Question

In: Economics

The US is a capital abundant country, and Mexico is a relatively labor abundant country. Assume...

The US is a capital abundant country, and Mexico is a relatively labor abundant country. Assume that each country has an apparel industry (labor-intensive) and an automobile industry (capital-intensive). Assume that the two countries are originally in a state of autarky.

a) Use PPFs to show the outcomes in autarky.

b) Use the Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson (HOS) model to show what will happen when we

open up the two countries to free trade with one another.

c) What will happened to the production of apparel and automobiles in each country? Which

country will export which good?

d) What will happen to wages and rents, and to returns in both industries?

e) What happens to social well-being in both countries?

Solutions

Expert Solution

US = Capital Abundant Country

Mexico = Labour Abundant Country

Apparel industry = labour intensive, Automobile industry = capital intensive

a) Autarky is a state when both the countries are self-sufficient and not engaging in free trade. As US is capital abundant country = K/L > K*/L* for US, and L*/K* > L/K for Mexico

Take a look at fig 1 and 2 to see the PPF's of US and Mexico, the slope = P

Apparel i.e. labour intensive good is on the Y axis, Automobile i.e. capital intensive good is on the X-axis, Slope = Price of automobiles/Price of apparel,

As US is a capital abundant country, the price of the capital intensive good i.e. automobiles is lower in US than Mexico, similarly, as Mexico is labour abundant country, the price of the labour intensive good i.e. apparel is lower in Mexico than US,

So, the low relative price of automobiles in US, gives a flatter slope, in US 's PPF, high relative price of automobiles in Mexico, gives a steeper slope in Mexico's PPF.

Because US is capital abundant, the US 's PPF is skewed towards automobiles and vice versa for Mexico.

b) When we open up the two countries for trade, In Autarky,

Price of automobiles/Price of apparel in US < Price of automobiles/Price of apparel in Mexico,

US has a comparative advantage in Automobiles as it produces automobiles at a lower cost as compared to Mexico. Mexico has a comparative advantage in Apparel,

When there is free trade: The free trade relative prices of apparel and automobiles are such:

Price of automobiles/Price of apparel in US < World Price of automobiles/World Price of Apparel < Price of automobiles/Price of apparel in Mexico, take a look at fig 3 and 4 for the PPF's of US and Mexico after free trade.

c) Now, according to H-O theorem, a country that is capital abundant is well-endowed with this factor, this will give the country a propensity for producing that good which relatively uses more capital.Similarly is the case for labour abundant country, So, In US, the production of automobiles will increase, and in Mexico, the production of apparel will increase. Also, once free trade is allowed, profit-seeking firms of the country will shift their products to the markets which have a higher price, so thus the capital abundant country will export the capital intensive good i.e. US will export automobiles and import apparel, and Mexico will export Apparel and import automobiles.

d) The theorem says that as the price of the capital-intensive good increases, i.e. if price of automobiles increases, then the price of capital i.e. the factor which is used extensively in the good's production will rise, i.e. in US, the rent on capital will incraese while the wage paid to labour will fall. Similarly, in Mexico, the wage paid to labour wil increase and rent paid on capital will fall. A movement to free trade will result in the real return of the country's abundant factor to increase, while the real return of the scarce factor will reduce. i.e. the capital owners in the US will gain an increase in the real return i.e. the purchasing power of their rental income, while labourers real return will fall. Similarly, in Mexico, the labourers will get an increased real return on their wages while capital owners return will fall.

e) The H-O model says that both the countries will experience an increase in the aggregate efficiency. Each country will produce more of the good it has to export and less of the good it has to import. The production shifts will help to improve the productive efficiency in both US and Mexico. Also, due to the increase in prices, consumers of the countries will gain an improved consumption efficiency. So, the national welfare or social well-being will increase for both the countries due to free trade.


Related Solutions

1.) The US is relatively capital abundant, and India is relatively labor abundant. Assume that the...
1.) The US is relatively capital abundant, and India is relatively labor abundant. Assume that the production of rice is more labor intensive than the production of cars. Suppose there are foreign direct investment (FDI) flows from the US to India,and the FDI is in the car industry. Answer the following questions. a.Explain short-run and long-run effects of the FDI on India's pattern of production, imports and exports. b.How will you answer in Part (a) change if the FDI from...
Suppose that a relatively capital-abundant country is exporting the capital- intensive good and importing the labor-intensive...
Suppose that a relatively capital-abundant country is exporting the capital- intensive good and importing the labor-intensive good, but that the “specific- factors” model of Chapter 8 applies rather than the Heckscher-Ohlin model. Assess the effect on the return to labor of the imposition of a tariff on the labor- intensive good.
Suppose there are two countries (a capital-abundant country and a labor-abundant country) and two goods (labor-intensive...
Suppose there are two countries (a capital-abundant country and a labor-abundant country) and two goods (labor-intensive good X and capital-intensive good Y). The two countries have identical demand for the two goods and are considering forming a free trade agreement. However, while this agreement received support from most voters in country A, many voters in country B were concerned that the agreement will likely widen income inequality in country B. Please identify which country is likely labor abundant and which...
Suppose that there are two countries; Country 1 and Country 2. Country 1 is capital abundant and country 2 is labor abundant. X is capital intensive and Y is labor intensive.
Suppose that there are two countries; Country 1 and Country 2. Country 1 is capital abundant and country 2 is labor abundant. X is capital intensive and Y is labor intensive. Assume that Country 1 is a large country and country 2 is a small country.Answer the following questions:a) Suppose that Country I's capital stock increases. Show the pregrowth and after growth production and consumption points on a figure. Clearly explain how the production and consumption of commodity X and...
Discussion Questions 1 ”No country is abundant in everything.” Discuss. 2 If Japan is relatively capital...
Discussion Questions 1 ”No country is abundant in everything.” Discuss. 2 If Japan is relatively capital rich and the US is relatively land rich, and if food is relatively land intensive, what happens to price when these formerly autarkic countries trade? • global price of food • relative price of food in the US, Japan 3 Why is it that North-South trade in manufactures seems to be consistent with the results or expectations generated by the factor-proportions theory of international...
380 Global Economy Consider a world comprised of a capital-abundant developed country (H) and labor-abundant developing...
380 Global Economy Consider a world comprised of a capital-abundant developed country (H) and labor-abundant developing country (F). Both countries produce perfectly competitive agriculture (A) and manufacturing (M) sectors, which are labor (L) and capital (K) intensive, respectively. Each sector uses both factors for production, and those factors are substitutable. Demand structure is the same across the countries. The amount of factor “used” for each sector is given by Aka, Ala, Akm, and Alm. For other variables needed, use superscript...
Assume that increasing costs prevail in both Russia and Latvia. Russia is a labor abundant country...
Assume that increasing costs prevail in both Russia and Latvia. Russia is a labor abundant country compared to Latvia; and Latvia is a capital abundant country compared to Russia. Vodka, which is produced in both countries, is a labor-intensive product; and computer, which is also produced in both countries, is a capital-intensive product. (a) Draw the production possibility frontiers of both countries. Identify the autarky prices and the trade triangles under normal conditions when they engage in free trade. Make...
Suppose that a Home country is a labor-abundant country, and produces bananas (labor intensive) and computers...
Suppose that a Home country is a labor-abundant country, and produces bananas (labor intensive) and computers (capital intensive). Given all the theory and assumptions of the Heckscher-Ohlin model holds true, answer the following questions: A). Draw and explain in a graph the free trade equilibrium for Home Country (Remember PPFs? Make sure to clearly indicate the production point, the consumption point, and the quantity of exports and imports). B). In the graph drawn above for question (a), show the effects...
Suppose that a Home country is a labor-abundant country, and produces bananas (labor intensive) and computers...
Suppose that a Home country is a labor-abundant country, and produces bananas (labor intensive) and computers (capital intensive). Given all the theory and assumptions of the Heckscher-Ohlin model holds true, answer the following questions: A). Draw and explain in a graph the free trade equilibrium for Home Country (Remember PPFs? ! Make sure to clearly indicate the production point, the consumption point, and the quantity of exports and imports). B). In the graph drawn above for question (a), show the...
5. a. Western Europe is capital abundant, Eastern Europe is labor abundant; manufacturing is capital intensive...
5. a. Western Europe is capital abundant, Eastern Europe is labor abundant; manufacturing is capital intensive (X) and agriculture (Y) is labor intensive.  Assume also that tastes in Western and Eastern Europe is unbaised and that labor and capital is mobile between manufacturing and agriculture within each region.  Illustrate everything on the trade diagram for both regions with pre trade, post trade price ratios! Write down the pre trade and post trade production and consumption points and the pattern of trade as...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT