In: Finance
Companies invest in expansion projects with the expectation of increasing the earnings of its business. Consider the case of Happy Dog Soap: Happy Dog Soap is considering an investment that will have the following sales, variable costs, and fixed operating costs: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Unit sales (units) 3,000 3,250 3,300 3,400 Sales price $17.25 $17.33 $17.45 $18.24 Variable cost per unit $8.88 $8.92 $9.03 $9.06 Fixed operating costs except depreciation $12,500 $13,000 $13,220 $13,250 Accelerated depreciation rate 33% 45% 15% 7% This project will require an investment of $10,000 in new equipment. The equipment will have no salvage value at the end of the project’s four-year life. Happy Dog Soap pays a constant tax rate of 40%, and it has a required rate of return of 11%. When using accelerated depreciation, the project’s net present value (NPV) is . (Hint: Round each element in your computation—including the project’s net present value—to the nearest whole dollar.) When using straight-line depreciation, the project’s NPV is . (Hint: Again, round each element in your computation—including the project’s net present value—to the nearest whole dollar.) Using the straight-line depreciation method will result in the greater NPV for the project. No other firm would take on this project if Happy Dog Soap turns it down. How much should Happy Dog Soap reduce the NPV of this project if it discovered that this project would reduce one of its division’s net after-tax cash flows by $300 for each year of the four-year project? $791 $931 $698 $559 The project will require an initial investment of $10,000, but the project will also be using a company-owned truck that is not currently being used. This truck could be sold for $14,000, after taxes, if the project is rejected. What should Happy Dog Soap do to take this information into account? Increase the amount of the initial investment by $14,000. Increase the NPV of the project by $14,000. The company does not need to do anything with the value of the truck because the truck is a sunk cost.
1).
Formula | Year (n) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Sales (units) (U) | 3,000 | 3,250 | 3,300 | 3,400 | |
Price/unit (p) | 17.25 | 17.33 | 17.45 | 18.24 | |
Variable cost/unit (vc) | 8.88 | 8.92 | 9.03 | 9.06 | |
(U*p) | Revenue ('R) | 51,750 | 56,323 | 57,585 | 62,016 |
(U*vc) | Variable cost (VC) | 26,640 | 28,990 | 29,799 | 30,804 |
Fixed cost (FC) | 12,500 | 13,000 | 13,220 | 13,250 | |
Depreciation rate | 33% | 45% | 15% | 7% | |
(Dep.rate*10,000) | Depreciation (D) | 3,300 | 4,500 | 1,500 | 700 |
(R-VC-FC-D) | Op.profit (EBIT) | 9,310 | 9,832 | 13,066 | 17,262 |
40% of EBIT | Less: tax @40% | 3,724 | 3,933 | 5,226 | 6,905 |
(EBIT-Tax) | Net income (NI) | 5,586 | 5,900 | 7,840 | 10,357 |
Add: Dep. (D) | 3,300 | 4,500 | 1,500 | 700 | |
(NI - D) | Operating Cash Flow (OCF) | 8,886 | 10,400 | 9,340 | 11,057 |
Formula | Year (n) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Cash flow (CF) | -10,000 | 8,886 | 10,400 | 9,340 | 11,057 | |
1/(1+d)^n | Discount factor @11% | 1.000 | 0.901 | 0.812 | 0.731 | 0.659 |
(CF*Discount factor) | PV of CF | -10,000 | 8,005 | 8,440 | 6,829 | 7,284 |
Sum of all PVs | NPV | 20,559 |
NPV when using accelerated dep. = $20,559
2).
Formula | Year (n) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Sales (units) (U) | 3,000 | 3,250 | 3,300 | 3,400 | |
Price/unit (p) | 17.25 | 17.33 | 17.45 | 18.24 | |
Variable cost/unit (vc) | 8.88 | 8.92 | 9.03 | 9.06 | |
(U*p) | Revenue ('R) | 51,750 | 56,323 | 57,585 | 62,016 |
(U*vc) | Variable cost (VC) | 26,640 | 28,990 | 29,799 | 30,804 |
Fixed cost (FC) | 12,500 | 13,000 | 13,220 | 13,250 | |
Straight line dep. | Depreciation rate | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
(Dep.rate*10,000) | Depreciation (D) | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,500 |
(R-VC-FC-D) | Op.profit (EBIT) | 10,110 | 11,833 | 12,066 | 15,462 |
40% of EBIT | Less: tax @40% | 4,044 | 4,733 | 4,826 | 6,185 |
(EBIT-Tax) | Net income (NI) | 6,066 | 7,100 | 7,240 | 9,277 |
Add: Dep. (D) | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,500 | |
(NI - D) | Operating Cash Flow (OCF) | 8,566 | 9,600 | 9,740 | 11,777 |
Formula | Year (n) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Cash flow (CF) | -10,000 | 8,566 | 9,600 | 9,740 | 11,777 | |
1/(1+d)^n | Discount factor @11% | 1.000 | 0.901 | 0.812 | 0.731 | 0.659 |
(CF*Discount factor) | PV of CF | -10,000 | 7,717 | 7,791 | 7,122 | 7,758 |
Sum of all PVs | NPV | 20,388 |
NPV when using SL dep. = $20,388
NPV when using SL depreciation is greater than NPV when using accelerated dep. - False
3). If $300/year is reduced from cash flows (year 1 to year 4) as calculated in part (1), the new NPV will be:
Formula | Year (n) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Cash flow (CF) | -10,000 | 8,586 | 10,100 | 9,040 | 10,757 | |
1/(1+d)^n | Discount factor @11% | 1.000 | 0.901 | 0.812 | 0.731 | 0.659 |
(CF*Discount factor) | PV of CF | -10,000 | 7,735 | 8,197 | 6,610 | 7,086 |
Sum of all PVs | NPV | 19,628 |
NPV will have to be reduced by 20,599 - 19,628 = $931
4). The company does not need to do anything with the value of the truck because the truck is a sunk cost.