can be exported by India etc.

Yes, trade will create losers and winners in both the countries. In Italy, the losers will be owners of resources who provide raw materials to companies because they have to face competition from Indian raw material which is cheaper as India has competitive advantage in this. In India, the losers will be owners if capital as they have to compete with capital intensive goods from Italy which are more efficient as Italy is having competitive advantage in the same.

*Please don’t forget to hit the thumbs up button, if you find the answer helpful.


Related Solutions

4. Suppose a capital abundant country, such as Italy, enters into free trade with a natural...
4. Suppose a capital abundant country, such as Italy, enters into free trade with a natural resource rich country, such as India. (i) Explain the form of trade, such as, who exports what and imports what, using the concept of comparative advantage in trade theory. Identify each country’s comparative advantage and disadvantage. (ii) Does trade create winners and losers within each country? Explain how.
Suppose there are two countries (a capital-abundant country and a labor-abundant country) and two goods (labor-intensive...
Suppose there are two countries (a capital-abundant country and a labor-abundant country) and two goods (labor-intensive good X and capital-intensive good Y). The two countries have identical demand for the two goods and are considering forming a free trade agreement. However, while this agreement received support from most voters in country A, many voters in country B were concerned that the agreement will likely widen income inequality in country B. Please identify which country is likely labor abundant and which...
Suppose that there are two countries; Country 1 and Country 2. Country 1 is capital abundant and country 2 is labor abundant. X is capital intensive and Y is labor intensive.
Suppose that there are two countries; Country 1 and Country 2. Country 1 is capital abundant and country 2 is labor abundant. X is capital intensive and Y is labor intensive. Assume that Country 1 is a large country and country 2 is a small country.Answer the following questions:a) Suppose that Country I's capital stock increases. Show the pregrowth and after growth production and consumption points on a figure. Clearly explain how the production and consumption of commodity X and...
Consider the trade between Germany and the Dominican Republic. Germany is a capital-abundant country and the...
Consider the trade between Germany and the Dominican Republic. Germany is a capital-abundant country and the DR is a labor-abundant country. There are two goods: a capital-intensive good, chemicals, and a labor-intensive good, clothing. (Note: DR stands for Dominican Republic) Answer the following 4 questions according to the above information. 1. Using Heckscher-Ohlin (H-O) Theory, what should be the trade pattern? A. Germany exports clothing and imports chemicals while DR exports chemicals and imports clothing. B. Germany exports chemicals and...
The US is a capital abundant country, and Mexico is a relatively labor abundant country. Assume...
The US is a capital abundant country, and Mexico is a relatively labor abundant country. Assume that each country has an apparel industry (labor-intensive) and an automobile industry (capital-intensive). Assume that the two countries are originally in a state of autarky. a) Use PPFs to show the outcomes in autarky. b) Use the Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson (HOS) model to show what will happen when we open up the two countries to free trade with one another. c) What will happened to the...
Stolper-Samuelson theorem In the Heckscher-Ohlin model, suppose a relatively capital-abundant country opens to trade. Who gains?...
Stolper-Samuelson theorem In the Heckscher-Ohlin model, suppose a relatively capital-abundant country opens to trade. Who gains? Check all that apply. Multiple answers:You can select more than one option A: Workers B: Owners of capital C: The country as a whole
Suppose that a relatively capital-abundant country is exporting the capital- intensive good and importing the labor-intensive...
Suppose that a relatively capital-abundant country is exporting the capital- intensive good and importing the labor-intensive good, but that the “specific- factors” model of Chapter 8 applies rather than the Heckscher-Ohlin model. Assess the effect on the return to labor of the imposition of a tariff on the labor- intensive good.
In free trade a country will not trade if A. Autarky prices and free trade prices...
In free trade a country will not trade if A. Autarky prices and free trade prices are the same. B. Autarky prices are larger than free trade prices. C. Autarky prices are smaller than free trade prices. D. The absolute value of autarky prices are negatively correlated with free trade prices. QUESTION A.3 In the Pure Specific Factors model with two sectors, Cars (C) and Wheat (W), Capital (K) is specific to C and Land (A) is specific to W....
Welfare effects of a tariff in a small country Suppose Burundi is open to free trade...
Welfare effects of a tariff in a small country Suppose Burundi is open to free trade in the world market for maize. Because of Burundi’s small size, the demand for and supply of maize in Burundi do not affect the world price. The following graph shows the domestic maize market in Burundi. The world price of maize is PWPW = $350 per ton. On the following graph, use the green triangle (triangle symbols) to shade the area representing consumer surplus...
Suppose that the country of VIRUS is currently operating in FREE TRADE arrangement with its closest...
Suppose that the country of VIRUS is currently operating in FREE TRADE arrangement with its closest neighbour, VACCINIA. VIRUS, however, is currently going through a difficult economic period, and its largest domestic producer of goods and services is demanding that VIRUS’S Government implement a TARIFF on all goods being imported from VACCINIA to protect the VIRUS’S domestic economy. (i)     The Prime Minister of VIRUS has hired you as she is uncertain what to do. She has asked you to (1)...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT