In: Finance
A certain asset was purchased at a cost of $2,700,000. This company is in the 21% tax bracket. Complete the lines below:
Year MACRS % Amount of Deprec Amount of Deprec Difference Tax Effect
under MACRS under straight line
1 .3333 ______________ ________________
2 .4444 ______________ ________________ _____________ _________
3 .1482 ______________ ________________
4 .0741 ______________
Depreciation expense under straight line = $ 675,000
Year | MACRS % | Amount of depreciation under MACRS | Amount of depreciation under staright line | Difference | Tax effect |
1 | 0.3333 | $899,910 | $675,000 | $224,910 | $47,231.10 |
2 | 0.4444 | $1,199,880 | $675,000 | $524,880 | $110,224.80 |
3 | 0.1482 | $400,140 | $675,000 | -$274,860 | -$57,720.60 |
4 | 0.0741 | $200,070 | $675,000 | -$474,930 | -$99,735.30 |
From the above table, it can be concluded that MACRS depreciation method produces higher depreciation expense in year 1 and 2 than staright line method. Therefore using MACRS depreciation method will result in higher tax benefits in year 1 and 2.
In year 3 and 4, staright line method produces higher depreciation expense than MACRS method. As a result, continuing with MACRS method will result in higher taxable income and higher taxes to be paid. By switching over to staright line method in year 3 and 4, the firm can save total taxes of $157455.90 ( $ 57720.60 + $ 99735.30) .