In: Statistics and Probability
Scores for a common standardized college aptitude test are normally distributed with a mean of 512 and a standard deviation of 111. Randomly selected men are given a Test Prepartion Course before taking this test. Assume, for sake of argument, that the test has no effect.
If 1 of the men is randomly selected, find the probability that
his score is at least 591.7.
P(X > 591.7) =
Enter your answer as a number accurate to 4 decimal places.
If 7 of the men are randomly selected, find the probability that
their mean score is at least 591.7.
P(M > 591.7) =
Enter your answer as a number accurate to 4 decimal places.
If the random sample of 7 men does result in a mean score of 591.7, is there strong evidence to support the claim that the course is actually effective?
Yes. The probability indicates that is is unlikely that by chance,
a randomly selected group of students would get a mean as high as
591.7.
No. The probability indicates that is is possible by chance alone
to randomly select a group of students with a mean as high as
591.7.
This is a normal distribution question with
a)
P(x > 591.7)=?
The z-score at x = 591.7 is,
z = 0.718
This implies that
P(x > 591.7) = P(z > 0.718) = 1 - P(z < 0.718) = 1 - 0.7636213565920422
b)
Sample size (n) = 7
Since we know that
P(x > 591.7)=?
The z-score at x = 591.7 is,
z = 1.8997
This implies that
P(x > 591.7) = P(z > 1.8997) = 1 - P(z < 0.718) = 1 - 0.9712637498286429
c)
Yes. The probability indicates that is is unlikely that by chance, a randomly selected group of students would get a mean as high as 591.7.
PS: you have to refer z score table to find the final probabilities.
Please hit thumps up if the answer helped you