In: Economics
$10 million, including losses due to interrupted student service and potential loss of data collected for years in NSF and DoD sponsored projects. One alternative the school is considering is the installation of an emergency power generator. The cost of the emergency generator is
$80,000, and if it is installed, no losses from this type of incident will be incurred. However, if the generator is not installed, there is a 12% chance that a power outage will occur during a year. If there is an outage, there is a .07 probability that the resulting losses will be very large, or approximately $7 million in net aggregated loss. Alternatively, it is estimated that there is a .93 probability of only slight losses of around $1 million.
Using decision tree analysis, determine whether the SPEA should have install the new power generator. What considerations may change your decision?
The decision Tree can be drawn as follows
Total potential losses of not installing a generator = (7,000,000 * 0.07 + 1,000,000 * 0.93) * 0.12 = 1,420,000 * 0.12 = 170,400
Total expense in installing a generator = $80,000
Since the cost of installing a generator is less than the potential losses of not installing, so it is better to install the generator.
If the probability of a power outage was less than 80,000 /
1,420,000 or less than 5.6%, then it would not have made sense to
install the generator.
Basically if the total potential losses of not installing the
generator was lesser than the cost to install a generator, then the
generator will not be installed. This can happen in either or all
of the following ways
1) The cost of Heavy Damage is lower
2) The potential of a power outage is much lower
3) The cost of installing the generator is higher
If you found this helpful, please rate it so that I can have higher earnings at no extra cost to you. This will motivate me to write more.