Question

In: Statistics and Probability

The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain."...

The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain." That is, activity in the area of the brain that responds to physical pain goes up as distress from social exclusion goes up. The scatterplot for this data shows a moderately strong linear relationship. The data are given below.


     Social      Brain      Social      Brain
Subject      distress      activity Subject      distress      activity
1 1.20 −0.055 8 2.22 0.028
2 1.87 −0.040 9 2.60 0.030
3 1.04 −0.029 10 2.77 0.033
4 2.54 −0.018 11 2.77 0.064
5 2.19 −0.018 12 3.31 0.077
6 2.63 0.018 13 3.65 0.124
7 1.99 0.021

  

(a) What is the equation of the least-squares regression line for predicting brain activity from social distress score? (Round your answers to four decimal places.)

brain activity = social distress +

Make a scatterplot with this line drawn on it.

(b) On your plot, show the "up and over" lines that predict brain activity for social distress score 2.6. Use the equation of the regression line to get the predicted brain activity level. Verify that it agrees with your plot. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)

(c) What percent of the variation in brain activity among these subjects is explained by the straight-line relationship with social distress score? (Round your answer to a whole number.) %

Solutions

Expert Solution

The regression equation is defined as,

Where, predictor variable Y is brain activity and response variable X is social distress

The least square estimate of intercept and slope are,

Subject Social distress, X Brain activity, Y X^2 Y^2 X*Y
1 1.2 -0.055 1.44 0.003025 -0.066
2 1.87 -0.04 3.4969 0.0016 -0.0748
3 1.04 -0.029 1.0816 0.000841 -0.03016
4 2.54 -0.018 6.4516 0.000324 -0.04572
5 2.19 -0.018 4.7961 0.000324 -0.03942
6 2.63 0.018 6.9169 0.000324 0.04734
7 1.99 0.021 3.9601 0.000441 0.04179
8 2.22 0.028 4.9284 0.000784 0.06216
9 2.6 0.028 6.76 0.000784 0.0728
10 2.77 0.028 7.6729 0.000784 0.07756
11 2.77 0.028 7.6729 0.000784 0.07756
12 3.31 0.028 10.9561 0.000784 0.09268
13 3.65 0.028 13.3225 0.000784 0.1022
SUM 30.78 0.047 79.456 0.011583 0.31799

Form the data values, the values are calculated as,

The regression equation is,

The scatter plot is obtained in excel. The screenshot is shown below,

For social distress score = 2.6,

c)

The R square value is obtained using the formula,

Hence the percent of variation explained by model is 56.91%


Related Solutions

The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain."...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain." That is, activity in the area of the brain that responds to physical pain goes up as distress from social exclusion goes up. The scatterplot for this data shows a moderately strong linear relationship. The data are given below.      Social      Brain      Social      Brain Subject      distress      activity Subject      distress      activity 1 1.22 −0.055   8 2.18 0.027 2...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain."...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain." That is, activity in the area of the brain that responds to physical pain goes up as distress from social exclusion goes up. The scatterplot for this data shows a moderately strong linear relationship. The data are given below.      Social      Brain      Social      Brain Subject      distress      activity Subject      distress      activity 1 1.22 −0.055 8 2.20 0.028 2...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain."...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain." That is, activity in the area of the brain that responds to physical pain goes up as distress from social exclusion goes up. The scatterplot for this data shows a moderately strong linear relationship. The data are given below. Social Brain Social Brain Subject distress activity Subject distress activity 1 1.28 −0.055 8 2.20 0.025 2 1.87 −0.040 9 2.58 0.027 3 1.08 −0.026...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain."...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain." That is, activity in the area of the brain that responds to physical pain goes up as distress from social exclusion goes up. The scatterplot for this data shows a moderately strong linear relationship. The data are given below.      Social      Brain      Social      Brain Subject      distress      activity Subject      distress      activity 1 1.20 −0.055 8 2.22 0.028 2...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain."...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain." That is, activity in the area of the brain that responds to physical pain goes up as distress from social exclusion goes up. The scatterplot for this data shows a moderately strong linear relationship. The data are given below.      Social      Brain      Social      Brain Subject      distress      activity Subject      distress      activity 1 1.24 −0.055 8 2.20 0.025 2...
The table below gives a breakdown of the root causes of a sample of 90 industrial...
The table below gives a breakdown of the root causes of a sample of 90 industrial accidents. Are there significant differences in the percentage of incidents in the four cause​ categories? Test using alpha =.05. System Cause Number of Incidents Design 24 Procedures 30 Management 22 Training 14 Total 90 Give null, alternative, test statistic, decision, and conclusion.
The data in the table below is from a study conducted by an insurance company to...
The data in the table below is from a study conducted by an insurance company to determine the effect of changing the process by which insurance claims are approved. The goal was to improve policyholder satisfaction by speeding up the process and eliminating some non-value-added approval steps in the process. The response measured was the average time required to approve and mail all claims initiated in a week. The new procedure was tested for 12 weeks, and the results were...
The data in the table below is from a study conducted by an insurance company to...
The data in the table below is from a study conducted by an insurance company to determine the effect of changing the process by which insurance claims are approved. The goal was to improve policyholder satisfaction by speeding up the process and eliminating some non-value-added approval steps in the process. The response measured was the average time required to approve and mail all claims initiated in a week. The new procedure was tested for 12 weeks, and the results were...
The data in the table below is from a study conducted by an insurance company to...
The data in the table below is from a study conducted by an insurance company to determine the effect of changing the process by which insurance claims are approved. The goal was to improve policyholder satisfaction by speeding up the process and eliminating some non-value-added approval steps in the process. The response measured was the average time required to approve and mail all claims initiated in a week. The new procedure was tested for 12 weeks, and the results were...
The data in the table below gives sales revenue for Continental Divide Mining from 1995 to...
The data in the table below gives sales revenue for Continental Divide Mining from 1995 to 2005. YEAR YEARS SINCE 1990 SALES REVENUE (MILLIONS) 1995 2.6155 1998 3.3131 1999 3.9769 2000 4.5494 2001 4.8949 2002 5.1686 2003 4.9593 2005 4.7489 (a) Complete the missing column in the table. (b) Use Excel to determine the quadratic regression model, y, that best represents sales revenue as a function of, x, the number of years since 1990. Round three decimal places. (a) Find...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT